Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018531
Original file (20080018531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 April 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018531 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that deductions from his retired pay for the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) be stopped.

2.  The applicant essentially states that he initially enrolled in the RCSBP in August 1993, but that in January 2008, he filled out his retirement package and declined to participate in the RCSBP, and that his last election should be used.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored letter, dated 29 October 2008 and a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) that he completed on 
6 May 2007 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, who previously served in the Regular Army and was a member of the Army National Guard, was notified in a memorandum, dated 5 August 1993, of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60.  Enclosed with this memorandum was an SBP summary.  On 21 August 1993, the applicant completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate), elected full SBP coverage for his spouse, and indicated that he had no dependent children at the time.  He also elected Option C (Immediate Coverage).  This document was properly 

witnessed, and contained the following statement:  "IMPORTANT:  The decision you make with respect to participate in this Survivor Benefit Plan is a permanent irrevocable decision.  Please consider your decision and its effect very carefully." 

2.  On 16 June 2008, the applicant reached age 60.  In his self-authored letter, dated 29 October 2008, he essentially stated that his July 2008 retirement check had a deduction for SBP.

3.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 (and participate in SBP), to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  If death does not occur before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C are deducted from the member’s retired pay (costs for option C being the more expensive).  Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.  Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60.  They cannot cancel SBP participation or change options they had in RCSBP – it automatically rolls into SBP coverage.  If RCSBP Option B or C is elected, there is a Reservist Portion cost added to the basic cost of the SBP to cover the additional benefit and assured protection should the member have died prior to age 60.

4.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  Reservists who elected an option under the RCSBP continue to have the Reservist Portion cost deducted from their retired pay.

5.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that deductions from his retired pay for the RCSBP should be stopped.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

3.  It is clear that the applicant completed a DD Form 1883 on 21 August 1993 electing full SBP coverage for his spouse.  At the time, he had three options to choose from, two of which were irrevocable, and he chose to enroll in the RCSBP Option C with immediate full spouse coverage.  Based upon his election of Option C, had the applicant died prior to reaching age 60, his spouse would have been eligible to receive full SBP entitlements.  At the time, he chose an irrevocable option when he enrolled in SBP on 21 August 1993.  However, he is not precluded from terminating his SBP participation beginning on the second anniversary of the date his retired pay started, provided his spouse concurs.  He should understand that he will still have to pay the RCSBP portion cost for the protection his spouse would have received had he died before reaching age 60.

4.  There is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence, which shows that he was not properly advised about the potential consequences of choosing the various options of the SBP when he made his initial election for enrollment.  Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant's request for terminating his enrollment in the RCSBP in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x____  ___x___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.






      __________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018531



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018531



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007710

    Original file (20070007710.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 1 July 2005; a copy of DD Form 2656-2 (Survivor Benefit Plan Termination Request), dated 15 May 2007; a copy of DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 21 May 2007; and a copy of DFAS-CL Form 7220/148 (Retiree Account Statement), effective 3 May 2007, in support of this request. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005016C071029

    Original file (20070005016C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    John G. Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His wife is a Master Sergeant in the U. S. Army Reserve and will have her own retired pay. Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009043

    Original file (20140009043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He completed prior service in the Regular Army and married L____ on 27 March 1987. The applicant provided a Complaint for Absolute Divorce that was filed on 15 July 2003; however, his service record is void of evidence and he has not provided any evidence which shows he was granted a final divorce by the court.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005589

    Original file (20070005589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 November 1989, he elected Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP), option C, immediate coverage for his survivors on Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883. The applicant’s election to participate in the RCSBP was an irrevocable decision which rolled over into the SBP upon his reaching age 60. The applicant will have a one-year window of opportunity to terminate SBP coverage between the second and third year anniversary following the date the applicant started to receive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002140

    Original file (20150002140.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150002140 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This letter further informed her that: a. she was entitled to participate in the RCSBP, as established by Public Law 95-397; b. RCSBP enabled her to provide an annuity for her spouse and other eligible beneficiaries; c. she had, by law, only 90 calendar days from the date she received this notice to submit a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate); d....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012542

    Original file (20080012542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the deductions being made from his Retired Pay for Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) premiums be stopped. The applicant was placed on the retired list on 25 May 2008 (at age 60) and premiums are now being deducted from his retired pay for both RCSBP and SBP. Therefore, since he has failed to show that he was misinformed of his options under the SBP and since he has the option of terminating his SBP participation beginning on the second anniversary of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010058

    Original file (20080010058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 March 2008, when he submitted his request for retired pay at age 60, the applicant elected spouse full coverage under the SBP and on 16 May 2008, when he turned 60 years of age, he began receiving retired pay with SBP deductions for spouse only. Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60. The applicant’s contention that he opted not to participate in the SBP has been noted; however, prior to making that election, the applicant enrolled in the RCSBP under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014058

    Original file (20080014058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to correction of his records to show that he rescinded his election to participate in the RCSBP or SBP. The evidence of record shows that the applicant attained age 60 and eligibility for retired pay on 15 July 2008. In support of that effort, a copy of DD Form 2656-2 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request) is being provided to the applicant, along with this Record of Proceedings.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010875

    Original file (20060010875.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DFAS retired pay statement shows he became eligible for retired pay on 1 June 2006. Option B or C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60. The evidence of record shows the applicant elected option C on 22 November 1989.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001714

    Original file (20070001714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070001714 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. If RCSBP Option B or C is elected, there is a Reservist Portion cost added to the basic cost of the SBP to cover the additional benefit and assured protection had the member died prior to age 60. No changes could be...