RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 19 April 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070005016
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz | |Acting Director |
| |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. John N. Slone | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. David K. Haasenritter | |Member |
| |Mr. John G. Heck | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)
coverage be cancelled.
2. The applicant states he enrolled in the [Reserve Component] SBP (RCSBP)
17 years ago. He was told he could change the SBP [coverage] when he
turned age 60. However, he completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of
Retired Personnel) and checked that he did not want the SBP, with his
wife’s concurrence, and he is still being charged for the SBP. His wife is
a Master Sergeant in the U. S. Army Reserve and will have her own retired
pay.
3. The applicant provides a divorce decree from his previous marriage and
his marriage certificate for his current marriage.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant was born on 15 February 1947. After having had prior
service in the Regular Army, he entered the U. S. Army Reserve in 1973. He
was promoted to Sergeant Major, E-9 on 9 December 1988. He was laterally
appointed to Command Sergeant Major apparently sometime after September
1989.
2. The applicant’s notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60
(his 20-year letter) was dated 25 May 1991. On 26 August 1991, he
completed a DD Form 1883 electing to enroll in the RCSBP for spouse
coverage, full base amount, Option C. The DD Form 1883 stated, “IMPORTANT:
The decision you make with respect to participation in the Survivor
Benefit Plan is a permanent irrevocable decision.”
3. On 11 April 1995, the applicant was divorced from A___. The divorce
decree did not mention the SBP.
4. The applicant married K___ on 15 January 1999.
5. On 5 April 2006, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656. In item 26,
he indicated he elected not to participate in the SBP. In item 30, his
spouse concurred with his decision.
6. The instructions pages of the DD Form 2656 provided guidance that
members who elected RCSBP were not to complete items 26 through 31.
7. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that
military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide
for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Changes in SBP options
are not authorized except in specific instances as authorized by law.
8. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way
for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60
to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching
age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and
choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a
beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment
of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a
beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age
60. If death does not occur before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B
and C are deducted from the member’s retired pay. Once a member elects
either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is
irrevocable. Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at
age 60. They cannot cancel SBP participation or change options they had in
RCSBP – it automatically rolls into SBP coverage. If RCSBP Option B or C
is elected, there is a Reservist Portion cost added to the basic cost of
the SBP to cover the additional benefit and assured protection had the
member died prior to age 60.
9. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985, permitted a previously
participating retiree upon remarriage to elect not to resume spouse
coverage or to increase reduced coverage for the latter spouse. Changes
must be made prior to the first anniversary of remarriage or else the
previously suspended coverage resumes by default on the first day of the
month following the first anniversary of the remarriage, with costs owed
from that date. An election to terminate spouse coverage under this law,
once made, is irrevocable.
10. Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to
terminate SBP participation. Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on
the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to
withdraw from SBP. The spouse’s concurrence is required. No premiums will
be refunded to those who opt to disenroll. Reservists who elected an
option under the RCSBP will continue to have the Reservist Portion cost
deducted from their retired pay. The effective date of termination is the
first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the
election is received by the Secretary concerned.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s DD Form 1883 informed him that his RCSBP election was
an irrevocable decision. When he completed his DD Form 2656, the
instructions pages informed him that since he had made an RCSBP election he
was not to make a standard SBP election.
2. The applicant’s contention that his current spouse will have her own
retired pay is understood. When he married his current spouse in January
1999, he had a one-year opportunity in which he could have elected not to
resume spouse coverage. Either he was not aware that he could make that
election or he failed to make that election in a timely manner. In either
case his spouse, even though she would have been eligible for her own
retired pay at age 60, would have been eligible to receive the RCSBP
annuity had he died prior to reaching age 60.
3. The applicant turned age 60 on 15 February 2007. On 1 March 2009, he
will have a one-year opportunity to disenroll from the SBP. If he
disenrolls at that time, the Reservist Portion cost of his RCSBP will still
be deducted from his retired pay.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__jns___ __dkh___ __jgh___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
__John N. Slone_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20070005016 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20070419 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Mr. Schwartz |
|ISSUES 1. |137.04 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020841
The applicant states the following: * he was never informed he had to decline the SBP within 1 year of his divorce from his former spouse * he received no written communications from the military to keep him informed of these circumstances * the Tennessee Army National Guard requested that he complete a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) in 2008 for inclusion in his application for retired pay * he completed the DD Form 2656 and declined SBP 3. On 18 October 1991, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023565
The applicant states: * Upon his divorce in 2001, he notified officials at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) that he was divorced and did not want to participate in the SBP * When he applied for retired pay in January 2011, he and his new spouse elected not to participate in the SBP * When he received his first Retiree Account Statement, he noticed that he was enrolled in the SBP and his first wife was listed as the beneficiary * DFAS corrected the next pay statement by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005589
On 19 November 1989, he elected Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP), option C, immediate coverage for his survivors on Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883. The applicants election to participate in the RCSBP was an irrevocable decision which rolled over into the SBP upon his reaching age 60. The applicant will have a one-year window of opportunity to terminate SBP coverage between the second and third year anniversary following the date the applicant started to receive...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020819
Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant's DD Form 1883 shows he enrolled in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage on 10 December 1996. He is further advised...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001714
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070001714 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. If RCSBP Option B or C is elected, there is a Reservist Portion cost added to the basic cost of the SBP to cover the additional benefit and assured protection had the member died prior to age 60. No changes could be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021525
BOARD DATE: 8 March 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021525 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His 20-year letter notified him, in pertinent part, that upon receipt of this letter, a qualified Reserve Component (RC) married member would automatically be enrolled in the RC Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) under Option C, Spouse and Child(ren) coverage based on full retired pay, unless his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000893C070205
However, the evidence of record shows that the applicant elected to participate in the RCSBP in June 1992. His first opportunity to elect to terminate his participation in the SBP would have occurred on 1 July 2004, the second anniversary of the first month he received retired pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he requested, with his spouse’s concurrence, termination of his participation in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007403
The applicant states: * When he retired he was married to his former spouse and they divorced in January 2007 * When he remarried in September 2007, he sent documentation to decline SBP * He believes this information is on record because no premiums were taken out of his retired pay until January 2010 * He has noticed that he now owes $1,700.00 in debt for this clerical error * He submitted paperwork for the "secondary beneficiaries" prior to the birth of his fourth child and his name was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010035
The applicant provides: * Previous application to this Board and a failure to exhaust letter * Letter dated 23 May 2014 from DFAS to her Member of Congress * DD Form 2656, dated 15 November 2012 * DD Form 2656-6, dated 7 January 2014 * Copy of her military identification card * Letter, dated 6 February 2014, to an RSO in Monterey, CA * Letter from the National Personnel Records Center * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 * Letter from DFAS-Retired and Annuity Pay,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028817
The form shows he elected spouse and children RCSBP coverage based on the full amount of retired pay and Option C (Immediate Coverage). The DD Form 2656-6 he submitted includes the following note below item 8: If either "Divorce" or "Death of Spouse" is selected, and the member has previously elected spouse and child coverage, the coverage would convert to "Child Only" coverage if the member has an eligible child. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request to void his...