Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001714
Original file (20070001714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  7 August 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070001714 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Jeanne Marie Rowan

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Linda Simmons

Chairperson

Ms. Ernestine Fields

Member

Mr. Randolph Fleming

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests cancellation of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).  He also requests a total refund of SBP payments made as a payroll deduction.

2.  The applicant states that he declined SBP in September 2005 when he submitted his finance retirement paperwork to the Defense Finance and Accounting System (DFAS).  DFAS withdrew SBP payments from his retirement pay.  He further states he elected the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan in 1991. 

3.  The applicant did not provide any additional documentary evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 21 November 1946.  Records show the applicant entered military service on 1 July 1970 and served in the Army National Guard, United States Army Reserves and active duty.  He retired as a lieutenant colonel/pay grade O-5. 

2.   On 23 February 1991, he was forwarded his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) from the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri.  

3.  On 21 June 1991, he elected Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP); option C, immediate coverage for his survivors on Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883.  

4.  On 18 September 2005, the applicant applied for retired pay.  At that time, he elected to decline coverage in the SBP.  His spouse gave her concurrence by signing the DD Form 2656 also on 18 September 2005 with a witness present.

5.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  If death does not occur before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C are deducted from the member’s retired pay (costs for option C being the more expensive).  Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.  Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60.  They cannot cancel SBP participation or change options they had in RCSBP as it automatically rolls into SBP coverage.  If RCSBP Option B or C is elected, there is a Reservist Portion cost added to the basic cost of the SBP to cover the additional benefit and assured protection had the member died prior to age 60.  

6.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  Reservists who elected an option under the RCSBP may continue to have the Reservist Portion cost deducted from their retired pay.  The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2.  The applicant’s election to participate in the RCSBP was an irrevocable decision which rolled over into the SBP upon his reaching age 60.  No changes could be made upon his application for retired pay.  

3.  The applicant will have a one-year window of opportunity to terminate SBP coverage between the second and third year anniversary following the date the applicant started to receive retired pay.  No premiums will be refunded and no annuity will be payable upon the applicant's death.  The spouse must consent in writing to withdrawal from SBP.  Termination is permanent and participation may no be resumed under any circumstance.  The Reservist Portion cost may continue to be deducted from the applicant's retirement pay. 

4  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__LS____  ___EF __  ___RF___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





_____ Linda Simmons_______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070001714
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070807
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
137.03
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005589

    Original file (20070005589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 November 1989, he elected Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP), option C, immediate coverage for his survivors on Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883. The applicant’s election to participate in the RCSBP was an irrevocable decision which rolled over into the SBP upon his reaching age 60. The applicant will have a one-year window of opportunity to terminate SBP coverage between the second and third year anniversary following the date the applicant started to receive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010058

    Original file (20080010058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 March 2008, when he submitted his request for retired pay at age 60, the applicant elected spouse full coverage under the SBP and on 16 May 2008, when he turned 60 years of age, he began receiving retired pay with SBP deductions for spouse only. Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60. The applicant’s contention that he opted not to participate in the SBP has been noted; however, prior to making that election, the applicant enrolled in the RCSBP under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010875

    Original file (20060010875.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DFAS retired pay statement shows he became eligible for retired pay on 1 June 2006. Option B or C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60. The evidence of record shows the applicant elected option C on 22 November 1989.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002140

    Original file (20150002140.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150002140 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This letter further informed her that: a. she was entitled to participate in the RCSBP, as established by Public Law 95-397; b. RCSBP enabled her to provide an annuity for her spouse and other eligible beneficiaries; c. she had, by law, only 90 calendar days from the date she received this notice to submit a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate); d....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005016C071029

    Original file (20070005016C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    John G. Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His wife is a Master Sergeant in the U. S. Army Reserve and will have her own retired pay. Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065902C070421

    Original file (2001065902C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Once a member elects either Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. The evidence of record shows that the applicant did complete a DD Form 1883 in 1991 enrolling in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage. Although the applicant may not have been in troop unit at the time, he could have contacted a retirement services officer at the nearest military installation or contacted the Retired Activities Office, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000893C070205

    Original file (20060000893C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the evidence of record shows that the applicant elected to participate in the RCSBP in June 1992. His first opportunity to elect to terminate his participation in the SBP would have occurred on 1 July 2004, the second anniversary of the first month he received retired pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he requested, with his spouse’s concurrence, termination of his participation in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018531

    Original file (20080018531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60. Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant's request for terminating his enrollment in the RCSBP in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010144

    Original file (20090010144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010144 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s DD Form 2656-11 shows that on 8 January 2009 he verified that he had been notified by DFAS of the requirement to have 360 plus months toward Paid-Up SBP. Effective 1 October 2008, no reduction may be made in the retired pay of a participant in the SBP for any month after the later of : (1) the 360th month for which the participant’s retired pay is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020841

    Original file (20090020841.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the following: * he was never informed he had to decline the SBP within 1 year of his divorce from his former spouse * he received no written communications from the military to keep him informed of these circumstances * the Tennessee Army National Guard requested that he complete a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) in 2008 for inclusion in his application for retired pay * he completed the DD Form 2656 and declined SBP 3. On 18 October 1991, the...