Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016965
Original file (20080016965.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        18 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080016965 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he completed the        37-week Burmese Language course at the Foreign Language Center of the Defense Language Institute (DLI), Presidio of Monterey, California (CA), instead of the U.S. Army Intelligence School (USAINTS), Fort Holabird, Maryland (MD).

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly lists the location of his language training as USAINTS, MD, instead of DLI, CA. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, dated 15 May 1968; a copy of a certificate, dated 25 June 1965, showing completion of the Burmese Language course, at the Foreign Language Center, DLI, CA; and a copy of his DLI official transcripts, dated 11 December 1979, in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years on 15 June 1964.  He completed basic combat training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, on 17 September 1964, and proceeded to DLI-Presidio of Monterey, CA, on 18 September 1964.  He subsequently completed the 37-week Burmese Language course on 25 June 1965 and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 04B (Interpreter).  

3.  The applicant's records further show he completed various assignments within and outside of the continental United States and was honorably separated and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) on 15 May 1968.

4.  Item 25 (Education and Training Completed) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the entry "USAINTS, Fort Holabird, MD, 37 Weeks, Language." 

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training and will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  For enlisted Soldiers, Item 25 of the version in effect at the time, showed service schools, including major courses which were successfully completed and military sponsored courses completed in civilian schools and colleges during the period covered by the 
DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the location of his foreign language training is incorrectly shown on his DD Form 214.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant completed the 37-week Burmese Language course at the Foreign Language Center, DLI-Presidio of Monterey, CA from 18 September 1964 to 25 June 1965.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the correct location of his language training.  



BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: 

   a.  deleting the entry “USAINTS, Fort Holabird, Maryland, 37-Weeks, Language” from Item 25 of the applicant’s DD Form 214, dated 15 May 1968; and 

   b.  adding the entry “Foreign Language Center, DLI-Presidio of Monterey, CA, 37-Weeks, Language” to Item 25 of his DD Form 214.



															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016965



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016965



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007250

    Original file (20130007250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show completion of a 63-week language course. The applicant states block 14 (Military Education) of his DD Form 214 should show his 2010 completion of the 63-week Korean Language Basic Course at the Defense Language Institute (DLI). Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to enter the Korean Language Basic Course on the applicant's DD Form 214 at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003373

    Original file (20120003373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides his DD Form 214, a Certification of Military Service, correspondence from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), and an Army Language School Diploma. The applicant's complete military record is not available to the Board for review. Unfortunately, this probability alone is an insufficient basis for correcting his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007144

    Original file (20130007144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's contract, dated 16 August 2010, stated she was enlisting in MOS 35P for a bonus of $5,000 and she did not become MOSQ until 25 October 2012. As specified in her enlistment contract, she was required to become MOSQ within 24 months of her enlistment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records and the Army National Guard of the individual concerned be corrected to: * show she enlisted in the ARNG for MOS 35P and qualified for a $5,000 enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005735

    Original file (20110005735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following corrections to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 6 March 1992: * change rank and pay grade to sergeant/pay grade E-5 * change primary military occupational specialty (MOS) to 96B2O (Intelligence Analyst) * add secondary MOS 37F2O (formally 96F) (Psychological Operations Specialist) * add Basic Course Chinese-Mandarin * add Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) 2. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009628

    Original file (20080009628.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. In the applicant and counsel’s request to grant the applicant pro rata of recoupment of any SRB already paid by installments based upon the percentage of service completed, counsel provides many in-depth trains of logic which address whether the applicant obtained his SRB through fraud, whether the applicant’s discharge from his erroneous reenlistment contract constituted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017175C080213

    Original file (20070017175C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant stated that after being told that he could not be returned to active duty and not yet being cleared by his doctors to return to work, he applied for incapacitation pay. As a result, the Board recommends that that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he was retained on active duty in an ADME status from 10 October 2004 through 30 September 2005 and from 15 January 2007 through 7 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001348

    Original file (20080001348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His commander initiated an informal investigation to determine if his reenlistment was fraudulent; c. the applicant did not deliberately conceal any disqualifying factor in his reenlistment. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The IO determined that the applicant's reenlistment was neither fraudulent nor defective; rather, an erroneous reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005307C070206

    Original file (20050005307C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show that his permanent change of station (PCS) orders were issued as indeterminate temporary change of station (TCS) orders while allowing him to retain any and all PCS allowances he received. The evidence of record and the advisory opinion from the G-1 clearly show that the applicant has been disadvantaged by the issuance of the erroneous PCS orders. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008363

    Original file (20140008363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states: * the applicant served honorably for over 31 months * she was twice promoted and received numerous awards * she received improper medical treatment from Army medical providers for an injury that occurred while on active duty and as a result was unable to perform her duties as a Soldier * despite comments from the physical therapist attesting to the applicant's pain and weakness limitations, no Army doctor recommended an arthroscopic procedure for a potential SLAP (Superior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016823

    Original file (20090016823.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. award of the Bronze Star Medal, b. award of the Army Commendation Medal, and c. completion of the Arabic Language Course. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, a Defense Language Institute diploma, a DA Form 4980-5-WT (Bronze Star Medal Certificate), and a DA Form 4980-14 (Army Commendation Medal Certificate) as documentary evidence in support of this...