Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013179
Original file (20080013179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  6 November 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013179 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the entry, "Excess leave of 8 days from 24 Nov 67 Thru 1 Dec 67," be deleted from item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states that during his discharge process a personnel clerk counted 30 days of convalescent leave against his regular leave.  A warrant officer corrected his discharge pay, but the DD Form 214 was not corrected.  The 8-day period has a direct impact on his current Federal leave and retirement computation.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence, but he states his pay records should bear this out.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 


has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 6 January 1966.

3.  A DA Form 8-275-2 (Clinical Record Cover Sheet) shows the applicant was on convalescent leave for 14 days, from 22 September 1967 to 6 October 1967.

4.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 15 December 1967.  His separation orders show he had minus 8 days of accrued leave.  Item 30 of his DD Form 214 shows he was on 8 days of excess leave from 24 November 1967 through 1 December 1967.

5.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  The regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention has been considered; however, without his pay records/leave and earnings statements to verify his leave status during the period in question, it must be presumed that the information on his separation orders and DD Form 214 concerning excess leave is correct.

2.  The applicant's pay records and/or leave and earnings statements might verify his contention.  However, those records/documents are not available to the Board, and he has the burden of proving the error.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________XXX_________________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013179



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013179



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013236

    Original file (20100013236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, deletion of the entry "Excess leave of 11 days from 16 May 68 thru 26 May 68" from item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was not placed on excess leave during the period 16 May 1968 through 26 May 1968. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003012

    Original file (20130003012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was not paid based on his correct rank of specialist four (SP4)/E-4. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010811

    Original file (20100010811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He contends he never took excess leave and DFAS has never shown what days they considered to be excess leave. Subsequently, DFAS responded and informed the applicant his claim had been audited twice by Reserve pay and they would not do it again. DFAS records show the following debt collections in 2005 and 2006 (totaling $7,521.70): * Overpayment of basic pay and pay and allowances for 14-15 April 2005 - $484.45 * Leave period from 17 March 2005 to 1 April 2005 - $4,344.37 * Reimbursement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014550

    Original file (20140014550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Orders 042-0027, issued by Headquarters, National Training Center (NTC) and Fort Irwin, California, dated 11 February 2014 * two memoranda from his commander, subject: Discrepancy in Charged Leave Days Erroneous, both dated 24 April 2014 * DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave), for dates 12 December 2013 to 10 January 2014 * a memorandum, issued by U.S. Army Medical Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001604

    Original file (20070001604.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070001604 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's records show that he was AWOL for the period 23-26 May 1968. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 1 September 1968; therefore, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009304

    Original file (20090009304.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Among the important public policy considerations behind statutes of limitations, including the 6-year limitation for filing claims contained in this section of Title 31, U.S. Code, is relieving the government of the need to retain, access, and review old records for the purpose of settling stale claims, which are often difficult to prove or disprove. The applicant's FICA earnings for 1967 and 1968...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015482

    Original file (20130015482.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was charged regular leave while on convalescent leave in addition to being billed for treatment for an infection that occurred while on active duty. The applicant provides: a. Evidence that shows an orthopedic surgeon at MacDill Air Force Base, FL, recommended convalescent leave from 16 February to 11 March and 11 March to 11 April 2012. c. A Leave and Earnings Statement for 25 April 2012 that shows he began the period with a leave balance of 84 days, he was charged 84 days leave, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054870C070420

    Original file (2001054870C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show 14 days of ordinary leave for the period 27 July 1999 to 8 August 1999 be charged as convalescent leave. DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave) authorizing the applicant’s convalescent leave for the period 27 July 1999 to 8 August 1999 is not in his personnel records. This form further shows that an official of the Defense Military Pay Office contacted the Darnall Army Community Hospital and obtained the proper documents...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009811

    Original file (20120009811.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The U.S. Army Arctic Test Center, AK, published the following SO: * SO Number 22, dated 2 February 1968, awarding him primary MOS 67C and secondary MOS 68G * SO Number 124, dated 5 August 1968, awarding him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) 7. This form further shows he was serving in MOS 67C at the time of release from active duty and he was awarded or authorized the National Defense Service Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, and Sharpshooter Marksmanship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001925

    Original file (20110001925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report (OER)) covering the rating period 26 May 2009 through 12 January 2010 (hereafter referred to as the contested OER) from his official military personnel file (OMPF). c. Paragraph 2-12 stipulates that raters will provide their support forms, along with the senior rater's support forms, to the rated Soldier at the beginning of the rating period; discuss the scope of the rated Soldier's duty description with the rated...