Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015482
Original file (20130015482.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015482 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reimbursement of his medical expenses and erroneously-charged regular leave days.

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

   a.  He was charged regular leave while on convalescent leave in addition to being billed for treatment for an infection that occurred while on active duty.  On
2 February 2012, he had routine surgery to repair his knee.  He was due to be medically retired on 11 April 2012; however, he contracted a post-operative staph infection that required him to receive four additional knee surgeries.
   
   b.  His surgeon gave him two separate convalescent leave forms covering him from 16 February to 11 April 2012.  He retired due to temporary disability on 11 April 2012, but he feels he should have been extended on active duty since his final surgery was not until 10 May 2012.
   
   c.  He continued to be treated with prescription antibiotics, but since he was not extended on active duty while completing his treatment he incurred a cost share bill of $2,0131.96.  He paid the bill, but he wants to be reimbursed these medical expenses and the leave days he was erroneously charged.

3.  The applicant provides:

* 11 pages of medical notes
* 2 DA Forms 31 (Leave Request/Authorization)
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Numerous Leave and Earnings Statements
* Associated correspondence and a medical bill
* DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  With regard to the applicant's claim for reimbursement of $2,031.96 he was billed for and subsequently paid to his provider, the Community Base Warrior Transition Unit, Florida, has assisted the applicant with his claim.  On 5 June 2014, a staff member of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) contacted the applicant to ensure his claim was processed.  The applicant informed the staff member that there was no further action required in reference to this portion of his application; therefore, this portion of the applicant's request will not be further discussed in these proceedings.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 May 2003.  On 26 May 2006, he was released from active duty upon the completion of his required active duty service and transferred to a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit in Florida.  Item 16 (Days Accrued Leave Paid) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time indicates the applicant received payment for 50.5 days of accrued leave.

3.  On 13 February 2009, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.

4.  On 18 October 2011, the applicant underwent a PEB.  The board found the applicant was physically unfit, recommended a combined disability rating of
60 percent, and placed the applicant on the temporary disability retired list.  On
9 November 2011, the applicant concurred with the board's findings and he waived a formal hearing of his case.  On 2 December 2011, the board's findings were approved.

5.  On 11 April 2012, the applicant was retired due to temporary disability.  Item 16 of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time indicates he received payment for one day of accrued leave.

6.  The applicant provides:

   a.  Evidence that shows he underwent surgery on 16 February 2012, to have his right knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed.  He provides evidence of subsequent medical procedures on his knee culminating on 10 May 2012.
   b.  Evidence that shows an orthopedic surgeon at MacDill Air Force Base, FL, recommended convalescent leave from 16 February to 11 March and 11 March to 11 April 2012.

   c.  A Leave and Earnings Statement for 25 April 2012 that shows he began the period with a leave balance of 84 days, he was charged 84 days leave, and he earned one day of leave.

   d.  A copy of his final Leave and Earnings Statement, dated 27 April 2012, that shows he was paid for one day of accrued leave.

7.  During the processing of this case, on 22 October 2013, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Compensation and Entitlements Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1.  The advisory official stated that while recovering from surgery the applicant should have been on convalescent leave, which is a non-chargeable administrative leave period.  The official further stated that the ABCMR should support the applicant's request that his annual leave days charged while recovering from surgery be re-credited and reimbursed (cashed out) at separation.

8.  The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion but did not respond within the given time frame.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-10 (Leaves and Passes) prescribes the policies and mandated operating tasks for the leave and pass function of the Military Personnel System.  It states that payment of accrued leave up to a limit of 60 days is permissible one time during a military career.  It further states that the leave program is designed to encourage the use of leave as it accrues rather than to accumulate a large leave balance.  Soldiers who build their leave balance to the maximum level risk losing their leave should a situation occur that prevents or delays leave use.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows the applicant was paid a total of 51.5 days (of a maximum 60 days) of accrued leave throughout his military career.

2.  The evidence appears to show and the Chief, Compensation and Entitlements Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, agrees the applicant should have been in a convalescent leave status following his surgery on 16 February 2012.  Therefore, the applicant is due payment of 8.5 days of accrued leave based on his leave balance prior to his surgery.

3.  While it appears the applicant had an accrued leave balance of 84 days on  25 April 2012, had the error not occurred he would only have been eligible to be paid for 8.5 days of accrued leave.  The leave program is designed to encourage the use of leave as it accrues rather than to accumulate a large leave balance.  Soldiers who build their leave balance to the maximum level risk losing their leave should a situation occur that prevents or delays leave use.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's records should be corrected as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was on convalescent leave from 16 February to 11 April 2012 in lieu of regular leave and paying him for 8.5 days of unused accrued leave which was not paid upon his separation on 11 April 2012, provided he is otherwise eligible, as a result of this correction.



      _________X___________
													CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015482





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015482



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001370C070208

    Original file (20040001370C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Antonio Uribe | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence shows that the applicant did plan to use 22 days of accrued leave between 10 May 2003 and 31 May 2003, but that his intention was thwarted because of his medical emergency. Nonetheless, the applicant, although apparently on convalescent leave for 10 days from 6 May 2003 to 15 May 2003, although not considered authorized accrued leave as such, was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01234

    Original file (BC-2012-01234.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Further, the Board notes the applicant submitted no evidence to substantiate his claim his final payment was in error with respect to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010716

    Original file (20130010716.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His leave and earnings statements for 7 November 2007 and 15 November 2007 also show he had a leave balance of 47 days. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002152

    Original file (20080002152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Block 16 (Days Accrued Leave) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows zero amount of leave paid. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was paid 60 days accrued leave during her military career. Since there is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant was paid for the maximum amount of 60 days during her military career, it would be appropriate to pay her for 25.0 days of accrued leave and to amend her DD Form 214 for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005221

    Original file (20120005221.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His surgery was scheduled only a few days prior to his approved retirement date and his request for an extension beyond his approved retirement date was denied. He submits a DA Form 4187, dated 20 October 2011, indicating he requested an exception to policy to have his retirement date adjusted from 30 June to 30 November 2011 so the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) could offset the debt he acquired by being in an active duty status beyond his scheduled retirement date. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021564

    Original file (20130021564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. g. SLA authorizes Soldiers to carry forward up to 90 days of leave at the end of an FY (60 days of normal leave carry over plus 30 days of SLA). By law, there is no authority to grant SLA to Soldiers who lose leave due to injury or hospitalization.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016942

    Original file (20100016942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Defense Finance and Accounting Service submitted a response to a congressional inquiry on 4 August 2008 and stated the applicant: * separated with 34.5 days of accrued lump sum leave * accumulated 90 days of leave on 30 September 2007 (end of fiscal year) * wasn’t entitled to special leave accrual * was only authorized to carry forward no more than 60 days of leave * lost 30 days of accrued leave on 1 October 2007 7. The evidence of record does not show the applicant has been unjustly...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03621

    Original file (BC-2005-03621.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    An additional 30 days of convalescent leave was requested on 18 August 2005, so that he could rehabilitate at his home of record. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claim. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Feb 06.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015932C071029

    Original file (20060015932C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    I had the days on record and they charged me negative 40 days leave when I had the days by LES (Leave and Earnings Statement), DA Form 31, and orders. The applicant further states that he should not now be charged and be held accountable for the resultant indebtedness to the Government in the amount of $1,827.75 for receiving incorrect information from his chain of command about, in effect, his leave availability and its chargeability against his accrued leave account. Further, they are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003414

    Original file (20150003414.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003414 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, when he left the Army he had accrued a total of 76 days of leave. His LES for the period 1-31 July 2014, which shows he had a leave balance of 76 days and had been previously paid for 60 days of accrued leave.