Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003012
Original file (20130003012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130003012 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests payment of monies owed to him.

2.  The applicant states he was not paid based on his correct rank of specialist four (SP4)/E-4.

3.  The applicant provides copies of orders promoting him to the rank of private first class (PFC)/E-3 and SP4/E-4; U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders, dated 20 September 1972; his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge); and a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 17 October 1966, completed training, and was awarded military occupational specialty 65H (Locomotive Specialist).  

3.  The orders provided by the applicant show he was advanced to PFC/E-3, effective 27 August 1967, and he was advanced to SP4/E-4 effective
19 February 1968.

4.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 25 September 1968:

* Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) shows SP4 (T) temporary, "SEE ITEM 30"
* Item 30 (Remarks) states "5A DATE OF APT E3 (P) 27 AUG 67" 
* Item 5b (Pay Grade) lists "E4"
* Item 6 (Date of Rank) lists "14 Jul 67"

5.  Letter Orders Number 09-1379697, from the Office of the Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center, dated 20 September 1972, show the applicant was discharged effective 16 October 1972, in the rank of "SP4."

6.  He subsequently served in the Army National Guard from 3 May 1984 through 2 May 1988.  

7.  The available records do not include any pay records or leave and earnings statements.

8.  Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702 provides a 6-year statute of limitations on claims against the Government.

9.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  Paragraph 2-9 states that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.







DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant has not provided and the record does not contain any evidence that shows he was not properly paid.

2.  Without clear evidence of his being incorrectly paid an exception to the 6-year barring statue under Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702 would not be warranted. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003012



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003012



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003152

    Original file (20150003152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the rank and grade on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show specialist four (SP4)/E-4 and that he be paid the monies he was due for his separation pay when he was released from active duty on 16 September 1966, plus the interest accrued. His record contains: a. Regardless, the statute of limitations for a claim against the Government expired in 1972, 6 years after the date of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014160

    Original file (20090014160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document also shows the applicant's rank was SP4. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was REFRAD in the rank of SP4/E-4 with a DOR of 9 July 1972 because he held that rank when he was separated from active duty and also at the time he was discharged from the USAR. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show the correct rank, grade, and DOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012267

    Original file (20130012267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, there is no basis for correcting the rank shown on his DD Form 214. His DD Form 214 also shows he held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4 at the time of his release from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023196

    Original file (20110023196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2962 (Security Termination Statement and Debriefing Certificate), dated 20 September 1967; DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record), dated September 1967; and U.S. Army Accessions Command Form 170 (Army Reserve Personnel Data Review), dated 26 March 1968; all show his grade of SP4/E-4 lined through and entered by hand as SGT/E-5. The applicant requests his rank be corrected to show SGT on his DD Form 214. Therefore, the DA Form 2496 which shows he was recommended for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015217

    Original file (20140015217.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests correction of the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as that of SP5/E-5. He responded and provided a copy of SO Number 292 (his separation orders), issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Dix, on 19 October 1967 listing his rank as "SP5." Although his record is void of any orders promoting him to SP5/E-5 while on active duty, his DA Form 20 and a USAAC Form 368 shows that he was promoted to the rank/grade of SP5/E-5 effective 25 September 1967...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006770

    Original file (20130006770.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The instructions show for: (1) item 5a, enter the grade in which serving at the time of separation; (2) item 5b, enter the pay grade; and (3) item 6, enter the DOR for the grade shown in item 5a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from his DD Form 214 the entry in: * item 5a and adding "SP4" * item 5b and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021778

    Original file (20110021778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although there are no orders in the available records which show he was appointed to SP4, his 14 April 1972 orders for the Air Medal show his rank as SP4. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry in item 5a of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028333

    Original file (20100028333.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * His DD Form 214 shows his rank and grade as specialist four * He was promoted to sergeant/E-5 on 15 September 1967 3. The applicant provides: * Promotion orders * DD Form 214 * Discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * Honorable Discharge Certificate from the USAR CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014659

    Original file (20140014659.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214, effective date 11 April 1971 * DD Form 256A, dated 8 June 1976 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Records show the applicant was not promoted to SP4 until 1 April 1972, after his discharge from active duty on 11 April 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014692

    Original file (20140014692.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 31 March 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140014692 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Based upon this evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as SP5/E-5 (T), effective 29...