Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012372
Original file (20080012372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  16 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080012372 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his separation document, DD Form 214, be corrected to add his Air Medal and to show his rank as SP4, pay grade E-4.

2.  The applicant states that he has documentation to prove he was awarded the Air Medal and to show he was a SP4, pay grade E-4.

3.  The applicant provides documents which he lists on his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted and entered active duty on 2 April 1968.  He was awarded the military occupational specialty of light weapons infantryman and was promoted to pay grade E-4.

3.  While serving in Vietnam, on 5 June 1969 the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for failure to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty.  His punishment included a reduction from pay grade E-4 to pay grade E-3.

4.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 9 December 1969 due to physical unfitness and placed on the Retired List the following day.

5.  The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant shows his rank as PFC (private first class), pay grade E-3, and it does not show the applicant’s Air Medal.

6.  In conjunction with the applicant’s placement on the Retired List, a grade determination was made.  It was determined that he should be placed on the Retired List in the rank of SP4, pay grade E-4.  Accordingly, on 24 April 1972 his retirement orders were amended.

7.  On 4 April 2005, the applicant’s DD Form 214 was amended by adding the Air Medal and the applicant was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) to show this correction.  Therefore, this issue will not be further discussed in the Record of Proceedings.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 states that a soldier is separated from active duty in the rank held on the date of separation.

9.  Title 10, United States Code, section 1372, states that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an armed force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the temporary disability retired list under section 1202 or 1205 of this title, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following:

        (1) The grade or rank in which he is serving on the date when his name is placed on the temporary disability retired list or, if his name was not carried on that list, on the date when he is retired.

        (2) The highest temporary grade or rank in which he served satisfactorily, as determined by the Secretary of the armed force from which he is retired.


        (3) The permanent regular or reserve grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired and which was found to exist as a result of a physical examination.

        (4) The temporary grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired, if eligibility for that promotion was required to be based on cumulative years of service or years of service in grade and the disability was discovered as a result of a physical examination.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was reduced from pay grade E-4 to pay grade E-3.  As such, his DD Form 214 correctly shows the pay grade and rank he held at the time of his separation; PFC, pay grade E-3.

2.  While a grade determination was made that the applicant warranted placement on the Retired List in pay grade E-4, this does not affect his grade or rank on the date of his separation.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012372



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012372



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019611

    Original file (20100019611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 8 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019611 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He states: * his Army dream was to move up in the ranks * his unit was ambushed in Vietnam and both of his legs were wounded * the Army retired him and he couldn't fulfill his dream * he wants to be advanced on the Retired List so he can have a higher rank on his tombstone in Arlington 3. This service may consist of combined active service and service in the U.S. Army Reserve Control...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019408

    Original file (20120019408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record is void of any evidence showing he was ever promoted to the rank/grade of SP4/E-4 at any time during his service. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120019408 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007021

    Original file (20120007021.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his: * records to show he was retired in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 vice private first class (PFC)/E-3 * retirement certificate to show his rank as SP4 2. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to the rank of SP4 on 1 September 1984. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * correcting his records to show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009492

    Original file (20100009492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1968 * a copy of Special Orders Number 13, dated 16 January 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021275

    Original file (20140021275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 August 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140021275 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, other records show: * reference to Special Court-Martial Order Number 59, Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Dix, NJ, dated 26 June 1986 * DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) showing he was reduced to the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 effective 26 June 1986 * Special Court-Martial Order Number 12, Headquarters, Department of the Army,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105998C070208

    Original file (2004105998C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Delia R. Trimble | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1372 (10 USC 1372), as amended in 1996, provides the legal authority for the grade to be awarded to members retiring for physical disability. The evidence of record further confirms the applicant had been selected for promotion to SGT/E-5 prior to being processed for retirement by reason of physical disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057821C070420

    Original file (2001057821C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) contains an entry in block 38 (record of assignments) that shows he was medically evacuated from the RVN to Ireland Army Hospital, Fort Knox, Kentucky, and that he arrived there as a patient on 2 August 1969. Given the evidence of record in this case, the Board finds it reasonable to presume that the hospital commander at Fort Knox promoted the applicant in accordance with applicable regulations in effect at the time based...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018511

    Original file (20090018511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. He also submitted a copy of an AGPZ Form 977, dated 11 July 1969, showing his retired grade as SP4 in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372. There is no evidence to confirm he was promoted to pay grade E-4 prior to 9 September 1966 and available military records do not contain a copy of his retirement orders showing his highest grade held.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005137C070205

    Original file (20060005137C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 2 May 1969 and was subsequently permanently retired by reason of physical disability in the rank of SP4. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect in blocks 5a., 5b., and 6, that his rank is SP4, pay grade E-4, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056543C070420

    Original file (2001056543C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records also contain Department of the Army, U.S. Military Personnel Center (MILPERCEN) Orders Number D174-15, dated 24 September 1984, which placed him on the TDRL as a PFC/pay grade E-3 with an effective date of retirement as 22 October 1984 and with 80% disability. Law provides, in effect, that a service member may not be denied a promotion to which he or she would have otherwise been entitled were it not for the physical disability for which he or she was retired. Consistent with...