Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007021
Original file (20120007021.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 6 November 2012 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007021 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his:

* records to show he was retired in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 vice private first class (PFC)/E-3
* retirement certificate to show his rank as SP4

2.  The applicant states he is getting [retired] pay as an E-3 but he retired as an E-4.  His disability pay has been incorrect for 26 years.  He has tried many times to have his rank corrected but he never got any results.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), two certificates, and orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 August 1981 and he held military occupational specialty 31N (Tactical Circuit Controller).  He was promoted to the rank/grade of PFC/E-3 on 14 August 1982. 

3.  On 22 August 1984, a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened at Fort Sam Houston, TX, and diagnosed him with several unfitting conditions.  The MEB recommended referral to a physical evaluation board (PEB).  On 30 August 1984, he agreed with the board's findings.  These MEB proceedings show his rank as PFC.

4.  Orders Number 169-100, dated 29 August 1984, issued by Headquarters, Fort Sam Houston, TX, promoted him to the rank/grade of SP4/E-4, effective 1 September 1984.

5.  On 4 September 1984, an informal PEB convened at Fort Sam Houston, TX, and confirmed his unfitting disability of bilateral impairment of the knees, right greater than left.  The PEB found the applicant's condition prevented him from performing the duties required of his grade and military specialty and determined that he was physically unfit for duty.  He was rated under the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) code 5257 and assigned a 30-percent disability rating.  The PEB recommended his retirement and placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) because his condition was not sufficiently stable for final adjudication.  On 6 September 1984, he concurred with the board's findings and waived his right to a formal hearing.  These PEB proceedings show his rank as PFC.

6.  Orders Number D172-15, dated 20 September 1984, issued by the U.S. Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, VA, relieved him from duty effective 18 October 1984, by reason of temporary physical disability, and he was placed on the TDRL on 19 October 1984.  These orders show his rank as PFC and his retired rank as PFC.

7.  On 18 October 1984, he was honorably retired by reason of temporary physical disability and placed on the Retired List on 19 October 1984.  He completed 3 years, 2 months, and 5 days of net active service.  Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and item 4b (Pay Grade) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows the entries "SP4" and "E-4," respectively.

8.  On 14 May 1986, an informal PEB convened at Fort Gordon, GA, and confirmed his unfitting disability of bilateral impairment of the knees.  The PEB found the applicant's condition improved somewhat but he remained unfit for continued military service.  His rating under VASRD code 5257 and 30-percent disability rating remained the same.  The PEB recommended he be permanently retired as his condition had stabilized and was not expected to improve.  After being apprised of his rights, the applicant failed to make an election and the findings and recommendation of the board was deemed accepted.  These PEB proceedings show his rank as PFC.

9.  Orders Number D121-4, dated 30 June 1986, issued by the U.S. Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, VA, removed him from the TDRL and permanently retired him effective 15 July 1986 in "his current grade or rank."  These orders show his rank as PFC.

10.  His records contain a DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 30 June 1986, wherein it shows his active duty rank as "PFC," and his retired rank as "PFC."  

11.  The applicant provides a Certificate of Retirement, dated 16 July 1986, wherein his rank is shown as PFC.

12.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, states that any member of an Armed Force who is retired for physical disability is retired in the grade or rank in which serving on the date his/her name is placed on the TDRL. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to the rank of SP4 on 1 September 1984.  Although his DD Form 214 was prepared showing he held the rank of SP4 at the time he was retired from active duty on 18 October 1984, this was apparently overlooked and he was placed on the TDRL on 19 October 1984 in the rank of PFC.  This error was compounded when he was permanently retired on 15 July 1986 in the rank of PFC.  Therefore, he is entitled to the requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* correcting his records to show he was placed on the TDRL on 19 October 1984 in the rank of SP4
* correcting his records to show he was permanently retired on 16 July 1986 in the rank of SP4
* paying him all retired pay due as a result of this correction
* issuing him a Certificate of Retirement showing he was honorably retired on 16 July 1986 in the rank of SP4



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007021



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007021



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056543C070420

    Original file (2001056543C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records also contain Department of the Army, U.S. Military Personnel Center (MILPERCEN) Orders Number D174-15, dated 24 September 1984, which placed him on the TDRL as a PFC/pay grade E-3 with an effective date of retirement as 22 October 1984 and with 80% disability. Law provides, in effect, that a service member may not be denied a promotion to which he or she would have otherwise been entitled were it not for the physical disability for which he or she was retired. Consistent with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011937

    Original file (20130011937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the 1986 formal temporary disability retired list (TDRL) physical evaluation board (PEB) finding and recommendations to show he was assigned a 30-percent (%) vice 20% disability rating. On 14 April 1986, a formal TDRL PEB convened and based on a review of the medical evidence of record, presentation by counsel, and the applicant's testimony, the PEB again found the applicant's conditions prevented him from performing the duties required of his grade and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007760

    Original file (20090007760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that instead of being discharged with a 20 percent disability rating on 25 October 1994 he was instead retired with a minimum of a 30 percent disability rating on that same date. An award or change in the disability rating granted by the VA would not call into question the application of the fitness standards and the disability ratings assigned by proper military medical authorities during the applicant’s processing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015769

    Original file (20110015769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the PEB recommended placing him on the TDRL by reason of temporary physical disability. He was issued a DD Form 214 upon conclusion of his active service and transfer to the TDRL in March 1983. A TDRL PEB later determined the applicant's medical condition had resolved and the board found him to be physically fit for duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008736

    Original file (20130008736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was rated with a higher percentage of disability and placed on the permanent disability retired list. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably retired on 30 August 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24e(2), based on physical disability: temporary. The evidence of record also shows that, based on a periodic physical examination, a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028715

    Original file (20100028715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 13 December 2004 DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) as follows: * Add Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) code 5241 for cervical fusion * Add VASRD code 5003 for degenerative arthritis * Show a 60% combined total disability rating * Payment of back pay and allowances from 5 February 2005 (date placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL)) to the present 2. On 22 October 2004, a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013785

    Original file (20110013785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she was medically retired by reason of physical disability vice being removed from the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) with entitlement to severance pay. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. The PEB found her knee condition prevented her from performing her military duties and determined that she was physically...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015648

    Original file (20110015648.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on a review of the objective medical evidence of record and considering the physical requirements for reasonable performance of duties required of his grade and military specialty, the PEB found the applicant fit for duty within the limitations of his physical profile. Based on the review of the TDRL examination, the PEB found the applicant fit for duty and noted that: * There are presently no restrictions which would preclude the applicant from returning to military service and no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000869

    Original file (20090000869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a self-authored statement, dated 10 January 2009, and several medical documents, reports, notes, and examinations, through the DVA and/or civilian medical providers, dated on miscellaneous dates in 2008, which were not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, they are considered new evidence and as such warrant consideration by the Board. On 30 April 1999, a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened at Fort Benning, Georgia, to evaluate the applicant’s medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008209

    Original file (20110008209 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB determined he remained unfit, awarded him a 10-percent disability rating, and recommended his separation from the Army with entitlement to severance pay. The evidence of record shows the applicant presented a medical condition and subsequently underwent an MEB which recommended his referral to a PEB. A TDRL PEB later determined his medical condition continued to render him unfit and recommended his separation with entitlement to severance pay.