Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056543C070420
Original file (2001056543C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 13 September 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001056543


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Beverly A. Young Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. John E. Denning Member
Mr. Terry L. Placek Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as specialist four (SP4/pay grade E-4) and that he be paid all back pay and allowances to which he is entitled.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was promoted to SP4/pay grade E-4 by orders, dated 30 July 1984. In support of his application, he provides a copy of his DD Form 214, a letter to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), dated 4 March 2001, 82d Airborne Division promotion orders, dated 30 July 1984, a Department of Veterans Affairs notification letter, dated 20 December 2000, and a photocopy of his retired military I.D. card.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 August 1982 for a period of two years. He successfully completed basic and advanced individual training and parachutist training. He was assigned to Fort Bragg, North Carolina, as an airborne infantryman. The applicant was retired on 22 October 1984 by reason of physical disabilty.

5. A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 18 August 1983, in the applicant’s records promoted him to private first class (PFC/pay grade E-3) with effective date of 18 August 1983.

6. Headquarters, 82d Airborne Division Orders Number 144-94, dated 30 July 1984, submitted by the applicant shows he was promoted to the rank of SP4/pay grade E-4 with an effective date of 18 August 1984.

7. Records show the applicant sustained a severe arm injury on 2 June 1984. This injury was determined to be in the line of duty. As a result of his injury, the applicant was reassigned from his unit at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, to Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) to undergo disability processing. WRAMC Orders Number 137-25, dated 13 July 1984, assigned the applicant to the WRAMC Medical Holding Company effective 20 July 1984.

8. On 14 August 1984, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) at WRAMC determined that the applicant was unfit for duty. The Board recommended a combined rating of 80% and that the applicant be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with re-examination during September 1985.

9. His personnel records contain a DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 24 September 1984 which shows his retired grade as “PFC”. His records also contain Department of the Army, U.S. Military Personnel Center (MILPERCEN) Orders Number D174-15, dated 24 September 1984, which placed him on the TDRL as a PFC/pay grade E-3 with an effective date of retirement as 22 October 1984 and with 80% disability.

10. Records show the applicant underwent a TDRL re-examination and was considered by a PEB on 25 October 1985. The Board found that the applicant was unfit and recommended a combined rating of 30% and that the applicant be permanently retired from the service.

11. The applicant’s records contain a second DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 26 November 1985, which shows his retired grade as “PFC”. His records also contain U.S. Army MILPERCEN Orders Number D222-21, dated 26 November 1985, which removed him from the TDRL on 10 December 1985 and permanently retired him effective 11 December 1985 in his current grade of rank with a 30% disability rating. These orders show the applicant’s grade as “PFC”.

12. Title 10, United States Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has an impairment rated at least 30 percent disabling.

13. Section 1372 of Title 10, United States Code, governs the grade for members placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) or retired for physical disability. In pertinent part, the law states that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of the armed force who is retired for physical disability under Section 1201 or 1204 of Title 10 or whose name is placed on the TDRL under Section 1202 or 1205 of Title 10 is entitled to the permanent regular or reserve grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired.

14. Army Regulation 635-5 provides instructions for the preparation of the
DD Form 214. It states, in pertinent part, that item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and
4b (Pay Grade) will be completed to show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant was promoted effective 18 August 1984 to the rank of SP4/pay grade E-4 by 82d Airborne orders, dated 30 July 1984. However, the applicant had been assigned to the WRAMC Medical Holding Detachment, effective 20 July 1984. Therefore, the 82d Airborne Division did not have the authority to promote the applicant to SP4/pay grade E-4 since he was assigned to the WRAMC at the time.

2. Law provides, in effect, that a service member may not be denied a promotion to which he or she would have otherwise been entitled were it not for the physical disability for which he or she was retired.

3. Based on the foregoing, the Board has concluded that the applicant would have been promoted to SP4/pay grade E-4 at his unit in the 82d Airborne Division had it not been for his transfer to WRAMC for disability processing and ultimately his placement on the TDRL and retirement for physical disability. Consistent with applicable law, the Board has determined the applicant should not be denied promotion to SP4/pay grade E-4 as a result of his placement on the TDRL and his retirement for disability.

4. In view of the foregoing facts and determinations, the applicant is entitled to:

         a. Promotion to SP4/pay grade E-4 effective 18 August 1984;

         b. Correction of his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 22 October 1984 to show in item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) the entry “SP4” and item 4b (Pay Grade) the entry “E-4”;

         c. Correction of the DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 24 September 1984, to show the applicant’s active duty grade and retired grade at the time of placement on the TDRL was “SP4/E-4” instead of “PFC”;

         d. Correction of U.S. Army MILPERCEN Orders Number D174-15, dated 24 September 1984, to show the retired grade of the applicant was “SP4/E-4” instead of “PFC”;

         e. Correction of the DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 26 November 1985, to show in item 3 (Retired Grade) and in item 10 (Retired Pay) the entries “SP4/E-4 instead of “PFC”;

         f. Correction of U.S. Army MILPERCEN Orders Number D222-21, dated 26 November 1985, to show the applicant’s rank is SP4/pay grade E-4 instead of PFC; and

         g. Payment of all back pay and allowances and back retired pay to which he is entitled based on correction of all records to show that he was promoted to SP4/E-4 effective 18 August 1984.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records be corrected by showing:

         a. by showing that the individual concerned was promoted to the rank SP4/pay grade E-4 effective 18 August 1984;

         b. by showing in item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) the entry “SP4” and in item 4b (Pay Grade) the entry “E-4” on his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 22 October 1984;

         c. by showing on the DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 24 September 1984, that his active duty grade and retired grade at the time of placement on the TDRL was “SP4/E-4” instead of “PFC”;

         d. by amending U.S. Army MILPERCEN Orders Number D222-21, dated 26 November 1985, to show his rank is SP4/pay grade E-4 instead of PFC; and

         e. by showing on his DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 26 November 1985, in item 3 (Retired Grade) and in item 10 (Retired Pay) the entries “SP4/E-4 instead of “PFC”; and

         f. by amending U.S. Army MILPERCEN Orders Number D222-21, dated 26 November 1985, to show his rank is SP4/pay grade E-4 instead of PFC.

2. That, upon completion of corrections to all records and orders, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service audit the applicant’s active duty pay account and retired pay account to determine all monies due to the applicant, if any, and that the applicant be paid all monies due to him, if any.

BOARD VOTE:

FNE____ JED_____ TLP_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  Fred N. Eichorn_______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001056543
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20010913
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19841022
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY Title 10 USC 1202
DISCHARGE REASON Physical Disability Temporary
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 129.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013982

    Original file (20130013982.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he held the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of his records to show he held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4. Although the bar to reenlistment was later removed, there is no evidence showing he was properly advanced to PFC/E-3 at a later date prior to being placed on the TDRL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508617C070209

    Original file (9508617C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The order removing the applicant from the TDRL and permanently retiring him should be amended to show his rank as SP4. The applicant should be issued a certificate of retirement showing his rank and pay grade as SP4 E-4. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected: a. by showing that the individual concerned was removed from the from the TDRL and permanently retired in the rank of SP4 on 1 March 1982, and b. by issuing the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076495C070215

    Original file (2002076495C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This law applies both at the time a member is placed on the TDRL or the Retired List based on a permanent disability. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was advanced to the rank and pay grade of SPC/E-4 on 1 October 1985, and that he held that rank and pay grade on the date of his REFRAD on 30 April 1986. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was placed on the TDRL in the rank and pay grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007021

    Original file (20120007021.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his: * records to show he was retired in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 vice private first class (PFC)/E-3 * retirement certificate to show his rank as SP4 2. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to the rank of SP4 on 1 September 1984. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * correcting his records to show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609515C070209

    Original file (9609515C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A Medical Evaluation Board (MEBD), dated 25 November 1986, indicates that the applicant’s pay grade was E-1, and recommended that he be referred to a physical evaluation board (PEB). A DA Form 3713, dated 7 November 1988, shows his active duty and retired pay grade as E-1. The Board notes that the applicant’s leave and earnings statement indicates that he was advanced to pay grade E-2 effective 1 September 1986, and that the DA Form 2A and DA Form 2-1 indicate that his date of rank for pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009492

    Original file (20100009492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1968 * a copy of Special Orders Number 13, dated 16 January 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105998C070208

    Original file (2004105998C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Delia R. Trimble | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1372 (10 USC 1372), as amended in 1996, provides the legal authority for the grade to be awarded to members retiring for physical disability. The evidence of record further confirms the applicant had been selected for promotion to SGT/E-5 prior to being processed for retirement by reason of physical disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010699C071029

    Original file (20060010699C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010699 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his discharge date and rank at discharge be corrected. The evidence of record shows he was advanced to PFC, E-3 by the time he was placed on the TDRL on 21 April 1987.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019408

    Original file (20120019408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record is void of any evidence showing he was ever promoted to the rank/grade of SP4/E-4 at any time during his service. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120019408 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511976C070209

    Original file (9511976C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 25 July 1995 the WRAMC medical holding company first sergeant stated that the applicant was assigned to that unit from 3 October 1994 to 30 May 1995, and that he was eligible for promotion and should have been promoted. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), shows his rank as private, pay grade E-2, and his date of rank as 21 March 1994. The promotion action [although erroneous] by the applicant’s infantry unit commander on 1 May 1995 adds credence to...