Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012144
Original file (20080012144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        02 OCTOBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080012144 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) be corrected to show that he served in Schloss Kaserne, Butzbach Germany from 1964 to 1965.

2.  The applicant states that he served with the 2nd Battalion, 18th Field Artillery, 7th Army, when he was assigned to Germany.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  After completing 1 year, 3 months and 11 days of total prior active service in the Army, the applicant reenlisted in the Army on 7 August 1964, for 4 years, in the pay grade of E-3.  His records show that he was in Korea at the time of his reenlistment and that he was transferred to Germany on 19 October 1964.

3.  The applicant departed Germany on 22 November 1965 in route to Vietnam.  His records show that he arrived in Vietnam on 10 January 1966.

4.  The applicant returned to the Continental United States on 9 January 1967.  He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 6 August 1968 and he was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation.  The DD Form 214 that he was furnished at the time of his REFRAD shows that he had completed 2 years, 1 month, and 13 days of Foreign and/or Sea Service.  His DD Form 214 also shows “USARPAC” as the place of his Foreign and/or Sea Service.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater in which service was performed will be entered on the DD Form 214 in Item Number 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he had 2 years, 1 month and 13 days of Foreign and/or Sea Service.

2.  Although “USARPAC” is reflected on his DD Form 214 as the place that he completed his Foreign and/or Sea Service, his service in Germany from 19 October 1964 through 22 November 1965 is included in Item 22c on his DD Form 214 along with his service in Vietnam.  There are no provisions for entering all units served with, except the last unit of assignment, on the DD Form 214.

3.  In accordance with the applicable regulation, the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater in which service was performed will be entered on the DD Form 214.  The last theater in which he served was “USARPAC” and therefore, this information was properly included in Item 22c on his DD Form 214.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012144



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012144



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001030

    Original file (20080001030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant relief in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018148

    Original file (20080018148.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 20 June 1966 for 4 years. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his DD Form 214, dated 25 November 1969, item 22c, should be corrected to show a credit of 2 years, 4 months, and 26 days foreign service and USARPAC/Korea should be entered to correctly show the last theater and country in which the applicant served. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005998

    Original file (20090005998.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he served in Germany and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). Evidence of record shows in item 22c of the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 16 September 1967, he served a total of 1 year and 11 months overseas. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his DD Form 214 by adding USARPAC to item 22c; b. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020088

    Original file (20140020088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his service record should show his service in Vietnam. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), the National Defense Service Medal; and c. Item 30 does not show he served in Vietnam; however, it shows he served in USAREUR from 28 July 1961 to 15 July 1964; USARPAC from 30 September 1965 to 1 September 1966; and USAREUR from 30 November 1967 to 26 November 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008860

    Original file (20130008860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the United States Army Europe - Germany from 30 December 1965 to 8 June 1966, a total of 5 months and 10 days. The regulation requires the preparer to enter in item 22c the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered on the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater service was performed. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his total amount of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002103

    Original file (20130002103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Item 24 shows he was authorized one overseas service bar; however, he served in Vietnam for three 6-month periods during this period of service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016224

    Original file (20100016224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The statements the applicant submits are from two individual who attest that the applicant’s foreign service during the period shown on his DD Form 214 was in Vietnam. The regulation in effect at the time provided that the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which the service was performed would be entered in item 22c. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022316

    Original file (20110022316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. d. DD Form 214 for the period 15 December 1968 through 30 September 1972 which shows in item 22c completion of 1 year of foreign service and in item 30 (Remarks) the entry "Vietnam - Yes 1 October 1970 to 30 September 1971." As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006278

    Original file (20090006278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in Vietnam and Thailand and award of additional foreign service credit for Vietnam. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 does not indicate that he served in Vietnam and Thailand or document his foreign service credit for Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in USARPAC/Thailand from 21 June 1967 to 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021978

    Original file (20120021978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the amount of foreign service credit shown in: * Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 22 October 1968 * Item 12f (Foreign Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 7 April 1989 2. The evidence of record shows during the applicant’s period of service from 24 August 1964...