Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011792
Original file (20080011792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        13 NOVEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080011792 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his military occupational specialty (MOS) shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be changed from 94B (Cook) to 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

2.  The applicant states that he joined the Army in 1966, enlisted in the 82nd Airborne Division and the 101st Airborne as an Infantryman, and served in the infantry until he was discharged.  He also states that nowhere in his records are orders where he trained or worked as a cook, but that his DD Form 214 shows that he was a cook.  

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of this application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  A portion of the applicant’s military records are not available for review.  His military records appear to have been reconstructed at some point during his military service.  However, there are sufficient remaining documents available to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The available records show that the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 August 1966 for the Airborne Army Career Group Program, but no specific MOS.  He completed initial entry training and airborne training, and then served a tour in Vietnam from 12 May 1967 to 26 May 1968.  He was then reassigned to Fort Bragg, North Carolina where he served until he was honorably released from active duty on 7 September 1969.

4.  Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that his MOS at the time of his release from active duty was 94B1P, which identified him as a cook with an additional skill identifier "P" showing he was airborne qualified.  The applicant signed item 32 of this document, attesting to the accuracy of the information contained on that form.

5.  The preponderance of his available orders, including orders which officially awarded him MOS 94B on 31 August 1968 and his separation orders published on 5 September 1969, show that his MOS was 94B and not 11B.

6.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his MOS shown on his DD Form 214 should be changed from 94B to 11B.

2.  While the applicant may have performed duties in MOS 11B as an infantryman at some point in his military career, the preponderance of the evidence shows that his awarded MOS at the time of his release from active duty was 94B1P.  The applicant also signed his DD Form 214 in block 32 (Signature of Person Being Transferred or Discharged), which is his verification that his MOS was correct as annotated at the time of his release from active duty.

3.  The applicant failed to provide evidence and there is no evidence in the available records which conclusively proves his MOS was 11B instead of 94B.  Regrettably, in view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient basis upon which to grant relief to the applicant in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War, and wishes to thank the applicant for his service in arms.



      ________XXX______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011792



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011792



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015689

    Original file (20130015689.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 22 (MOS's) the entries: (1) secondary (S), 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman), 5 November 1970; and (2) primary (P), 94B, (Cook) 6 September 1971. b. item 27 (Military Education) the entry Light Weapons Infantryman, 11B, Fort Polk, LA, 9 weeks, 1970. c. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he served as an 11B Rifleman from 27 January 1971 through 6 September 1971 and as a 94B Cook from 7 September 1971 through 7 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001684

    Original file (20150001684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows in Item 30 (Remarks) that he was a cook in the RVN. A DA Form 20 in which item 22 (MOS) lists his primary MOS as 94B (Cook) with an effective date of 11 September 1970, and a secondary MOS as 11B (Infantryman) with an effective date of 21 October 1971. c. Two DA Forms 2627-1 that show: * he received two Article 15’s in the RVN for sleeping on post and for failing to go to his appointed place of duty for guard formation; he indicates this proves his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005328

    Original file (20110005328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 23a his MOS as 94B * item 24 no award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Based on Army Regulation 600-8-22, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge requires service in an infantry MOS in an infantry unit engaged in active ground combat with the enemy. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015042

    Original file (20090015042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his records be corrected awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge and showing he served in the military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (light weapons infantryman). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following pertinent information: a. award of primary MOS 94B effective 24 January 1969; b. award of secondary MOS 11B effective 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073795C070403

    Original file (2002073795C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart or the Combat Infantryman Badge and the MOS reflected on his discharge document is wrong. In his records are Headquarters, 101 st Airborne Division, General Orders Number 3022, dated 27 June 1968, awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015293

    Original file (20110015293.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Although the applicant's record shows he was awarded 11B as a secondary MOS and performed the duties of an 11B while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, his record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence showing he was awarded 11B as his primary MOS at any time. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014455

    Original file (20100014455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he served in duty MOS 94A (Cook Helper) or 94B throughout his military service; it does not show any entries for service in an infantry duty MOS. His records do not contain orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. Notwithstanding his and his former platoon sergeants' sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028933

    Original file (20100028933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that he was never a cook and his MOS on his DD Form 214 should be changed to MOS 11B. Evidence of record shows that since being awarded primary MOS 94B, he performed duties as a cook up until his release from active duty. Therefore, MOS 94B is correctly entered on the applicant's DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003928

    Original file (20110003928.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B and award of the Combat Infantryman Badge 2. c. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he served in duty MOS 94B throughout his military service; it does not show any entries for service in an infantry duty MOS. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant's MOS was 94B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024494

    Original file (20100024494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Item 27 (Military Schools) shows he successfully completed the 8-week Cook course and he was awarded MOS 94B in 1967. c. Item 31 (Foreign Service) shows he served an overseas tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam from 24 January 1968 through 23 January 1969. d. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that...