Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005328
Original file (20110005328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110005328 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show in:

* item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman)
* item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) award of the Combat Infantryman Badge

2.  He states that during his tour in Vietnam in 1967, he transferred his duty assignment to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 47th Infantry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division Scout Platoon as an armored personnel carrier driver.  This occurred while he was in the field approximately April 1967, but his records never changed.  He states his call code was R38.

3.  He provides no additional documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 


3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 December 1965.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training.  Special Orders Number 159, published by Headquarters, Fort Polk, LA, dated 21 June 1966, show he was awarded MOS 94B (Cook).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

* item 22 (MOS) he was awarded MOS 94B on 10 April 1967
* item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 10 January through 14 November 1967
* item 38 (Record of Assignments) he performed duties as a cook in MOS 94B in Vietnam while assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 47th Infantry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division
* item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge

4.  His service record does not contain orders which show he was awarded MOS 11B or award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 15 November 1967 as an overseas returnee.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 23a his MOS as 94B
* item 24 no award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.

7.  Additionally, U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations), Appendix V, states that during the Vietnam era the Combat 


Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.  It further stated that the criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and that the Combat Infantryman Badge was the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service.  Further, “the Combat Infantryman Badge is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day to day combat.”

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  The version in effect at the time directed the primary MOS code number and title would be entered in item 23a.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s service record shows he completed training as a cook and he was properly awarded MOS 94B by official orders.  There are no orders in the applicant's record and he did not provide any orders that show he was awarded MOS 11B.  As such, his MOS of 94B is properly recorded in item 23a of his DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting this portion of his request.

2.  Based on Army Regulation 600-8-22, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge requires service in an infantry MOS in an infantry unit engaged in active ground combat with the enemy.  The applicant's service record does not contain evidence that shows he met all the requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting this portion of his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005328



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005328



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023239

    Original file (20110023239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When he completed the training, he was assigned to an infantry unit and performed duties as an 11B from December 1968 to June 1969. There are three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge: the Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat. However, the evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007374

    Original file (20090007374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was recommended for and was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for his heroic action on 18 November 1967 and that as an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit in the Republic of Vietnam, he should have received the CIB. Item 32 (Prior Service) of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record) shows that on the date of his discharge for the purpose of reenlistment, he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 111.07 (Infantryman) and was assigned to Company D,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073795C070403

    Original file (2002073795C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart or the Combat Infantryman Badge and the MOS reflected on his discharge document is wrong. In his records are Headquarters, 101 st Airborne Division, General Orders Number 3022, dated 27 June 1968, awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001447

    Original file (20150001447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His first sergeant advised him that personnel assigned to Company E were awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and at the next company award ceremony he would receive that award too. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to an infantry Soldier assigned or attached to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participates in such ground combat. To award the Combat Infantryman Badge, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074066C070403

    Original file (2002074066C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant contends that he is entitled to the Combat Infantryman Badge, evidence of record shows that he served in MOS 94B (cook) during his assignment in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024494

    Original file (20100024494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Item 27 (Military Schools) shows he successfully completed the 8-week Cook course and he was awarded MOS 94B in 1967. c. Item 31 (Foreign Service) shows he served an overseas tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam from 24 January 1968 through 23 January 1969. d. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005139

    Original file (20090005139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge under the authority of Special Orders Number 181, issued by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, in 1967. Notwithstanding the entry shown on his DA Form 20 that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge under the authority of Special Orders Number 181, issued by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017192

    Original file (20080017192.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect during the Vietnam era, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to show the Good Conduct Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the appropriate number of service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal, two Overseas Service Bars, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Meritorious Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028933

    Original file (20100028933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that he was never a cook and his MOS on his DD Form 214 should be changed to MOS 11B. Evidence of record shows that since being awarded primary MOS 94B, he performed duties as a cook up until his release from active duty. Therefore, MOS 94B is correctly entered on the applicant's DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011147

    Original file (20070011147.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant is entitled to the first award of the Good Conduct Medal, for the period 20 October 1966 to 18 October 1968, based on completion of a period of qualifying military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding...