Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010350
Original file (20080010350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       13 November 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010350 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be advanced to the grade of Sergeant First Class (SFC/E-7) on the Retired List.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he performed the duties of a Platoon Sergeant with distinction.  Platoon Sergeant is normally an E-7 billet and he was promised he would be promoted.  Instead he was removed from his duties as a Platoon Sergeant and assigned as a Squad Leader.

3.  The applicant provides:

	a.  A two-page “Narrative.”

	b.  Four DA Forms 2166-6 (Enlisted Evaluation Report).

	c.  DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report).

	d.  Two DA Forms 1379 (Unit Record of Reserve Training)

	e.  A diploma, dated 18 May 1984.

	f.  A Certificate of Training, dated April 1984.

	g.  A National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service).

	h.  A DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant served in the Army National Guard and received a 20-Year Letter notifying him of his entitlement to non-regular retired pay at age 60.  He was transferred to the Retired Reserve and, on 24 October 2002, he became eligible for non-regular retired pay.  He made application on 14 February 2004.

2.  The applicant’s highest rank was Staff Sergeant (SSG/E-6); he was promoted to that rank on 15 September 1976.  In 1985, his principal duty was changed to that of Platoon Sergeant with Troop C, 1st Squadron, 104th Cavalry, Philadelphia, PA.  He held this assignment for slightly more than 1 year before reverting to a principal duty of Section Leader and Squad Leader.

3.  There is no record of the applicant ever being promoted beyond the rank of SSG.

4.  10 USC § 3964 provides each retired member of the Army who is retired with less than 30 years of active service is entitled, when his/her active service plus service on the retired list totals 30 years, to be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade in which he/she served on active duty satisfactorily (or, in the case of a member of the National Guard, in which he/she served on full-time duty satisfactorily), as determined by the Secretary of the Army.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant is requesting advancement on the Retired List from SSG to SFC.

2.  In order to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade held satisfactorily, the applicant would have had to actually hold that higher grade.  Simply stated, he must have been promoted to and paid in that rank and grade, and he must have served at that grade for the required statutory or regulatory period of time.  Merely serving in, “acting as,” or holding a position or job title authorized a higher grade is not sufficient.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010350





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010350



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016946

    Original file (20080016946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents as new evidence: self authored statement; Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings AR20060008821; electronic mail (e-mail) Messages; DD Form 3349 (Physical Profile); Adjutant General’s Department, Austin, Texas, Orders Number 283-1060, dated 10 October 2002; Headquarters, III Corps and Fort Hood Orders Number 239-0332, dated 27 August 2002, and Orders Number 136-4, dated 16 May 2002; DA Form 2-1 (Personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007324

    Original file (20140007324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Orders D-06-036713, dated 4 June 1985 * DD Form 214, ending on 9 February 1983 * ARNG Retirement Points History Statement * Retirement Orders P08-926117, dated 25 August 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to the rank/grade of SFC/E-7, on 16 January 1980, and he held that grade until 9 February 1983 when he was honorably released from active duty and discharged from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013486

    Original file (20120013486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The additional instructions state: * the promotion was not valid and this order will be revoked if the Soldier concerned is not in a promotable status on the effective date of the promotion * the Soldier must enroll in the appropriate NCOES course within 90 days of the effective date of promotion or release from active duty * failure to enroll, attend, or complete any portion (of the NCOES) within the allowable time frames will result in referral to a reduction board in accordance with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006834

    Original file (20110006834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. By law, a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012508

    Original file (20140012508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests advancement on the Retired List to the next higher grade sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7). He provides five NCOER's showing his rank as SSG with duty title of Platoon Sergeant or Motor Sergeant. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017795

    Original file (20130017795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His DA Form 2-1 indicates in block 5 (Assignment Consideration): * he was not recommended for further service on 13 June 1986 * he had been removed from the SFC/E-7 Selection list * his bar to reenlistment was reviewed and it was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064200C070421

    Original file (2001064200C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In support of his application, the applicant submitted an extract from an Army Times newspaper, dated 8 May 1978, which contained the names of individuals who were selected for promotion and placed on the SFC/E-7 promotion list. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he should be advanced to the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7 on the Retired List because he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015615

    Original file (20070015615.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070015615 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's records show that he was selected for promotion to SFC/E-7 by the 1996 Department of the Army Centralized Promotion Board. It states, in pertinent part, that warrant officer and enlisted members of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007609

    Original file (20100007609.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100007609 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was placed on the Retired List as a sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7. The orders show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of SSG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067757C070402

    Original file (2002067757C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: On two...