Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009916
Original file (20080009916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080009916 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for duty performed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his commander was unfamiliar with the regulations regarding awarding the CIB and, therefore, did not submit the applicant for the award.  The applicant also states, in effect, that he was engaged by enemy fire, both direct and indirect, while performing combat duties in Iraq.  The applicant states, in effect, that no supporting evidence of the incident for which he is requesting the CIB was presented to his command.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and a copy of a self-authored statement in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show that he was ordered to active duty in the Army from the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) on 27 April 2006 in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).  The highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was sergeant first class.

2.  Item 18 (remarks) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he served in Iraq from 21 September 2006 through 8 September 2007, and that during his service in Iraq he was assigned to 1st Battalion, 185th Division, performing duties in MOS 11B.
3.  On 10 October 2007, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the CAARNG.

4.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal (2nd award), Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Iraq Campaign Medal, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, Armed Forces Reserve Medal with “M” Device (3rd award).

5.  Item 13 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the CIB.

6.  The applicant submitted an unnotarized self-authored statement which states that his convey came under indirect fire attack while preparing to depart the Bashra air station on or about 4 January.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  On or after 18 September 2001, a Soldier must be an Army infantry or special forces officer (SSI 11 or 18) in the grade of colonel or below, or an Army enlisted Soldier or warrant officer with an infantry or special forces MOS, who has satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry, ranger or special forces unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat, to close with and destroy the enemy with direct fires.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-2, paragraph 8-6b(5)(b) also provides, in pertinent part, that a Soldier must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or special forces primary duty position, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy.  Improvised explosive device (IED), vehicle-borne IED (VBIED), and the like are direct fire weapons.  While no fixed, qualifying distance from an explosion of these devices can be established, a commander should consider the entirety of the combat situation when considering award of the CIB.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant's contention that his records should be corrected to show award of the CIB was carefully considered and found to be without merit. 

2.  The applicant submitted a self-authored unnotarized sworn statement which states that the applicant came under indirect fire.  However, the applicant initially stated that there was no supporting evidence submitted to the commander to substantiate this incident.  Therefore, he is not entitled to this award.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009916



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009912

    Original file (20080009912.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 May 2003, the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Noble Eagle, in MOS 11B. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS). However, the evidence of record shows that he was assigned or attached to a Military Police unit during his service in Iraq.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007030

    Original file (20080007030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) instead of the Combat Action Badge (CAB) and that he contributed to the MGIB. Upon confirmation from their chain that the enemy was setting up a mortar system for an indirect fire attack, he and the other two Soldiers fired an initial volley of three high-explosive (HE) rounds. Furthermore, the applicant evidence of record shows that the applicant held an infantry MOS and engaged the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017800

    Original file (20110017800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The evidence clearly shows the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018091

    Original file (20110018091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 November 2008 he was ordered to active duty as a field artillery CPT and he served until he was REFRAD on 23 November 2010. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. Based on the evidence submitted with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009913

    Original file (20080009913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). On 3 October 2007, he was released from active duty upon completion of his required active service and returned to his unit in the CAARNG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022171

    Original file (20120022171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section VIII (Awards and Decorations) of his Enlisted Record Brief, dated 19 May 2012, does not show the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. A Soldier must be personally present and under hostile...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011795

    Original file (20070011795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His regimental commander denied the request for award of the CIB and wrote on the DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) in the comments section the initials "CAB", the acronym for the Combat Action Badge. The applicant states the CAB is for non-infantry personnel; that he is an Infantryman; and that he was assigned to 3/278 Regimental Combat Team, Mortar Platoon. The evidence presented by the applicant shows that he was an Infantryman assigned to a mortar platoon that was part of a combined arms...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010541

    Original file (20130010541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reversal of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command's (HRC) decision denying him award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and a personal appearance before the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The evidence shows his dismounted unit received six mortar rounds 75-100 meters from their position. By all accounts, there is insufficient evidence the applicant and his unit actually engaged the enemy in combat fire.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009915

    Original file (20080009915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. Evidence of record shows the applicant was ordered to active duty in Support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016458

    Original file (20090016458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Evidence of record shows that USAHRC, Awards Branch, Alexandria, disapproved the applicant's request for award of the CIB because even though he submitted witness statements that his vehicle had been hit by an IED there was no evidence that his unit was engaged in active ground combat, to close with and destroy the enemy with direct fires. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...