Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009742
Original file (20080009742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        13 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080009742 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the period ending 10 December 1987 be corrected to show all campaign and expedition credit for the period he served in the military.

2.  The applicant states that he was stationed in Germany with the 549th Maintenance Company and his unit supported units that were deployed from the United States.  He further states that he is not able to seek employment from the U.S. Postal Service until his DD Form 214 is corrected.  In effect, he is trying to prove entitlements to a veterans' preference.

3.  The applicant provides a two page U.S. Postal Service "Campaigns and Expedition Which Qualify For Veteran's Preference."

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 October 1985.  He arrived in Germany with the 549th Maintenance Company, 6th Battalion, 3rd Air Defense Artillery on 12 January 1987.  He departed Germany on 8 December 1987.

3.  The applicant was discharged from active duty on 10 December 1987.

4.  There are no orders in the applicant's military records that show he was deployed during his military service.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in U.S. military operations, U.S. operations in direct support of the United Nations, and U.S. operations of assistance for friendly foreign nations.  Qualifying service for this award includes the requirements to be a bona fide member of a unit participating in or be engaged in direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive days in the area of eligibility or for 60 nonconsecutive days provided this support involved entering the operations' area of eligibility or met certain other criteria.  The designated military operations and dates of eligibility for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal are specified in Army Regulation 600-8-22.  

6.  This regulation shows that during the applicant's period of service the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was authorized for participation in Operations Eldorado Canyon-Libya during the period 12 April 1986 through 17 April 1986, Lebanon during the period 1 June 1983 through 1 December 1987, and Earnest Will-Persian Gulf during the period 24 July 1987 through 1 August 1990.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant did not identify what campaign and expedition credit he believes he is entitled to.  Therefore, it cannot be determined what campaign medals should be compared to his service.  However, most campaign medals require the individual Soldier to have deployed during the campaign, not just that the Soldier supported other Soldiers who deployed during the campaign.

2.  As regard to expedition credit, during the applicant's period of service the only authorized service award was the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.  This medal was authorized for units that were deployed to Libya, Lebanon, or the Persian Gulf or in direct support of the operations.  Evidence of record shows the applicant was assigned to the 549th Maintenance Company for the period January 1987 through December 1987.  However, there is no evidence that shows the applicant was deployed during his military service or that his unit was in direct support of the operation of any of the above operations.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show he is eligible for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009742



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009742



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01410

    Original file (BC-2003-01410.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the applicant did not provide any documentation to substantiate his claim, DPPPR recommends denying the applicant’s request for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 July 2003 for review and response (Exhibit D). There is no indication in his records that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000957

    Original file (20150000957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant's service in support of: a. c. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 28 July 1986 through 27 July 1989. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 28 July 1986 through 27 July 1989 (Standard Name Line: SPC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04102019C070208

    Original file (04102019C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her records be corrected to show entitlement to the Army of Occupation Medal for service in Berlin and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal even though she did not serve in the Persian Gulf area. The evidence confirms that the applicant is entitled to an award of the Army of Occupation Medal for service in Berlin prior to 2 October 1990. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060014860C071029

    Original file (AR20060014860C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the available records fail to show that the applicant ever served in Kosovo. The message states, in pertinent part, that these medals will be awarded to recognize members of the armed forces of the United States serving in or in support of Global War on Terrorism operations, on or after 11 September 2001, to a date to be determined. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000920

    Original file (20120000920.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following awards be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 3 February 2004: * Iraq Campaign Medal or Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal * Overseas Service Ribbon for his deployment * Global War on Terrorism Service Medal 2. d. The Global War on Terrorism Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have participated in Global War on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018515

    Original file (20080018515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for operations in Lebanon and Grenada. “Area of eligibility” is defined as the foreign territory on which troops have actually landed or are present and specifically deployed for the operation; adjacent water areas in which ships are operating, patrolling, or providing direct support of the operation; and the air space above and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059629C070421

    Original file (2001059629C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his support of military operations in Lebanon and Grenada. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: However, there is no evidence of record which shows that he was deployed to Lebanon and Grenada or that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016135

    Original file (20090016135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the GWOTSM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have participated in the Global War on Terrorism operations outside of the designated areas of eligibility, on or after 11 September 2001 to a future date to be determined. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that the GWOTEM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who deployed abroad for service in the Global War on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012384

    Original file (20060012384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012384 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Service with the MFO is not one of the designated operations eligible for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510507C070209

    Original file (9510507C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to reflect service in Southwest Asia and associated service medals. The evidence of record confirms the applicant serviced in Southwest Asia from September 1990 through April 1991 and as such is entitled to the Southwest Asia Service Medal with three bronze service stars, and the Kuwait Liberation Medals awarded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Government of Kuwait. That all of the Department of the Army records related to...