Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008682
Original file (20080008682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  26 August 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008682


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he served on active duty for a period of 90 days.

2.  The applicant states that he told the Army about his asthma when he was drafted but they took him anyway.  He was released 7 days short of 90 days and was denied Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Certification of Military Service (NA Form 13038).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 17 July 1969, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years.  He was subsequently assigned to Fort Polk, Louisiana, for his initial training.

3.  The applicant’s medical records were not available for review.

4.  Special Orders Number 245, paragraph 059, Fort Polk, Louisiana, dated 
7 October 1969, directed that the applicant be discharged due to medical reasons, effective 9 October 1969, and issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate.

5.  On 9 October 1969, the applicant was accordingly discharged.  He had completed 2 months and 23 days of creditable active duty (87 days). 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence clearly shows the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and subsequently discharged after 87 days of active duty service due to a medical condition.

2.  There is no evidence showing the applicant had served on active duty prior to 17 July 1969 or after 9 October 1969.  

3.  There are no regulatory provisions for increasing an individual’s active duty service in order to obtain VA benefits.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





__________ _ X   _______   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070016793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008682



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015693

    Original file (20110015693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does show his overseas duty. The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his overseas duty in Thailand was carefully considered and determined to have merit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214, Item 24c (Foreign Service) to show 6 months and 17 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012896

    Original file (20080012896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 14 November 1962 be corrected to show his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) during the period 1963 to 1964. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served on active duty for one year during the period 1963 to 1964.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075256C070403

    Original file (2002075256C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 July 1969, he departed his unit AWOL and was dropped from the rolls as a deserter on the same day. On 19 December 1975, the applicant was issued a Clemency Discharge pursuant to Presidential Proclamation Number 4313. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004954

    Original file (20130004954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT). The applicant departed Vietnam on 12 May 1969 and arrived at Fort Carson on 18 June 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014440

    Original file (20100014440.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the date he entered active duty as 19 December 1990 instead of 16 March 1997. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG) on 17 March 1989 and was ordered to active duty for training on 2 June 1989. Item 35 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) contains an entry that shows he was ordered to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028172

    Original file (20100028172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows in block 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) that his last duty assignment and major command was Company B, 5th Battalion, 60th Infantry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division. Accordingly, his DD Form 214 properly reflects that his last unit of assignment was Company B, 5th Battalion, 60th Infantry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division, and the applicant failed to show through the evidence submitted and the evidence of record that such was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019757

    Original file (20110019757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Accordingly, on 17 July 1969, he was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington where he was discharged that date under the provisions of Army regulation 635-212, for unfitness due to frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with military authorities and the issuance of an undesirable discharge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he applied to the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006098

    Original file (20110006098.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect the second digit of his social security number (SSN) as "5" instead of "6." The applicant states his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects the second digit of his SSN as "6" instead of "5." A review of his records shows that only two documents are contained in his official records (other than the DD Form 214) that contain the applicant's SSN, the DA Form 3027...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012944

    Original file (20100012944.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his correct Service Number and military occupational specialty (MOS). The evidence of record also shows that his Service Number is incorrectly recorded in item 2 of his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows that the primary MOS code number and title will be entered in item 23a of the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017374

    Original file (20080017374.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 7 February 1969 to 5 February 1971;...