Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006098
Original file (20110006098.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110006098 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect the second digit of his social security number (SSN) as "5" instead of "6."

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects the second digit of his SSN as "6" instead of "5."

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of a social security benefit application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States in Houston, Texas, on 13 December 1965.  At the time of his induction he completed a DA Form 3027 (Request for National Agency Check) and indicated the second digit of his SSN was "5."  He was issued an Army service number at the time of his induction.  He completed basic training at Fort Polk, Louisiana; advanced individual training as an indirect fire infantryman at Fort Gordon, Georgia; and airborne training at Fort Benning, Georgia; before being transferred to Vietnam on 3 July 1966.

3.  He departed Vietnam on 6 July 1967 for assignment to Fort Bragg, North Carolina, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 12 December 1967 due to the expiration of his term of service.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects the second digit of his SSN as "6."

4.  On 1 December 1971, orders were published by the U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel Administration Center honorably discharging the applicant from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) effective 12 December 1971.  These orders reflect "5" as the second digit of his SSN.

5.  A review of his records shows that only two documents are contained in his official records (other than the DD Form 214) that contain the applicant's SSN, the DA Form 3027 completed during induction and his discharge orders from the USAR.  Both documents reflect the second digit of his SSN as "5."

6.  On 1 July 1969, the Army discontinued the issuance and use of the Army service number and began using the SSN for identification.  Prior to 1 July 1969, service members were not required to maintain an SSN in their records; however, they were usually recorded when provided by the individual Soldier.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that information contained on the DD Form 214 will be taken from official records in effect on the date of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects "6" in the second digit of his SSN has been noted and appears to have merit.

2.  At the time the applicant was inducted, he declared his SSN as having "5" as the second digit.  However, at the time of his REFRAD, his DD Form 214 was incorrectly prepared to reflect his SSN as having "6" as the second digit.  This is further confirmed by the fact that he was discharged from the USAR and his discharge orders reflect "5" as the second digit of his SSN.

3.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect his SSN contains "5" as the second digit.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show the second digit of his SSN as "5" instead of "6" as currently reflected.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   X____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110006098



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110006098



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015159

    Original file (20110015159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect that the last digit of his social security number (SSN) is a "7." He had served 2 years of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that the last digit of his SSN is a "5." The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013204

    Original file (20110013204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect the second digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) as a “7” instead of an “8,” as currently reflected. The applicant states his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that his SSN contains an “8” as the second digit and should reflect a “7.” 3. The applicant served all of his military service using an SSN containing a “7” as the second digit and it appears...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018273

    Original file (20110018273.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) incorrectly reflects that the third digit of his SSN is a "3" instead of a "4." At the time of his induction he was issued an Army Service Number and he provided his SSN, which contained a "4" as the third digit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120024627

    Original file (20120024627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his correct Social Security Number (SSN), Date of Birth (DOB) and the date of his release from active duty (REFRAD). At the time of his induction, his SSN was recorded in his records as having the last four digits of “7820” and his DOB was recorded as 19 August. His records show the last four of his SSN as “7820” and were incorrectly reflected as “7280,”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022563

    Original file (20110022563.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 was incorrectly prepared to reflect the third digit of his SSN as “2” instead of “3.” 3. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110022563 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110022563 2 ARMY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002347

    Original file (20110002347.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the fifth digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) is a “0”; however, through a clerical error his DD Form 214 was incorrectly prepared to reflect a “9” in the fifth digit. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the fifth digit of his SSN as reflected in block 3 of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006375

    Original file (20120006375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the fourth and fifth digits of his social security number (SSN) as "88" instead of "55." The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the fourth and fifth digits of his SSN on his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021116

    Original file (20110021116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that a typographical error occurred when his DD Form 214 was prepared to reflect that the first digit of his SSN was a “2” instead of a “3.” 3. He had served 1 year, 7 months, and 3 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that the first digit of his SSN was a “2.” 4. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the SSN contained in block 3 (SSN)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018504

    Original file (20100018504.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his separation date as 14 July 1969 instead of 30 July 1967. On 22 January 1991, The Adjutant General issued the applicant a DD Form 215 correcting the SSN on his 30 July 1967 DD Form 214; however, there is no evidence that a correction was made to his DD Form 214 dated 14 July 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012309

    Original file (20110012309.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect that the fourth digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) is a “1” instead of a “2.” 2. At the time of his induction his records were prepared to reflect his SSN as containing a “1” in the fourth digit. On 7 October 1966, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) at Oakland Army Base, California and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD was...