Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075256C070403
Original file (2002075256C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 23 January 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002075256

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Carolyn G. Wade Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Chairperson
Ms. Gail J. Wire Member
Mr. Patrick H. McGann, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

APPLICANT STATES: That President Ford granted him a full pardon in 1974.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 May 1969 for a period of 2 years. On 26 May 1969, while in basic combat training (BCT) at Fort Polk, Louisiana, the applicant departed his unit absent without leave (AWOL). He remained AWOL until 9 June 1969.

On 17 July 1969, he departed his unit AWOL and was dropped from the rolls as a deserter on the same day. On 15 September 1970, he returned to duty at Fort Polk. He was assigned to the United States Army Special Processing Detachment, Fort Polk.

He was AWOL from 26 to 27 October 1970. On 31 October 1970, he again departed the unit AWOL and remained AWOL until 2 November 1970.

On 12 November 1970, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of 2 specifications for being AWOL. He was sentenced to a BCD, 3 months confinement at hard labor, and forfeiture of $25.00 pay per month for 3 months. The sentence was approved on 19 December 1970.

On 23 July 1971, the sentence, having been affirmed was ordered executed. The unexecuted portion of the sentence to confinement and forfeiture was remitted.

On 11 August 1971, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-204 with a BCD. He was credited with 1 year and 9 days of creditable military service and 445 days of lost time.

On 19 December 1975, the applicant was issued a Clemency Discharge pursuant to Presidential Proclamation Number 4313.

Army Regulation 635-204, then in effect, stated that an enlisted person would be discharged with a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial imposing a BCD.

Presidential Proclamation Number 4313 was issued by President Ford and affected three groups of individuals. These groups were: (1) Fugitives from


justice who were draft evaders; (2) Members of the Armed Forces who were in an unauthorized absence status; and, (3) Prior members of the Armed Forces who had been discharged with a punitive or undesirable discharge for violation of Articles 85, 86, or 87 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It provided an opportunity for deserters to work their way back into American society.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board considered the applicant's overall quality of service, the events that precipitated the discharge, and available evidence related to post-service activities and accomplishments. The Board determined that the presidential pardon and clemency discharge were not sufficient to upgrade the applicant's discharge. All things considered, the Board concluded that further clemency is not warranted.

2. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__kan___ __gjw___ __phm___ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002075256
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030123
TYPE OF DISCHARGE BCD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19710811
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-204
DISCHARGE REASON BCD
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 144.9405
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009092

    Original file (20100009092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Joint Alternate Service Board composed of military personnel would establish a period of alternate service of not more than 24 months that the individuals would perform. Both the Joint Board and Presidential Board were authorized to award a Clemency Discharge with the performance of alternate service. He was discharged pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial and was issued a bad conduct discharge after the sentence was affirmed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014827

    Original file (20130014827.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge to an honorable discharge. The complete facts and circumstances concerning the applicant's discharge proceedings are not in the available records; however, on 3 December 1970, the general court-martial convening authority approved the applicant's request for excess leave without pay pending execution of his bad conduct discharge. The applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded to an honorable discharge because he received a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009893

    Original file (20100009893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 January 1971, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 28 January 1971. Evidence of record shows he was awarded a clemency discharge in 1975 pursuant to PP 4313 of 16 September 1974.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027548

    Original file (20100027548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to a general discharge. On 27 July 1972, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of court-martial. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service - in lieu of a court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions and issuance of an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055046C070420

    Original file (2001055046C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 October 1975, he received a full pardon (grant of executive clemency) under Presidential Proclamation 4313. The Clemency Discharge is a neutral discharge, issued neither under “honorable conditions” nor under “other than honorable conditions.” A Clemency Discharge does not affect the underlying discharge and does not entitle the individual to any benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs (formerly Veterans Administration). The applicant’s voluntary request for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010858C070208

    Original file (20040010858C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his discharge. On 28 January 1980, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's petition to upgrade his discharge. Upon successful completion of the alternate service, former members would be granted a clemency discharge by the President of the United States, thus restoring his or her affected civil rights.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075305C070403

    Original file (2002075305C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon successful completion of the alternate service, former members would be granted a “clemency” discharge by the President of the United States, thus restoring his or her affected civil rights. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: After considering his overall record of service with regard to the Presidential Proclamation 4313 program, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077676C070215

    Original file (2002077676C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007631C070205

    Original file (20060007631C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged on 23 January 1970 under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate with service characterized as under other than honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010876

    Original file (20100010876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Undesirable Discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge. He was advised that, in order to participate in the program, he must agree to participate in the President’s Program; agree to reaffirm his allegiance to the United States; and pledge to perform alternate service for a period not to exceed 24 months (this portion of the program was administered by the Selective Service System and entailed performance of work in jobs that promoted the...