Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000360
Original file (20110000360.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR 20110000360
 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests adjustment of the date of rank (DOR) and effective date of her promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) to 4 January 2007.

2.  The applicant states she was on Medical Hold with the Community Based Health Care Organization (CBHCO) and Wounded Warrior Unit undergoing treatment for an injury that occurred while she was deployed.  She was in a LTC Inspector General position within the Division Staff.  She held that position without benefit of being promoted to LTC by the command.  She was unaware that she could have been promoted during her time on Medical Hold and found out during as Soldier Readiness Processing (SRP).  She requests back pay and the DOR be changed to reflect the original DOR approved by the Department of the Army Selection Board.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* Memorandum, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Subject:  Eligibility for Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer Not on Active Duty, dated 4 January 2007
* Orders A-12-630264, HRC, dated 12 December 2006
* Orders 164-1057, Texas Military Forces, Army National Guard, dated 
13 June 2007



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) on 12 May 1989.  She continued to serve and was promoted to major effective 4 December 1999.

2.  Orders A-01-700475, HRC, dated 8 January 2007, announce she was retained on active duty for the purpose of voluntarily participation in a Reserve component medical holdover medical retention processing status for completion of medical care and treatment.  She was assigned to the Medical Retention Center at Fort Hood, TX, and attached to the Arkansas CBHCO, Camp Robinson, AR.  The reporting date was 21 January 2007 for a period to end 4 June 2007.  The period was later extended to
27 May 2008, and on 17 June 2008, the unexecuted portion of the orders was rescinded effective 11 June 2008.

3.  In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of:

	a.  Memorandum, HRC, St Louis, MO, Subject:  Eligibility for Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer Not on Active Duty, dated 4 January 2007, which announces she was selected for promotion to LTC.  The effective date of the promotion is shown as 17 February 2007, or the date Federal recognition (FEDREC) is extended in the higher grade.

	b.  Orders A-12-630264, HRC, Alexandria, VA, dated 12 December 2006, announcing she was retained on active duty for the purpose of voluntarily participating in the reserve component medical holdover medical retention processing program for completion of medical care and treatment.  She was to be assigned to the Medical Retention Center, Fort Hood, TX, with report date of 
8 December 2006 for a period of 179 days to end 4 June 2007.

	c.  Texas Military Forces, Army National Guard, Orders 164-1057, dated 
13 June 2007, which announce that effective 15 May 2007, she was transferred to the Inspector General, Headquarters and Headquarters Company 36th Infantry Division, Austin, TX. 

4.  Special Orders Number 108 AR, Departments of the Army and Air Force National Guard Bureau, dated 30 April 2009, announce she was extended Federal recognition as a LTC effective 30 April 2009.

5.  In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Division, National Guard Bureau (NGB), Arlington, VA.  The advisory official recommends the Federal Recognition granted in Order Number 108 AR, dated 30 April 2009 be amended to show she was promoted with an effective date and DOR of 11 June 2008, and that she receive all back pay and allowances as a result of that action.  

	a.  The advisory official noted that the 4 January 2007 HRC memorandum indicates the applicant was selected for promotion and eligible with an effective date of 17 February 2007, or the date FEDREC is extended in the higher grade.

 	b.  The advisory official also noted that National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-100, [Commissioned Officers, Federal Recognition, and Related Personnel Actions] paragraph 8-2(b) states, “except as provided in this chapter, promotion will be accomplished only when an appropriate MTOE or TDA position vacancy in the grade exists in the unit.”  An email from TXARNG, dated 14 May 2011, states the applicant was placed in an 0-5 slot on 15 May 2007.  This is supported by TXARNG Order number 164-1057, dated
13 June 2007. 

	c.  The advisory official further points out that NGR 600-100, paragraph 
8-15(a)(3) states in part, “an ARNG commissioned officer, not on active duty, who is selected for promotion as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army resulting from mandatory consideration may be extended Federal recognition in the higher grade, subject to the following conditions…the officer is medically qualified IAW AR 40-501 [Standards of Medical Fitness] and meets the height and weight standards IAW [in accordance with] AR 600-9 [The Army Weight Control Program].”  Human Resources Command (HRC) – Alexandria Order Number A-01-700475, dated 8 January 2007, places the applicant on Medical Retention.  HRC-St Louis Order Number A-01-70047R, dated 17 June 2008, rescinds the unexecuted portion of the order placing her on Medical Retention effective 11 June 2008.

	d.  The applicant has met all other criteria for promotion to LTC, having already been selected for promotion and placed in an 05 slot, the earliest she could be promoted is 11 June 2008..

6.  On 14 September 2011, the applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for information in order to allow her the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  She has not responded.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends her DOR and effective date of promotion to LTC should be adjusted to 4 January 2007.  She was unaware she could have been promoted while she was on Medical Hold.
2.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC with an effective date and DOR of 17 February 2007 or the date Federal recognition is extended in the higher grade.

3.  However, she was ordered to be retained on active duty with a reporting date of 8 December 2006.  The purpose was to voluntarily participate in the reserve component medical holdover medical retention processing program for completion of medical care and treatment.  Therefore, she was not medically qualified for promotion until the unexecuted portion of these orders was rescinded effective 11 June 2008. 

4.  The applicant has met all other criteria for promotion to LTC, having already been selected for promotion and placed in an O-5 slot, the earliest she could be promoted is 11 June 2008, which is the date the rescission of her medical hold status was effective.

5.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records should be corrected as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: 

   a.  correcting the applicant's State ARNG orders by showing she was promoted to lieutenant colonel, effective 11 June 2008;

   b.  voiding the applicant's Federal Recognition and orders promoting her to lieutenant colonel, effective 30 April 2009, and declare them to be of no force or effect; and 
   
   c.  showing that the applicant was extended Federal Recognition in the ARNG and promoted to lieutenant colonel/pay grade O-5, with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 11 June 2008, with payment of all back pay and allowances due as a result of this adjustment.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adjusting her DOR and effective date of promotion to LTC to 4 January 2007.



      ___________X__________
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090008207



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                        AR20110000360



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017700

    Original file (20080017700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of an earlier Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) letter, dated 4 September 2008, in support of his request. On 3 May 2007, in response to the applicant’s petition, dated 21 August 2006, to the ABCMR to adjust his DOR to MAJ from 16 August 2006 to 24 September 2003, the ABCMR rendered a favorable decision and recommended the applicant’s records be corrected by amending Federal Recognition Special Orders Number 209 AR, dated 16 August 2006, to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004797

    Original file (20080004797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 July 2004, the applicant requested his previous application to the ABCMR, dated 31 March 2003, be further amended to show he requested a military education waiver for consideration for promotion to MAJ under the SSB. It also states that an officer who is promoted to the next higher grade as a result of the recommendation of a special selection board convened under this section, shall, upon such promotion, have the same date of rank and effective date for pay and allowances of that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010295

    Original file (20140010295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An advisory opinion was received from the National Guard Bureau (NGB) on 9 June 2014 in the processing of this case. Following timelines of events were: * on 21 January 2001, the applicant was honorably separated from the Army on a DD Form 214 * From 22 January 2001 through 31 May 2002, the applicant's ARNG Current Annual Statement indicated he was in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) * on 1 June 2002, he was appointed as a 1LT in the ILARNG on NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office) and DA Order...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013483

    Original file (20110013483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The State of Texas was over strength on AGR O-5 positions and the State did not get their control grade O-5 positions corrected until late 2010. In her response to the NGB advisory opinion, she suggested the Board request information from the Texas AGR services pertaining to AGR MAJs and LTCs promotions; however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decides cases on the evidence of record. The evidence shows that she was eligible for promotion to LTC on 4 October 2008;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013721

    Original file (20090013721.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Also on the same date, by letter, HRC-St. Louis notified him that he was promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army to LTC with an effective date of 11 January 2005 and a DOR of 15 April 2004. e. In the applicant's application, he submitted a letter from MG (Retired) V-----, who served as TAG of the State of Massachusetts at the time the applicant was appointed to MAJ in the MAARNG, dated 1 March 2010. Army Regulation 135-155 provides policy for the selection and promotion of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006185

    Original file (20090006185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090006185 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The NGB memorandum, dated 1 September 2004, concerning the promotion of mobilized ARNG officers applies only to those officers recommended for promotion to the grades of captain through lieutenant colonel. Notwithstanding the opinion provided by the NGB, there are no provisions to change the applicant's DOR for promotion to colonel to an earlier date because she was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017515

    Original file (20120017515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment to her date of rank (DOR) for major (MAJ) from 21 July 2010 to 25 June 2007. The applicant states she was appointed in 2007 and went before an Army Special Selection Board and she was promoted to CPT with a DOR of 26 November 2008. Therefore, her military service records correctly show her DOR of 30 July 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014220

    Original file (20080014220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her promotion packet was submitted to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) on 19 May 2008; however, she was informed that her promotion packet had not been submitted until July 2008, and this resulted in her promotion date to MAJ being established as 5 August 2008. A Federal Recognition Order Processing Report, dated 2 December 2008, shows that promotion packets submitted by the applicant that were received on 2 and 19 June 2008 were incomplete and as a result were returned without action. When...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015690

    Original file (20100015690.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the following: * Her request should be granted based on abuse of authority * In February 2003, she applied for officer candidate school (OCS), was boarded, and was selected for accelerated State OCS * She was placed as number 1 on the order of merit list (OML) for OCS attendance * She was improperly removed from the OML by colonel (COL) S****, her superior officer at the time 3. On 10 January 2007, the TXARNG published Orders 010-1008 promoting her to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023391

    Original file (20100023391.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Also on 11 March 2010, HRC-STL issued the applicant his promotion to LTC memorandum with an effective date of 11 March 2010. Therefore, the officer may have a maximum time in grade date that is before the approval date of the promotion advisory board/special selection board that recommended him or her for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard records and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Federal...