Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007076
Original file (20080007076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	      4 November 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080007076 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that block 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be changed to D Company, 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division.

2.  The applicant states that the only time he spent with the 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment was during training or while on leave.  He would like to have the unit he served with in combat, the 7th Cavalry Regiment, listed on his DD Form 214 so that it can be placed on his tombstone when he dies.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973.  Information herein was obtained from reconstructed personnel records, consisting of the DD Form 214 and Headquarters, Camp Carson, Colorado, Special Orders Number 115, dated 31 May 1952.

3.  Headquarters, Camp Carson, Colorado, Special Orders Number 115, dated 31 May 1952, show that the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  He is shown to have been assigned to the 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment.

4.  The DD Form 214 provides the following information:

	a.  this form covers the period from 7 January 1949 through 2 June 1952;

	b.  the applicant served on active duty for a total of 4 years, 10 months, and 14 days; 

	c.  he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, the Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp, the Korean Service Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge;

	d.  his most significant duty assignment (block 28) is listed as Company B, 1st Battalion, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, Camp Carson, Colorado.

5.  Special Regulation 135-175-5 (Civilian Components – Separation of Officers), dated 19 December 1949, prescribed the policies and procedures for completing the DA Form 214 for officer personnel.  In pertinent part, it stated the entry representing the duty which required the greatest demonstration of the officer's training and experience would be entered in item 28.

6.  Special Regulation 615-360-1 (Enlisted Personnel -- Discharge Procedures and Preparation of Separation Forms), dated 20 June 1950, prescribed the policies and procedures for completing the DA Form 214 for enlisted personnel.  In pertinent part, it stated that the last unit, or similar element, to which assigned for duty would be entered in item 28.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Based on the applicant's awards, the conclusion that his assignment at Camp Carson as being his most significant duty assignment is questionable; however; it was his last duty station.  

2.  Although item 28 is entitled "Most Significant Duty Assignment," this item was used for both officers and enlisted personnel, and officers and enlisted personnel had different criteria for determining what information would be entered in this item on the DD Form 214.  The instructions for officers were to enter the duty which required the greatest demonstration of the officer's training and experience, i.e., the most significant duty assignment.  The instructions for enlisted were to enter the last unit, or similar element, to which assigned for duty.  The correct entry appears to have been entered on the applicant's DD Form 214.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X  ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007076



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007076



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000491C070208

    Original file (20040000491C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states this is incorrect; he was fighting in Korea in March 1952. c. Paragraphs 11 and 17 state that he was assigned to Company F, 5th Infantry Regiment, 71st Infantry Division. The applicant states there was no 71st Infantry Division in Korea during the war. b. Inserting the words "(Regimental Combat Team)" in Block 28 of the individual's DD Form 214 after the expression "REGT," and c. By correcting ABCMR Proceedings Docket Number AR2003091490 as stated in paragraph 10 of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014060

    Original file (20140014060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Medals), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021550

    Original file (20120021550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he does not understand why the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) denied award of the "Army of Occupation Medal (Japan)." His DD Form 214 shows in: * Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) - Korean Service Medal with 1 silver service star and 2 bronze service stars and United Nations Service Medal * Item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) - Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 7th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009439

    Original file (20080009439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 10 (Date of Birth) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show he was born in January not June; that item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) be corrected to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM), and four awards of the Purple Heart...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020641

    Original file (20100020641.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to reflect: * he was discharged in the rank of sergeant first class (SFC) (promoted on 23 July 1953) * he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) * he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * he was awarded the Korean Service Medal (KSM) with two bronze service stars * he was awarded the Combat Infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021241

    Original file (20130021241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his last unit of assignment as Company B, 5th Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows his last duty assignment and major command as: Company B, 2nd Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division in the United States...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012522

    Original file (20080012522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in the Republic of Vietnam on 24 July 1967; and b. showing that, in addition to the awards shown on his DD Form 214, his authorized awards include the Purple Heart, two bronze service stars to be affixed to his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal, Republic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016076

    Original file (20100016076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214, effective 28 February 1972, shows in Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command): HHT 1/10 Cavalry, Sixth U.S. Army. The available evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was assigned to the 12th Cavalry Regiment while in the Republic of Vietnam. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008259

    Original file (20120008259.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his identification (ID) card to show the permanent rank of sergeant (SGT) and his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation Armed Forces of the United States) to show in: * Item 3 (Grade-Rate-Rank) the permanent rank of SGT * Item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) the entry Company G, 7th Cavalry Regiment 2. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade held at the time of separation. There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001914

    Original file (20090001914.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 February 1953, the 5th Cavalry Regiment, 61st Field Artillery Battalion, and Battery "A," 29th AAA AW Battalion, departed from Otaru, Japan for Pusan and Koje-do, Korea to relieve the 7th Cavalry. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows his most significant assignment was with the 7th Cavalry Regiment. If the 7th Cavalry returned to Japan by 20 February 1953, it is very likely that the applicant completed most if not all of his foreign service in Japan rather than Korea and, therefore,...