Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014060
Original file (20140014060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  31 March 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140014060 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he would like to be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) and a letter from the Veteran Services Office of Anoka County, Minnesota, dated 1 August 2014.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed his records were destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents available to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty in Fargo, North Dakota on 20 November 1950.  He held military occupational specialty 4745 (Infantryman) and attained the rank of private first class.  His most significant duty assignment was listed as Company D, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, Camp Carson, Colorado.  His DD Form 214 also shows:

	a.  He was awarded the Korean Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the United Nations Service Medal.

	b.  He was honorably released from active duty at Camp Carson, Colorado on 29 August 1952.  He completed 1 year and 9 months of net active service, of which 11 months and 7 days was listed as foreign service, most likely in Korea.

4.  Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Medals), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 
27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  

	a.  A Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings, including those pertinent to attendance at service schools, must have all been recorded as "excellent" or higher, except that ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration, and service school efficiency (emphasis in the original) ratings of less than "excellent" entered prior to 3 March 1946, would not be disqualifying.  

	b.  There must have been no convictions by court-martial; however, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The regulation in effect during the time of the applicant's service stated that service members were not entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal until their immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

2.  The applicant's military record consists solely of his DD Form 214.  Despite his honorable separation, there is no way of knowing whether or not his commander recommended him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, or whether the preponderance of evidence would suggest he met the criteria for this award at the time of his release from active duty and had his commander's favorable endorsement for such an award.

3.  Unfortunately, there is insufficient evidence to grant the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014060





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014060



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015432

    Original file (20130015432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 27 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he earned the following awards: * Korean Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars * United Nations Service Medal 6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 8 January 1951 through 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007880

    Original file (20110007880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and the Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM). The applicant states that he was not awarded the AGCM or the ROKWSM and he desires to have them awarded at this time and to have his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) corrected accordingly. Army Regulation 600-65, in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007076

    Original file (20080007076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that block 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be changed to D Company, 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division. Based on the applicant's awards, the conclusion that his assignment at Camp Carson as being his most significant duty assignment is questionable; however; it was his last duty station. Although item 28 is entitled "Most Significant Duty Assignment,"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010781

    Original file (20120010781.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also, his conduct and efficiency ratings during his active duty service and his unit of assignment and period of service while in Korea cannot be verified due to the unavailability of his complete military records, especially his DA Form 24 (Service Record). As a result, there is insufficient evidence on which to base awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal. In reference to the Presidential Unit Citation, based on the fact that his unit of assignment and period of service during the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020641

    Original file (20100020641.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to reflect: * he was discharged in the rank of sergeant first class (SFC) (promoted on 23 July 1953) * he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) * he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * he was awarded the Korean Service Medal (KSM) with two bronze service stars * he was awarded the Combat Infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018109

    Original file (20100018109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was discharged in pay grade E-6; he was awarded the Korean Service Medal (KSM) with three bronze service stars, the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the American Defense Service Medal (ADSM), the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (ROKPUC), the Army of Occupation Medal (AOM); and that he be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020827

    Original file (20090020827.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded the Korean Service Medal with five bronze service stars to denote his participation in five campaigns in Korea and the United Nations Service Medal. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he was assigned to a unit that was awarded occupation credit for Japan, there appears to be no basis to award him the AOM at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013592

    Original file (20130013592.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains: a.. General Orders 297, 1st Cavalry Division, dated 24 January 1967, showing he was awarded the Air Medal for the period January to December 1966. b. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011924

    Original file (20100011924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012790

    Original file (20080012790.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The effective date for award of the CIB was 9 February 1945. On 3 December 1948, the War Department awarded the applicant the Bronze Star Medal based on his award of the CIB. The applicant was awarded the CIB, the BSM and the Good Conduct Medal for his service during WWII.