Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007031
Original file (20080007031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  3 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080007031 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) and Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) be corrected to show her actual scores on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) taken on 1 December 1998. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the MEPS entered an incorrect ASVAB score in her record.  She contends she took the ASVAB for the last time on
1 December 1998. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her ERB and copies of her ASVAB scoring sheets.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served in the Regular Army from 6 June 1999 through 17 July 2004.  She was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 91E (Dental Specialist).  She attained the grade of sergeant/E-5.  She was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) by reason of disability, severance pay.  She received $23,893.20 in severance pay.  

3.  The applicant did not indicate which ASVAB score she believed was entered incorrectly on her ERB and DA Form 2-1.  A comparison of the applicant's reported ASVAB scores, her ERB, and DA Form 2-1 shows that the scores were entered correctly.  The reported date of her ASVAB is 1 November 1998.  She also submitted an ASVAB report showing she also tested in some areas on
10 October 1998.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that her DA Form 2-1 and ERB be corrected to show the correct ASVAB scores from 1 December 1998.  No discernible error was found in her ASVAB scores reported in her record and the record shows she took the ASVAB on 1 November 1998 and earlier on 15 October 1998.  She failed to identify which ASVAB score she believes was reported incorrectly.

2.  Correction of military records is limited to documents that can be individually reviewed after a Soldier's separation.  Since the DA Form 2-1and ERB are not normally accessible by individuals other than the Soldier, there is no basis for corrective action.  Further, no error was found in the applicant's reported ASVAB scores. 

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit any evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__xxx___  __xxx___  __xxx___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


							XXX
	_______________________
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007031



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007031



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005254

    Original file (20130005254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show her revised Army Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) test scores. The recruiter did say that he can accept a copy of her DA Form 2-1 or ERB showing her updated scores. She believes that it could already be updated on her DA Form 2-1 or ERB in her official military record and if so she would like a copy of it to present to recruiters and have the Board update the information in the appropriate systems so that she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001173

    Original file (20140001173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides copies of a DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), a PQR, an Annex E to DD Form 4 (Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) Addendum, ARNG of the United States), a DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), and an ERB. The NGB denied her an ETP to retain the bonus because her contract/bonus addendum was obsolete, was signed before the enlistment documents, and the BCN was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001492

    Original file (20140001492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She would be rated on her performance of as many of the duties as were applicable. Overall, the contested NCOER was not in accordance with Army Regulation 623-3 (Evaluation Reporting System) so she is requesting it be removed from her OMPF. Although she provides evidence that indicates possible irregularities in the published rating scheme for her senior rater, there is no evidence and she has not provided conclusive evidence that shows she was not properly informed as to her rating chain...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004484

    Original file (20080004484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show completion of the Warrior Leader Course and Unit Supply Training. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed the 4-week Warrior Leader Course in 2007 and the one-week Unit Supply Training in 2007, which are not shown on her records; therefore she is entitled to correction of her records to show these courses. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001193

    Original file (20120001193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically discharged with an honorable discharge. The evidence of record shows an EPSBD was convened within the applicant's first 6 months of active service and found the applicant's condition (chronic back pain) medically disqualifying under procurement medical fitness standards. The evidence of record also shows that prior to the applicant completing 180 days of active service the separation authority directed the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010578

    Original file (20080010578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests her date of rank (DOR) for promotion to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 be corrected from 23 September 2005 to 26 August 2004 (the date she completed the Electronic Warfare/Signal Intelligence Course) or 7 September 2004 (the date she arrived at her first duty station). In a self-authored statement, dated 7 June 2008, the applicant states that: a. she enlisted under the ACASP program, formerly known as the stripes for skills program, which qualifies non-prior service-members with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2005-00165

    Original file (BC-2005-00165.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. She believes she has provided the Board sufficient documentation to show she is physically better now than at the time of her discharge. However, while it appears that she is currently not exhibiting signs of chronic back pain, the Board agrees with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the applicant was properly evaluated while on active duty and that duties within the Air Force are filled on a need rather...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03755

    Original file (BC-2006-03755.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 19 Aug 03 for a period of six years. On 27 Aug 05, applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of “Unsatisfactory Performance,” and was issued an RE code of 2C. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00351

    Original file (BC-2012-00351.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The four test failures were evidence of her lack of motivation. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While it is true she was counseled multiple times for her failures, she would like to make it clear that her academic deficiencies are not because of her lack of motivation. She failed this course, but it does not mean she would fail out of every course of study in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013843

    Original file (20110013843.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 April 2010, the applicant was issued an administrative Memorandum of Reprimand (MOR) from her battalion commander for dereliction of her duties between 24 July 2009 and 13 January 2010. As a result of her Article 15 hearing she was found guilty of failing to submit a report to her battalion commander on or about 14 December 2009. She disputes this finding based upon the facts that: (1) the Army Regulation 15-6 investigation indicated she had been a Human Resources Clerk for over 9...