Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006816
Original file (20080006816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       13 August 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006816 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests payment of the $240.00 remainder of the enlistment bonus due to his great-grandfather, a deceased former service member (FSM) in the Civil War.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his great-grandfather enlisted for a bounty, but was killed after only $60.00 of the bounty had been paid.  

3.  The applicant provides copies of the following:

	a.  historical documents and a family genealogy work sheet to demonstrate that he is a descendent of the FSM and, therefore, a qualified applicant;

	b.  records of the FSM's service;

   c.  historical documents concerning pensions for the FSM's family; and 

	c.  recent correspondence about the case.      

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  All documents considered were submitted by the applicant.  The FSM's service records are copies obtained from the National Archives, Washington, DC. 

3.  The FSM enlisted in I Company, 21st Missouri Infantry on 21 December 1863. A "Muster and Descriptive Roll," dated 29 December 1863, states that he was paid $62.00 bounty and that $240.00 was due.  Other entries show that, on 
30 January 1864, he died on a boat of wounds received on 24 January 1864.   

4.  Historical documents show that:

	a.  A pension had been granted the FSM's widow on 5 January 1865 and that she sought an increase in that pension for herself and five named minor children. Retroactive increases to $8.00 per month for the widow and $2.00 per month for each minor child was granted on 22 April 1867.

	b.  On 26 January 1872 the guardian of the FSM's five minor children went to court to appoint an attorney to procure the appropriate pension for those children.      
5.  A 23 February 1999 letter from the National Archives, Washington, DC to the applicant informed him that there was no "final payment voucher" for the FSM.  The applicant's application to the Board is dated 8 April 2008. 

6. Title 31, U.S. Code, § 3702 provides a 6-year statute of limitations on claims against the Government and the Comptroller General has held that an action by a Corrections Board is insufficient to authorize payment beyond the period of limitations. 

7.  Laches is the legal doctrine that a legal right or claim will not be enforced or allowed if a long delay in asserting the right or claim has prejudiced the adverse party. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Considering that the FSM's survivors were well enough informed and/or represented to claim survivors pensions, it is reasonable to presume that a claim was also made for any payable benefit resulting from the enlistment bonus. 

2.   The applicant knew of this situation in February 1999, 9 years before his application to the Board.  Furthermore, there is no evidence of any previous claim that was unpaid because of some error or omission by a responsible official.  Therefore, there is no action this Board could take that would authorize payment despite the 6-year limitation on claims established by Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702.  The Board cannot simply extend that limitation.

3.  Additionally, the legal doctrine of laches bars recovery in this case.

4.   In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

 BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X ___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006816





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006816



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016313

    Original file (20080016313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 December 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080016313 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080006816 on 13 August 2008. The applicant contended that his great-grandmother should have received a payment of the $240.00 remainder of the FSM's enlistment bounty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022536

    Original file (20120022536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant has provided evidence that shows the FSM was buried on 13 January 1864 in a cemetery in Brooklyn, NY. As a result, the Board recommends that an appropriate document should be produced to correct the FSM's duty status to show he was a loss to Company C, 63rd Regiment, NY Infantry, on 17 January 1864 due to his death while on leave in Brooklyn, NY.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003663

    Original file (20070003663.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    From service records, little more is known of the FSM's Civil War records. In 1880, the Surgeon General of The Army, in a report to the War Department Commissioner of Pensions, stated there was no military record of the FSM having been wounded at Antietam on 17 September 1862. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. publishing the appropriate authorization indicating the FSM was awarded the Civil War Campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013534C070206

    Original file (20050013534C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her great-great grandfather's records, a deceased former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was honorably discharged. The widow's request was rejected on 28 April 1903 because the FSM was discharged for desertion and was not honorably separated from his last period of service. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence, to show the FSM's discharge was unjust or in error.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000704

    Original file (20140000704.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides four pages that indicate the Purple Heart was issued to three Soldiers wounded during the Civil War. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. With respect to the Purple Heart, the Purple Heart was not awarded during the Civil War.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018701

    Original file (20110018701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 December 1903, the FSM was dropped from the rolls of invalid pensioners upon the basis that evidence was accepted as legally and conclusively showing that he enlisted on 28 August 1862, in Company K, 1st New York Marine Artillery, deserted, and without having been discharged, enlisted in Company D, 15th New York Engineers. On 11 July 1905, the Military Secretary, War Department stated the FSM’s application for removal of the charge of desertion from his record and for an honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005691

    Original file (20110005691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the record of his deceased great-grandfather, a former service member (FSM), to show he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH). He provides: * the FSM's death certificate and obituary * his Department of Defense/Uniformed Service Identification and Privilege Card * his birth certificate * a family tree * Soldier data and a list of battles involving the 30th Ohio Infantry Regiment from The American Civil War Research Database * pages from websites regarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006531C070208

    Original file (20040006531C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the records of his great-great uncle, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was not a deserter. The First West Virginia Infantry history provided by the applicant shows the FSM was listed as deserting at Lynchburg, VA on 18 June 1864. The only evidence of record available shows the FSM was listed as deserting on 18 June 1864.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022984

    Original file (20120022984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This research confirmed that DFAS did not receive an annuity application from her mother or a written claim for the annuity within 6 years of the FSM's death. As such, and only as a matter of equity, the FSM's records should be corrected to show his widow, the applicant's deceased mother, made a timely request for payment of the SBP annuity based on the FSM's death and her request was received and processed by DFAS shortly after the FSM's death. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005093

    Original file (20110005093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show his unit commander timely initiated procedures for him to receive payment of his enlistment bonus for enlisting in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for 6 years in 1993. The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 8 January 1993 for a period of 6 years. ________X_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...