Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005093
Original file (20110005093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	    27 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110005093 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show his unit commander timely initiated procedures for him to receive payment of his enlistment bonus for enlisting in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for 6 years in 1993.

2.  The applicant states he was to receive an enlistment bonus when he finished his advanced individual training (AIT).  He was recently looking through his old records and he realized he did not receive his bonus.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a DA Form 5261-R (Selected Reserve Incentive Program - Enlistment Bonus Addendum)
* his orders to initial active duty for training and AIT
* his request to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) for copies of his Leave and Earning Statements (LES)
* a letter from DFAS, dated 7 March 2011

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 

or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 8 January 1993 for a period of 6 years. His DA Form 5261-R shows:

* he was enlisting in the USAR with concurrent assignment to a unit of the Selected Reserve for a minimum of 6 years
* the unit identified for bonus entitlement was the 2053rd U.S. Army Reception Battalion
* he was entitled to an enlistment bonus of $1,500.00 for enlisting in a critical unit
* he would receive 1/2 payment of the bonus amount after receiving his high school diploma, completing initial active duty for training, and qualifying in a military occupational specialty (MOS)
* he would receive two subsequent payments of 1/4 of the bonus amount upon satisfactory completion of the second and fourth year of his enlistment term of service
* the procedures for payment of the enlistment bonus would be initiated by his unit commander

3.  He was ordered to report to initial active duty for training on 19 May 1993 and for AIT on 23 July 1993.  His training period was for approximately 15 weeks or completion of basic and MOS training.

4.  On 9 January 2001, he was discharged from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

5.  He requested copies of his LES's from DFAS for the period 7 January 1993 to 6 January 2001.  DFAS provided him copies of the requested LES's; however, his LES's for the following periods were not available:

* January through March 1993
* January through September 1994
* 
March 1998
* March 2000
* January 2001

6.  Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702, also known as the barring statute, prohibits the payment of a claim against the Government unless the claim has been received by the Comptroller General within 6 years after the claim accrues.  Among the important public policy considerations behind statutes of limitations, including the 6-year limitation for filing claims contained in this section, is relieving the Government of the need to retain, access, and review old records for the purpose of settling stale claims, which are often difficult to prove or disprove.

7.  The "Doctrine of laches" is based upon the maxim that equity aids the vigilant and not those who slumber on their rights.  The doctrine of laches is defined by Black’s Law Dictionary, sixth edition, as the neglect to assert a right or claim which, taken together with lapse of time and other circumstances causing prejudice to the adverse party, operates as a bar in a court of equity.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is insufficient evidence and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show when he completed his AIT.  Without this information it is unknown when he completed the requirements for his first payment of his enlistment bonus.

2.  He was required to remain assigned to the 2053rd U.S. Army Reception Battalion in the Selected Reserve for a minimum of 6 years.  He was discharged from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) on 9 January 2001.  There is no evidence showing when he was transferred from the 2053rd USA Reception Battalion in the Selective Reserve.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show he met the 6-year minimum requirement for his two subsequent payments of the enlistment bonus.

3.  More than 18 years have elapsed in his case.  An arbitrary ruling in his favor, without knowing the exact circumstances of what happened at the time and what his complete finance records would have shown, would cause prejudice to the Government.  Had he applied to the ABCMR within the limits of the barring statute an equitable decision could possibly have been made in his case.  However, since it is now more than 18 years after his separation, the doctrine of laches is invoked in his case.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X__  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________X_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005093



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005093



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013562

    Original file (20100013562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It does not show any evidence of an enlistment bonus. The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), item 35 (Record of Assignments), in pertinent part, shows he was assigned to the 1st Psychological Operations Company (Tactical), San Diego, California, on 19 November 1994, and he served in duty MOS 52D1O as a Power Generation Equipment Repairer. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted for 8 years in the USAR and agreed to serve his initial 6 years in a bonus...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002338

    Original file (20130002338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She provided a copy of Annex A of her enlistment contract, dated 9 February 1993, which shows she acknowledged she agreed to the following: * serve 6 years as an assigned member of a troop program unit and 2 years in the Individual Ready Reserve * training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 91M (Hospital Food Service Specialist) * a $10,000.00 SLRP entitlement 4. In addition, Line 7 of Table 9-4 requires the guidance counselor to verify that the applicant has qualifying loans if...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013223

    Original file (20110013223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 8 December 2006 in the grade of specialist/E-4 for a period of 8 years. The USARC, Deputy Chief of Staff, also stated that the applicant was authorized to retain the $10,000 OAB and was also authorized payment of any earned portions of the $4,000 High Grad Bonus and the $5,000 NPSEB Ship Bonus. A request for exception to policy from the USARC, G-1, approved the applicant to retain the $10,000 OAB and payment of any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029857

    Original file (20100029857.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY * DA Form 5261-2-R (Selected Reserve Incentive Program – Reenlistment/Extension Bonus Addendum) * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), dated 26 June 2001 * DA Form 3540 (Certificate and Acknowledgement of U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment) * DA Form 5261-4-R (SLRP Addendum) * DA Form 5435-R (Statement of Understanding – The Selected Reserve Montgomery GI Bill) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008895

    Original file (20140008895.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official states the applicant reenlisted on 21 November 2001 for 6 years and for MOS 91B with no incentive option. The evidence of record shows the applicant reenlisted in the USAR on 21 November 2001 for 6 years in MOS 91B. In light of the available evidence and the advisory official's favorable recommendation, it would be appropriate to correct his record to show he reenlisted for an RB on 21 November 2001 and to pay him the $5,000.00 RB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016339

    Original file (20140016339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He argues that he did not discover the error until 1987 when he discussed the allotments with his father and was told that none of them had ever been received. He acknowledges that his father received a letter, dated 21 October 1988, from the U.S. Army Finance and Accounting Center (USAFAC) stating it had been determined that none of the checks had been cashed and had been replaced. The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to show entitlement to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006322

    Original file (20080006322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records show that she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 23 January 2003 for a period of 8 years. Section III (Acknowledgement) of the applicant’s DA Form 5261-R (Selected Reserve Incentive Program-Enlistment Bonus Addendum) shows that in connection with her enlistment in the USAR, she elected “assignment to a unit (high priority) authorized by Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) for a bonus entitlement in a military occupational specialty (MOS) that is also...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061865C070421

    Original file (2001061865C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded a $5,000 enlistment bonus in connection with his enlistment in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 November 1999 and that he be authorized $20,000 for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) instead of $10,000. Records show that the applicant completed a DA Form 5261-5-R (Selected Reserve Incentive Program-USAR Prior Service Enlistment Bonus Addendum) at the time of his enlistment. On the date of his discharge, his entitlement to the SLRP was terminated.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002675

    Original file (20120002675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon his return from AIT, he was told that his unit had been reassigned to Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio, TX, which was almost 200 miles away. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. It also shows he agreed to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012393

    Original file (20110012393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. In an undated letter, she states: * she has been trying to receive her Reserve pay for years * she is 100 percent (%) disabled because of mental disabilities * there is no statute of limitations on mentally challenged individuals * someone took her Reserve checks * she didn't get out of the USAR until 2 February 1990 * she never received a Reserve check for weekend duty * someone is lying * she got out as an E-5 * she never had a break in...