Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006770
Original file (20080006770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  15 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006770 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Purple Heart be added to his separation document (DD Form 214).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he received the medal and signed a paper, but he never noticed that his Purple Heart was not on his DD Form 214.  The applicant adds that when he signed up for benefits at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital, they told him that he had no Purple Heart and without it he could not be placed in treatment category 3.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, dated 1 May 1969 and 1 February 1971, in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 June 1968, completed Officer Candidate School, and was honorably discharged on 1 May 1969 in order to accept a commission as an officer in the Army.

3.  The applicant was awarded the area of concentration of field artillery operations and intelligence assistant, served in Vietnam from 11 October 1969 to 21 October 1970, and was promoted to 1st lieutenant.

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 1 February 1971.

5.  The applicant’s military records are remarkably complete.  However, there is no evidence in the applicant’s records that show he was wounded or was awarded the Purple Heart.

6.  The applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. 

7.  There are no general orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

8.  During the processing of this case, a member for the Board staff reviewed the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human 
Resources Command (HRC), which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973.  This review failed to reveal any Purple Heart orders on file for the applicant.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests the Purple Heart but did not provide any evidence that he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

2.  Without documentation to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action, the regulatory criteria for award of the Purple Heart, there is insufficient evidence in which to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006770



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006770



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003593

    Original file (20090003593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in the Republic of Vietnam on 6 June 1969 and was accordingly awarded his first award of the Purple Heart. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant suffered a second wound/injury in the Republic of Vietnam on 29 September 1971 and was awarded his second award of the Purple Heart. In the absence of documentation that shows he suffered a third wound/injury as a result of hostile action and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017607

    Original file (20110017607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The Purple Heart requires: * a wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by military medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records * official orders awarding the decoration 4. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012094

    Original file (20080012094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since there is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action on any date other than 11 September 1969 or that he was wounded on more than one occasion on 11 September 1969, there is insufficient evidence on which to base any additional awards of the Purple Heart in this case. Evidence of record shows the applicant served in Vietnam from 10 May 1969 to 28 October 1969, and in Korea from 7 February 1971 to 23 September 1971. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013250

    Original file (20100013250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This decision states, in pertinent part, "Service medical records show he suffered a minor fragment wound in the back of the neck in January 1970 when he was struck by fragments of an AK-47 bullet which had hit his aircraft. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012212

    Original file (20080012212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was wounded three times in 1969 and that he never received his additional awards of the Purple Heart. However, the orders awarding him the Purple Heart are not on file in his official records. There is no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence to support his contention that he is entitled to the award of the Purple Heart (Second Oak Leaf Cluster).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017766

    Original file (20120017766.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Therefore, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013735

    Original file (20080013735.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he received shrapnel wounds while serving in Vietnam but he did not receive the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statement provided by the applicant is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007228

    Original file (20100007228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicant's service personnel records. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019252

    Original file (20080019252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show award of the Purple Heart. There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel service record awarding him the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting the applicant's DD Form 214 with a separation date of 28 October 1971 to add the following awards: a. the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 17 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008953

    Original file (20090008953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that he was among the wounded. The available evidence also shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result of being hit by nails from a claymore on 11 April 1969. Evidence of record shows that although he received orders for a Purple Heart for wounds received on 4 August 1969 while assigned to the 12th Evacuation Hospital there is no evidence of record nor did the applicant provide any evidence which shows he was wounded on 4 August 1969.