IN THE CASE OF: .
BOARD DATE: 4 AUGUST 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090003593
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show three awards of the Purple Heart instead of two.
2. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 contains incorrect information.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 23 March 1973, and a copy of General Orders Number 107, issued by Headquarters, 3rd Surgical Hospital, on 8 September 1971, showing award of the Purple Heart (3rd Award), in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. With prior enlisted service, the applicants records show he was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army in the rank of second lieutenant on 15 February 1968 and entered active duty on 14 April 1968. He completed the Infantry Officer Basic Course and was promoted through the ranks to captain (CPT) on 14 April 1970. He was honorably retired on 23 March 1973 by reason of physical disability.
3. The applicants records show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 6 May 1969 to on or about 2 July 1969 and from on or about 10 April 1971 to on or about 31 October 1971. He was assigned to the U.S. Military Assistance Command Vietnam (MACV).
4. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicants DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Purple Heart (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Bronze Star Medal, the Parachutist Badge, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and one overseas service bar.
5. Headquarters, 71st Evacuation Hospital, General Orders Number 141, dated 7 June 1969, show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart (1st Award) for wounds received in action on 6 June 1969.
6. Headquarters, 3rd Surgical Hospital, General Orders Number 107, dated 8 September 1971, show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart (3rd Award) for wounds received in action on 29 September 1971.
7. Headquarters, Fort Leonard Wood Medical Department Activity, Fort Leonard Wood, MO, General Orders Number 61, dated 24 August 1972, show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 29 September 1971.
8. Headquarters, Fort Leonard Wood Medical Department Activity, Fort Leonard Wood, MO, General Orders Number 80, dated on an unknown date, amended General Orders Number 61, dated 24 August 1972, to show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart (1st Oak Leaf Cluster).
9. The applicant's name is shown once on the Vietnam Casualty Roster under code 23, indicating he was wounded as a result of hostile action. The date of injury/wound is listed as 6 June 1969.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that his DD Form 14 should be corrected to show three awards of the Purple Heart.
2. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in the Republic of Vietnam on 6 June 1969 and was accordingly awarded his first award of the Purple Heart.
3. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant suffered a second wound/injury in the Republic of Vietnam on 29 September 1971 and was awarded his second award of the Purple Heart. However, the general orders that announced his award of the Purple Heart for this injury erroneously listed it as his third award.
4. The evidence of record further shows that upon his arrival at Fort Leonard Wood, he was issued a second order awarding him the Purple Heart for the same injury that occurred on 29 September 1971 and that this order was later amended to show this award of the Purple Heart as his second award.
5. There is no evidence in the applicants records and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence that shows he was wounded or injured a third time as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. In the absence of documentation that shows he suffered a third wound/injury as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base a third award of the Purple Heart in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X_____ ____X____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _XXX______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090003593
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090003593
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022086
The applicant qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and he served in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. d. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), based on the available evidence it would be appropriate to award the applicant this medal and correct his DD Form 214 to show the award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006739
There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart. He is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal; however, the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show this award among his authorized awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart; the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal; the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001692C070206
There are no orders in the FSM’s service personnel record which shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the FSM's records to show this badge. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the FSM concerned by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal; and b. adding the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Good Conduct Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001692C070206
Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the FSM's records to show this badge. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the FSM's records to show this unit award. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the FSM concerned by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal; and b. adding the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Good Conduct Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Grenade...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017773
The applicant's records do not contain General Orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit and that he was wounded in action during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 27 April 1971 in the Republic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003972
The applicant states the award is not listed on his DD Form 214. This pamphlet shows the 3rd Battalion, 8th Infantry, was cited for award of the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period October 1966 through 28 July 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 3, dated 1970 * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal with First Class Unit Citation for the period 1 October 1966 through 31 October 1969 by DAGO Number 53, dated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020645
There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows the applicant was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), Air Medal, and Bronze Star Medal based on the award certificates and citations he provides, along with any other awards he may be authorized. Thus, the two certificates document the same incident for which general...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010582
The applicant states: * the citation for the Army Commendation Medal he was awarded while in Vietnam supports his engagement in direct combat action * the item 40 (Wounds) entry on his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received a shrapnel wound to the right leg and supports his entitlement to the Purple Heart * a Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device was pinned on him in formation at the 101st Airborne Headquarters, but he does not have a record of it * he was informed he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003334
A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that he was WIA on a third occasion, or any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the PH (2nd OLC). c. The VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002326C070206
However, item 38 (record of assignments) on his Department of the Army Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) contains a penciled entry replacing his typed duty MOS (military occupational specialty) of 71B20 with a duty MOS of 11E and a handwritten principal duty title of "tank armored" over the typed entry of clerk typist. The evidence confirms the applicant did hold an infantry specialty, was assigned to a cavalry unit, was wounded as a result of hostile actions, and the statement...