Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004687
Original file (20080004687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080004687 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be given active duty service credit for the time he served in Vietnam even though he was assigned to a civilian organization; and that he be promoted one grade, to Lieutenant Colonel, on the retired list, retroactive to the date he returned to the United States in August 1974.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was essentially a member of the US Forces in Vietnam because of his advisory status with the Vietnamese Army Joint General Staff, J-4.  Because of the agreement signed between the United States and North Vietnam in Paris in early 1973, no military personnel, except for 50 uniformed members assigned to the Defense Attaché Office in Saigon, were allowed in country; therefore, those who were sent there to assist after removal of US Forces were considered civilians.

3.  In support of his application, the applicant submitted a self-authored letter explaining his rationale supporting his request; a copy of a job description for an Financial Analyst, as of 25 July 1973; a copy of a DA Form 2496, Disposition Form, Subject:  Security Clearance, dated 7 May 1973; a copy of page 1 of 10 pages of Policies and Standards in force at the Computer Sciences Corporation, dated 26 January 1973; a copy of a letter written to him by a Vietnamese friend and one-time comrade; a letter he wrote to a former Secretary of Defense about his Vietnamese friend and one-time comrade, dated 17 October 1988; an extract from a publication, titled, "Vietnam From Cease-Fire to Capitulation"; a copy of a chapter [Chapter8] from a book titled, "The Decline of U.S. Support, Military Assistance, Fiscal Year 1974"; a copy of a DD Form 730, Receipt for Unused Transportation Requests and/or Tickets Including Unused Meal Tickets, dated 9 August 1973; a copy of a Questionnaire – CS, which he completed for his employer; a page having copies of a variety of identification and privilege cards; a copy of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, with an effective date of his separation on 30 June 1969; and a copy of Department of the Army Special Orders Number 31, dated 14 February 1969, which announced his retirement from active duty in the rank and pay grade, Major, O-4.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he was commissioned a Second Lieutenant in the Reserve on 23 August 1956.  Prior to being commissioned, he served in the Air Force as a noncommissioned officer in the rank and pay grade, Technical Sergeant, E-6.  The record also shows that he had prior service in the Army as a noncommissioned officer in the rank and pay grade, Sergeant First Class, E-6. 

3.  After receiving his commission in the Army, the applicant served on active duty until he was honorably separated for the purpose of retirement.

4.  The evidence shows that the applicant was promoted to the rank and pay grade, Major, O-4 on 19 July 1967.

5.  On 3 February 1969, the applicant was given the opportunity to continue his service by being retained on active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-173, Section V, until 31 July 1972.  On 12 February 1969, the applicant declined the offer and opted to submit his request for voluntary non-disability retirement.

6.  Item 17 (Foreign Service), of the applicant's DA Form 66, Officer Qualification Record, shows he served in Vietnam, as an Army officer for the period 17 June 1968 through 17 May 1969.

7.  The applicant was separated, on 30 June 1969, in the rank and pay grade, Major, O-4, for the purpose of retirement.  The evidence shows he was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 July 1970 in compliance with Special Orders Number 31, Headquarters, Department of the Army, dated 14 February 1969.  On the date of his separation, he had served 21 years, 8 months and 16 days total service of which 21 years, 2 months and 12 days were active service.

8.  There is no evidence in the applicant's service record, and he provided none, to show he was recalled to active duty after his transfer to the Retired Reserve.

9.  The applicant provided a DA Form 2496, Subject:  Security Clearance, dated 7 May 1973, which shows he was granted an interim secret security clearance.  The applicant's rank shown on the form is that of a GS-13 [a civilian employee].

10.  The applicant submitted a CSCD Form No. 1, Subject:  Assignment of CSC Employees to Vietnam, dated 26 January 1973.  Paragraph 1.6, in the Policy Statement section of the form, contains a statement that indicates the applicant was in Vietnam as a contract employee with a Government service equivalent grade of GS-13.  This statement reads, in part, "The employee will sign an agreement as to the length of the assignment."

11.  On page 19 of an extract from the book, U.S. Organization for the Cease-Fire, is information that the DAO (Defense Attaché Office) was authorized only 50 military and 1,200 civilian employees.  

12.  The applicant did not provide reference to a Federal statute which provides or provided for the conversion of service spent as a contract employee to the Federal Government to creditable military service.  He also did not provide a reference to a Federal statute which would allow the promotion of a recalled mobilized retiree [which he was not] to the next higher grade than that in which he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

13.  Mobilized retirees are not eligible for promotion. A retiree may be eligible for an increase in retirement pay if the time spent on mobilization/recall increases the individual's years of service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 July 1970 in the rank of Major, pay grade, O-4.

2.  There is no evidence, and the applicant provided none, to show he was ever recalled to active duty in his retired pay grade.

3.  The evidence does show that while the applicant was still on active duty, he was given the opportunity to remain on active duty until 31 July 1972.  The applicant declined the offer and instead opted to submit his application for voluntary, non-disability retirement.  The additional time he would have gained, had he accepted the offer, could very well have earned him the promotion he now seeks.

4.  There is no evidence the applicant was assigned to Vietnam to one of the 50 military spaces that were agreed to by the Governments of Vietnam and the United States.  On the contrary, the evidence shows he was hired by a civilian firm doing business with the Government of the United States and he was a contract civilian employee of that firm who held a Government-equivalent grade of GS-13 and he perhaps occupied one of the 1,200 authorized civilian spaces with the Defense Attaché Office.

5.  The applicant did not provide reference to a Federal statute which provides or provided for the conversion of service spent as a contract employee to the Federal Government to creditable military service.  He also did not provide a reference to a Federal statute which would allow the promotion of a recalled mobilized retiree [which he was not] to the next higher grade than that in which he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.  The applicant is advised that the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records is not an investigative agency and makes decisions based on the information that applicants provide in support of their cases.

6.  Based on the evidence in this case, the applicant is not entitled to have the time he spent in Vietnam as a contract employee, after his retirement from the Army, converted to creditable active duty service time.  In addition, the applicant is not entitled to a promotion in the Retired Reserve, to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel, pay grade, O-5.  The applicant is advised that currently, mobilized retired officers, which the evidence shows the applicant was not, are prohibited from being promoted; however, they may be entitled to an increase in their retired pay when they are restored to the Retired Reserve at the conclusion of their service.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




       _   _____x__   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004687





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004687



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005854

    Original file (20080005854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was released from Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status as a lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O-5 after 20 years of active Federal service effective 15 September 2002. He was promoted to COL on 27 October 2004 and served more than 3 years as a Reserve Officer while at the same time serving as a full-time technician. He served for a period of 10 months on active duty after his promotion to COL/O-6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007566

    Original file (20100007566.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ABCMR decides cases on the evidence of record; it is not an investigative body. The Army, by law, may pay claims for amounts due to applicants as a result of correction of military records. In his original application, and even subsequent to the Board's decision, neither he nor his counsel raised the issue of serving through 30 years or requesting the maximum retired pay allowed at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086231C070212

    Original file (2003086231C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, he was instead recalled to active duty as a "Retired On Active Duty Officer." Section 12307 states that a member in a retired status is not eligible for promotion (or for consideration for promotion) as a Reserve. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017531

    Original file (20110017531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests to be granted combat-related special compensation (CRSC). He requests payment of CRSC for this disability because he served in combat in Vietnam and his VA medical record indicates, "The presumption that this condition is related to his time in Vietnam has been established through the VA Compensation and Pension Service endorsed by the Veterans Board of Appeals (VBA)."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007228

    Original file (20090007228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was voluntarily recalled to active duty in the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC), pay grade O-5. Army Regulation 600-8-24 (Officer Transfers) provides, in pertinent part, that a commissioned officer must serve on active duty for 3 years in grade to retire in a rank above MAJ and below lieutenant general. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was voluntarily recalled to active duty as a retiree in his retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008471

    Original file (20120008471.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel provides: * 1994 retirement DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * 2008 release from active duty DD Form 214 * extracts of Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), sections 501, 502, 505, 506, 207, 688, and 688a * letters from the Assistant Secretary of Defense to the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Forces * Department of Defense (DOD) report on a study regarding promotion eligibility of retired officers recalled to active duty * memorandum from the Assistant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017880

    Original file (20090017880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to show he was recalled to active duty (AD) in the grade of lieutenant colonel (LTC/O-5) vice major (MAJ/O-4). A retired Soldier recalled to AD will normally be ordered to AD in their current grade on the retired list. There is no evidence to show he was promoted to LTC before he retired.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019115

    Original file (20140019115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * his five deployments as a Department of the Army (DA) civilian be recognized as active duty military service * the issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and/or DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) reflecting his service and all associated awards and decorations 2. Organization clothing and individual equipment will be issued to EE personnel and other civilians who may be deployed in support of military operations. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066265C070421

    Original file (2001066265C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be granted a United States Army Reserve (USAR) Retirement, effective when he reached age 60. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was illegally denied a USAR Retirement at age 60, when he had previously been certified as eligible for retirement in 1979. On 16 February 2000, the ARPERSCOM, in response to an application for retired pay at age 60 from the applicant, informed him that he was not eligible for retired pay at age 60 because he had only 8 years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017104

    Original file (20140017104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 601-10 (Management and Recall to Active Duty of Retired Soldiers of the Army in Support of Mobilization and Peacetime Operations) provides in paragraph 2-4d (Active Duty Grade and Promotion) that retired military personnel recalled to active duty in a retired status are not eligible for promotion. The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been carefully considered;...