Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017880
Original file (20090017880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090017880 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to show he was recalled to active duty (AD) in the grade of lieutenant colonel (LTC/O-5) vice major (MAJ/O-4).  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was selected for promotion to LTC prior to his retirement from AD and his last Officer Evaluation Report states "Promote him if he is recalled to AD."  He also states, in effect, when he was recalled to AD it was as a MAJ but once he was activated his grade and rank would be adjusted to LTC based upon his qualifications and the fact that he previously served in LTC/O-5 positions.  

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:

* memorandum from the US Army Military Personnel Center ( now Human Resources Command [HRC]) dated 11 October 1984 
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) 
* DA Form 67-8 (Officer Evaluation Report)
* Orders Number A-12-826748, dated 24 December 2008 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows he was commissioned and entered active duty on 20 October 1964.

2.  The applicant submitted a copy of a memorandum from the US Army Military Personnel Center dated 11 October 1984 congratulating him for selection for promotion to LTC.

3.  The applicant submitted a copy of his DA Form 67-8 for the period 29 January 1984 to 28 January 1985 which shows in Part Ve (Comments on potential) "In the event of a recall to active duty, he should be recalled in the grade of LTC."

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 contains the following entries:

* 4a (grade, rate, or rank) MAJ
* 4b (pay grade) O-4
* 12b (separation date this period) 28 February 1985

5.  Orders Number A-12-826748, HRC-St. Louis, dated 24 December 2008, show the applicant was recalled from retired status in the grade of MAJ/O-4 effective 15 February 2009.

6.  In the processing of this case, on 3 February 2010, an advisory opinion was provided by the Chief Special Actions Branch, DA Promotions.  The advisory official noted the applicant was requesting that his AD recall orders be corrected to reflect "selected for promotion to LTC and/or a review of whether a higher grade is warranted."  The advisory concludes by stating "by law the Army has no authority to promote the applicant once he retires."  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 12307 (10 USC 12307) states a member of the Retired Reserves, recalled to AD, is not eligible for promotion or consideration for promotion.

7.  The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for comment.  In response to the advisory opinion, he submitted the following documents:

* a copy of his DA Form 71(Oath of Office- Military Personnel), showing he was commissioned in the RA on 11 August 1978
* Memorandum from Headquarters, Task Force Marne, showing his duty position and grade of position
* Memorandum of record subject:  Applicant's Duty Performance

8.  The applicant states, in effect, in his rebuttal that paragraph one of his orders states he was recalled to AD from retiree status meaning he is no longer Retired or in the Retired Reserve but is serving on AD in the active Army not as a Reserve (Reservist) and that his RA oath states "having been appointed an Officer in the RA he will well and faithfully discharge those duties."  

9.  Army Regulation 601-10 (Management and Mobilization of Retired Soldiers of the Army) provides policy and procedures for the management and mobilization of retired Soldiers of the Army.  Paragraph 2-5 states in pertinent part that Retired Soldiers ordered to AD will be ordered to AD in their current grade on the retired list unless otherwise directed by HQDA.  A retired Soldier who previously served on AD satisfactorily, as determined by the Secretary of the Army, in a grade higher than that Soldier's retired grade, may be ordered to AD in the highest grade held satisfactorily.  Retired military personnel recalled to AD in retired status are not eligible for promotion. 

10.  10 USC 12307 states in pertinent part that a member of the Retired Reserve who is ordered to active duty or other appropriate duty in a retired status may be credited under chapter 1223 of this title with service performed pursuant to such order.  A member in a retired status is not eligible for promotion (or for consideration for promotion) as a Reserve. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The  evidence of record confirms that in 1985, the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve in the grade of MAJ/O-4.  It also shows he was recalled from Retired Status to AD in the rank of MAJ in February 2009.  A retired Soldier recalled to AD will normally be ordered to AD in their current grade on the retired list.  In the applicant's case, that grade was MAJ.  

2.  Although the evidence shows the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC/O-5 prior to his retirement, it is likely he already had an approved retirement since he retired 4 months after he was selected for promotion.  There is no evidence to show he was promoted to LTC before he retired.  As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support correcting his record to show he was recalled to AD as an LTC/O-5.  

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4.  There is no evidence the announced policy or implementing guidance for the program under which he was accepted for Army service was amended or modified to allow for the promotion of officers who were recalled to AD from their retired status.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017880



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007228

    Original file (20090007228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was voluntarily recalled to active duty in the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC), pay grade O-5. Army Regulation 600-8-24 (Officer Transfers) provides, in pertinent part, that a commissioned officer must serve on active duty for 3 years in grade to retire in a rank above MAJ and below lieutenant general. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was voluntarily recalled to active duty as a retiree in his retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011178C070206

    Original file (20050011178C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he served from November 1967 to March 1974 as a Reserve officer on active duty (AD). While serving on AD, in the rank of SGM/E-9, the applicant was promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer to lieutenant colonel effective 11 December 1986, without being called to AD in that rank. The Board also finds no evidence that the applicant served 6 consecutive months on active duty as a LTC/O-5 or to show that he served satisfactorily in the grade of LTC in an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013721

    Original file (20090013721.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Also on the same date, by letter, HRC-St. Louis notified him that he was promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army to LTC with an effective date of 11 January 2005 and a DOR of 15 April 2004. e. In the applicant's application, he submitted a letter from MG (Retired) V-----, who served as TAG of the State of Massachusetts at the time the applicant was appointed to MAJ in the MAARNG, dated 1 March 2010. Army Regulation 135-155 provides policy for the selection and promotion of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021149

    Original file (20100021149.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in his official record to show that he served in an LTC/O-5 position on or after 11 June 1986. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records to show that he was placed on the TDRL in the rank/grade of LTC/O-5 effective 13 November 1986 with entitlement to all back retired pay from that date and that he was subsequently permanently retired in that pay grade on 13 November 1991. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011785

    Original file (20100011785.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The official indicates the applicant was selected for promotion to MAJ/O-4 and on 30 June 1995, he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. As a result, absent any evidence that he was offered the opportunity to transfer to the IRR to accept promotion or that he voluntarily agreed to delay his promotion, it would be appropriate to correct his record to show he was transferred to the IRR on 29 January 1995 (the day after his Statement of Retirement Points indicates he stopped participating...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018669

    Original file (20090018669.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the original review of this case it was determined the applicant voluntarily requested and was granted retirement in the rank of major prior to completing the 3 years of service as an LTC as required by law to retire in that grade. Further, the evidence fails to support a conclusion the family considerations that resulted in him declining his overseas assignment and requesting retirement rose to the level of extreme hardship, or exceptional or unusual circumstances, at the time he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069736C070402

    Original file (2002069736C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A 1989 USAR Standby Advisory Board reviewed his record and selected him for promotion to MAJ. A 1989 Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Proceedings directed that his discharge be voided, that he be promoted to MAJ, that he be credited with qualifying service for Reserve retirement, and that an explanation be placed in his records to show that the resulting gap in Officer Evaluation Reports (OERs) was due to no fault of the officer. On 18 October 1988, ARPERCEN issued...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018687

    Original file (20140018687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant truly believes that, after his acceptance of appointment to the rank/pay grade of chief warrant officer two (CW2)/W-2 and the pattern of his speedy advancement to the rank/pay grade of CW4/W-4, had he been retained on active duty as an RA officer in the rank/pay grade of MAJ/O-4, he would have advanced to at least the rank/pay grade of LTC/O-5 in a relatively short time and been able to retire in that grade. The applicant's requests for correction of his record to show that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017598

    Original file (20060017598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By Headquarters, First United States Army memorandum, dated 12 June 1987, the applicant was notified that he was promoted to the rank of MAJ effective 1 October 1985, with time in grade computed from 13 April 1983 (apparently not realizing the applicant had declined promotion in 1983). On 15 May 1992, the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM-STL, advised the applicant that Headquarters, First United States Army originally gave him his original date of rank of 13 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008772

    Original file (20080008772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 135-155 also states, in pertinent part, that an active duty officer, who is selected for promotion but removed from the ADL and placed in an active Reserve status prior to promotion, is not eligible for that promotion and that officer will be placed on the RASL and considered for promotion by a Reserve promotion board. With respect to the applicant's consideration for promotion to LTC by a Special Selection Board, there is no evidence in the applicantÂ’s records and the...