Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005858
Original file (20110005858.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110005858 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart.

2.  He states he was wounded on three separate occasions while in the jungles of Vietnam; however, he was never awarded the Purple Heart.  After searching for over 40 years, he finally found the medic who treated him.  During his tour in Vietnam, he had to clear a land zone and recover the remains of the deceased.  

3.  He adds that although he endured life threatening injuries, he had to stay out in the combat zone as long as he could due to the shortage of personnel and on some occasions, records of injuries never made it back to base camp.  

4.  He provides:

* His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* A self-authored statement
* A notarized personal witness statement

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His military service records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 December 1965.  Upon completion of training, he served in military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

* Item 31 (Foreign Service) – he served in Vietnam from 23 June 1966 through 20 July 1967
* Item 40 (Wounds) – is blank
* Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) – does not contain the Purple Heart

4.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 
14 December 1967 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show award of the Purple Heart.  

5.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster and his military medical records are not available for review.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 
and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Purple Heart.   

7.  He provided a self-authored statement which is addressed to Mr. W (a combat medic).  He lists the following incidents:

	a.  Between November and December 1966, he was serving as point man during a mission and upon exiting a stream, he stepped on a Pungi stake and sustained injuries to both feet.  The medic treated him with morphine and bandaged the wounds.

	b.  Between January and February 1967, a piece of shrapnel went through his back pack and into his back.  The medic treated him with morphine and bandaged the wound.

	c.  He also came down with jungle rot on several occasions, was sprayed with Agent Orange, pushed out of a helicopter and developed malaria.  He received treatment for all.  

	d.  He spent two weeks in Camron Bay Hospital toward the end of his tour, he was reassigned to a trucking company and then was sent back to the United States.  

8.  He provided a notarized personal witness statement from his medic in Vietnam.  The medic states he remembers the applicant and removing shrapnel from his back; however, he did not give him morphine, but gave him penicillin instead.  This is all he remembers due to his own diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). 

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  There is no statute of limitations governing requests for award of the Purple Heart.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His request for award of the PH was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the available evidence of record.  

2.  The medic remembers removing the shrapnel from the applicant’s back and treating him with penicillin.  However, there is no evidence to show that the applicant was treated for a wound which was a result of hostile action.  

3.  In the absence of such evidence there is an insufficient basis on which to grant the requested relief.  Should the applicant obtain a copy of his medical records or some other form of documentation which show his injuries were a result of hostile action and were treated by medical personnel, he can use that documentation as new evidence to resubmit his request. 



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.




ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005858





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005858



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010189

    Original file (20120010189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He served in Vietnam as infantryman from August 1969 to June 1970; he was assigned as a platoon sergeant to A Company, 3rd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade * Between August and October 1969, he was wounded; his unit received small arms fire during a patrol; he dropped to the ground near a rock when a bullet hit the rock next to his hand and fragments injured his hand * After the shooting stopped, a medic examined his wound and gave him a topical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000829

    Original file (20150000829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He has the piece of shrapnel that was taken from his arm while at the hospital. There is no medical evidence in his available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action while in an active duty status. He provides a statement of support wherein one individual stated the applicant was wounded in the arm and had not shot himself.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009738

    Original file (20080009738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant served in Vietnam from 25 November 1967 to 24 October 1968. He stated that as a medic in the Republic of Vietnam, he remembered the applicant being wounded by shrapnel. However, the combat medic, nor the applicant, provided evidence to show that this medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009552

    Original file (20100009552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was not awarded the Purple Heart at the time of his injuries. As he was running toward the replacement personnel, he found himself lying face down on the ground. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provided insufficient evidence to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action, which required treatment by medical personnel, and that the treatment was made a matter of official record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013421

    Original file (20130013421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His medical record is not available for review. In his statement, Mr. Cxxxxx states the following: As a combat medic of Company D 4th Division 1st of the 12th from 1967-1968 in the Republic of Vietnam, I remember Sergeant Hxxx Lxxxxxxx being wounded going up Hill 875. The applicant contends he should be awarded the Purple Heart; however, neither his available record nor the Vietnam casualty roster provide any evidence that shows he was wounded during his period of service in the Republic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013168

    Original file (20120013168.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records contain no evidence showing he was wounded in action in Vietnam or that he was treated for any such wounds. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears the applicant should have received the AGCM (1st Award) for his service from 3 August 1967 through 30 March 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010753

    Original file (20100010753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090003313 on 30 July 2009. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster; his DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012068

    Original file (20090012068.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080009738, on 16 December 2008. The applicant provided a copy of a letter from a combat medic who stated that as a medic in the Republic of Vietnam, he remembered the applicant being wounded by shrapnel. In the absence of medical records that show the applicant was treated for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011760

    Original file (20060011760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) that he be awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's new argument, as stated in his request, is that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for a wound sustained in 1967, in Phu Bai, Vietnam, during a mortar attack. However, there is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he sustained a wound in 1967, in Vietnam, during a mortar...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000485

    Original file (20130000485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. An artillery round jungle pack exploded. The letters of support and other evidence provided by the applicant has been reviewed; however, there was no investigation conducted at the time of the incident to show the explosion was the direct result of enemy action (a booby-trapped artillery round).