RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 19 APRIL 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040004448
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Raymond Wagner | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Larry Bergquist | |Member |
| |Mr. Larry Olson | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and reconsideration of
his earlier appeal to correct his military records by award of the Bronze
Star Medal.
2. The applicant states that the award of the Bronze Star Medal was never
awarded or the award was lost. He states, in effect, that his injury
showing that he was wounded in action lacked proper documentation. His
injury was wrongly attributed to “jungle rot.” He has been trying for 20
years to correct his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. He
was unaware of the criteria for award of the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant provides a copy of a 1986 application to this Board
requesting award of the Bronze Star Medal and the second award of the Air
Medal; a copy of a 24 May 2000 letter to a Member of Congress (MC)
requesting assistance in obtaining the award of the Purple Heart; a copy of
a 22 January 2001 Army Personnel Command Military Awards Branch letter to a
MC regarding award of the Purple Heart; a copy of the applicant’s DD Form
214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge); a copy of a 25 January 1991 DD Form
215 correcting his DD Form 214; and copies of his medical
records.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 3 February 1971. The application submitted in this case
is dated 15 July 2004.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were
summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AC86-
07589, on 14 December 1988. The Board on that date considered and
denied his request for award of the Bronze Star Medal and the second award
of the Air Medal.
4. The applicant was inducted into the Army on 4 February 1969, trained as
an infantryman, and in August 1969 was assigned to Company D, 1st
Battalion, 35th Infantry, in Vietnam.
5. An 11 November 1969 medical report indicates that he had “jungle rot”
of his right anterior leg two weeks ago, which gradually became ulcerated,
and three days ago developed cellulitis of his right leg. The report
indicates that he had a ½ inch ulcerated, clean-looking lesion to his right
anterior leg. On 16 November 1969 the abscess to his right leg was
drained. He was discharged from the hospital to duty on 9 December 1969.
6. On 8 March 1970 the applicant was transferred to a unit of the 3d
Battalion, 12th Infantry. He completed his tour of duty in Vietnam and
returned to the United States in July 1970. He participated in four
campaigns during his tour of duty in Vietnam.
7. The applicant was assigned to Fort Carson, Colorado, and was released
from active duty on 3 February 1971. His DD Form 214 did not reflect all
the awards due him; however, except for credit for participation in four
campaigns, this oversight was corrected on 25 January 1991.
8. On 22 August 1986 the applicant requested his medical records stating,
“specifically those during his hospitalization for jungle rot at 4th Med at
Cam Rahn Bay also for typhus at Cam Rahn Bay.” He stated that he needed
those records to review his medical history for a possible Agent Orange
claim to be filed.
9. In his 24 May 2000 letter to a MC, the applicant stated that he
sustained a punji stake laceration puncture to his lower right leg on or
about 5 November 1969, the wound was treated by a medic, but later became
sore and infected with “jungle rot.” He was sent back to the rear and was
admitted to the 4th Med. Cellulitis had set in. He was sent to the 71st
Evacuation Hospital where the abscessed right leg was operated on and
drained.
10. On 22 January 2001 the Military Awards Branch at the Army Personnel
Command informed a MC that they had reviewed the casualty list for Vietnam
and did not find a record that the applicant had been wounded. They also
informed him that the documentation provided in support of his request did
not indicate that the abscess in his leg was the result of enemy action.
11. The applicant has not provided any new evidence or argument concerning
his request for award of the Bronze Star Medal.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for
a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence
must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action,
the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have
been made a matter of official record. Examples of enemy-related injuries
include an injury caused by enemy bullet, shrapnel, or other projectile
created by enemy action, and injury caused by enemy placed mine or trap.
13. Service stars are worn on campaign and service ribbons to denote an
additional award. The service star is a bronze or silver five pointed
star. A silver star is worn instead of five bronze service stars. Service
stars are authorized for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. A wound sustained by a punji stick in Vietnam is conducive to award of
the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding the applicant’s contentions, however, he
has not provided evidence to show that his “jungle rot” was caused by a
punji stick. There is no corroborating evidence to support his claim.
While the Board has no reason to doubt the statement of events he has
provided, such individual statements are acceptable only where
corroborating evidence is available from official sources. In the absence
of evidence showing that he was wounded as a result of hostile action,
there are no grounds for award of the Purple Heart.
2. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative
error that does not require action by the Board. The necessary corrections
will be accomplished administratively by the Case Management Support
Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined in paragraph 3 of the
Determination/Recommendation section below.
3. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 3 February 1971; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 2 February 1974. However, the applicant
did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided
a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the
interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__RW___ ___LB___ ___LO __ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned or to amend the
decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AC86-07589, dated 14
December 1988.
2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.
3. The Case Management Support Division in St. Louis is requested to
correct the applicant’s records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal
with four bronze service stars.
____ Raymond Wagner_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20040004448 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20050419 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |107.00 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040004448lC070208
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by award of the Bronze Star Medal. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board. The Case Management Support Division in St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03099238C070212
On 14 April 2003, in response to an inquiry from a Member of Congress (MC), the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) stated that the applicant was not listed as being wounded on the casualty report records, and that verification of entitlement to additional awards of the Purple Heart might be possible by obtaining unit morning reports and hospital admission listings, and that the applicant should contact the National Personnel Records Center for this information. There is no medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004427
The applicant served in Vietnam during two campaign periods and is authorized to wear two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal. Based on the above facts and findings, it is appropriate to correct the record by awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received on 28 February 1967 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show that in addition to the awards listed, he is also authorized award of the Purple Heart, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011409
The evidence of record also shows that General Orders awarded the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 23 January 1967. The applicant's military service records contain no evidence, nor do casualty reports for the Vietnam Conflict document that the applicant sustained an injury to his right knee from a punji stick while serving in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012641
He states: a. the letter [previous proceedings] from the Board stated his records were lost in a fire; therefore, it couldn't be determined that his name was placed on the direct casualty roster for the Vietnam War; b. the entry "Dir Cas" [direct casualty] is recorded on the DA Form 8-275-3 (Clinical Record Cover Sheet) he provided; c. he provided quotes from the Admitting Officer who is a renowned physician in the field of Nephrology [study of kidneys] in Newark, NJ; d. he cited an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007629
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 July 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080007629 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Regrettably, in view of the lack of substantiating evidence the Purple Heart award certificate and the 13 March 1969 letter are insufficient evidence to verify that he was wounded in action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the Purple Heart and showing this award on his DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010329
While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart is not questioned, absent evidence which conclusively proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, regrettably, there is insufficient basis for awarding the Purple Heart to the applicant in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009087
The evidence shows the applicant was involved in a tussle and not in a firefight. There were no entries made in his service personnel records to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action and no orders were published to award him the Purple Heart for a wound he may have received on 18 July 1968. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. awarding the applicant the Vietnam Service Medal, with four...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068494C070402
His WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) shows as authorized awards the Combat Infantryman Badge, the World War II Victory Medal, the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, the Philippine Liberation Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star, the Army Good Conduct Medal, and the Meritorious Unit Emblem. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001963C070206
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant’s military personnel file does not contain any medical treatment documents and the applicant’s medical records were not available for review. The applicant’s DA Form 20 shows he was injured by a punji stake while serving in Vietnam.