Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002077
Original file (20080002077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080002077 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the zip code on his amended Orders Number 265-001, dated 22 September 2003, be corrected to show the zip code of "98345" instead of the zip code "46031." 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his amended orders, Orders Number 265-001, dated 22 September 2003, show the zip code of "46031" and the correct zip code is "98345."  The incorrect zip code resulted in pay problems for him for the period from September 2003 until approximately December 2004.  During this period, he experienced an approximately $146.00 per month pay shortage.  He states that all avenues have been exhausted to correct the issue. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his PCS (Permanent Change of Station) orders, with amendment; two copies of his LES (Leave and Earning Statement); several Query Results for BAH (Basic Allowance for Housing); and copies of numerous emails in support of his request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is currently serving on active duty as a staff sergeant (SSG/E-6) overseas.




2.  The applicant provided a copy of Headquarters, United States Army Japan (Forward Support Team) Orders Number 177-08, dated 26 June 2003, which reassigned him from his parent unit overseas to the Yakima Veterinary Section, Yakima Firing Center, Washington, with an assigned zip code of "98926" which represents the city of Ellensburg, Washington, according to the United States Postal Service (USPS).

3.  The applicant provided a copy of Headquarters, United States Army Medical Command (USAMEDCOM) Orders Number 265-001, dated 22 September 2003, which amended Orders Number 177-08, dated 26 June 2003, to show that he was assigned to the Navy Food Management Team Bremerton, Bremerton, Washington, with an erroneously applied zip code of "46031."  This zip code represents Atlanta, Indiana, according to the USPS.

4.  The applicant provided Query Results for BAH rates for the zip codes of 98926, which represented Yakima, Washington, and zip code 98345, which represents Bremerton, Washington.  The query also provided the monthly allowance for an E-6 with and without dependents for the assigned zip codes.

5.  The applicant provided a copy of his LES for the month of November 2004 which shows that he was paid single BAQ (Basic Allowance for Quarters) according to zip code 98926 which represents Yakima, Washington.  His LES for the month of December 2004 shows he was paid BAQ according to zip code 98345, which represents Keyport, Washington, according to the USPS. 

6.  The applicant provided several copies of emails that were transmitted between him and personnel at USAMEDCOM and VETCOM (Veterinary Command).  He states that he spoke to reassignment personnel at Fort Lewis, Washington, in regards to adding his dependents to his orders.  He was informed that since he did not turn in his levy packet to inform them of his intentions and what to annotate on his orders, his orders were published with, "Dependents NO."  He was informed to contact 1st PERSCOM (Personnel Command – sic United States Army Republic of Japan [USARJ] who originally published his reassignment orders) to get it changed.  Personnel informed him that they had been working on the issue for a year and a half but still no results.  The applicant informed USAMEDCOM/VETCOM that DFAS (Defense Finance and Accounting Service) would not pay him until orders were corrected.  





7.  Through email, USAMEDCOM informed the applicant that they had exhausted all the avenues that they could pursue.  They believed that the only recourse, due to the passage of time, was to apply to this Board for relief to correct his amended orders to show the correct zip code.  USAMEDCOM informed the applicant that they could not amend another organization's orders.  They were aware that he had been attempting to correct the zip code for over 4 years and that he should coordinate through personnel channels.  USAMEDCOM made follow-up calls to the losing command, with no supporting response. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows that the applicant was reassigned from his overseas assignment to the Yakima Veterinary Section, Yakima Firing Center, Washington, with an assigned zip code of "98926."  Orders were amended to show assignment to the Navy Food Management Team Bremerton, Washington, with an assigned zip code of "46301" which was incorrect and which represented Atlanta, Indiana.  

2.  The applicant attempted to get and requested assistance in correcting Headquarters, USAMEDCOM Orders Number 265-001, dated 22 September 2003, to show the correct zip code of 98345 which represented Bremerton, Washington.  He contacted USAMEDCOM/VETCOM for assistance and they informed him that they were unable to assist him.  He was informed that they could not amend another organization's orders and that DFAS would not pay him until orders were correct. 

3.  USAMEDCOM informed the applicant that they had exhausted all avenues they could pursue and that the only recourse, due to the passage of time, was to apply to this Board for relief in correcting his orders to show the correct zip code. 

4.  The applicant is serving on active duty and the next higher command to correct his amended orders to show the correct zip code is AHRC-Alexandra.  Due to the passage of time, and in the interest of justice, fairness, and equity, the Board recommends that AHRC correct the applicant's amended 
Orders Number 256-001, dated 22 September 2003, issued by Headquarters, USAMEDCOM based on HQDA assignment instructions, to show the zip code of "98345."  The DFAS should pay the applicant all back pay and allowances to which he is entitled due to the correction of his zip code.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: 

	a.  AHRC amending Headquarters, USAMEDCOM Orders Number 
265-001, dated 22 September 2003, to show the zip code of "98345" and that DFAS be provided a copy of this amended order; and

	b.  having DFAS audit the applicant’s record and correct the applicant's pay discrepancy and provide him all back pay and allowances due as a result of this zip code correction and change.




       _       _x_________
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002077



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002077



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010825

    Original file (20100010825.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, item 24 (Character of Service) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 June 2004 be changed to honorable; item 26 (Separation Code) be corrected to show "JFR" or "JHJ"; item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) be corrected to show "Disability Other" or "Unsatisfactory Performance"; and item 29 (Dates of Time Lost During This Period) be corrected to show "None." The applicant states: * Item 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002348C070206

    Original file (20050002348C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the incorrect zip code used to determine the applicant's BAH entitlement was input into DFAS in February 2002. Notwithstanding the fact that the incorrect zip code for the applicant's BAH entitlement appeared on her monthly DFAS Military LES each month the evidence of record shows, and the applicant acknowledges, that she failed to initiate administrative action to correct the erroneous zip code for over two years; including a period of 14 months while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005296

    Original file (20080005296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states that without further information of deployment status of her gaining unit, the orders issuing authority at Fort Lee, advised her to include her son on her orders and that if he did not travel with her to Germany, his concurrent travel orders would be null and void after 60 days and she would have to apply for command sponsorship in order to take him to Germany. The applicant provides in support of her application, a Memorandum for Record from her commander, dated 27 December...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003879

    Original file (20150003879.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect: * he received a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) informing him of a $13,317.70 debt as a result of overpayment of BAH from 1 March 2004 to 30 January 2005 * DFAS assumed that he was not entitled to BAH at all when in fact he was deployed to Iraq during this period * During this period, he was paid BAH at the O-3 rate, with dependents, at zip code 27520, at $1,211.00 per month; this was the proper amount * his records were updated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105799C070208

    Original file (2004105799C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 17 September 1991. Orders dated 31 July 2003 show the applicant was discharged from the USAR on 26 August 2003 with a general discharge. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015823

    Original file (20140015823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    h. DFAS letter to the applicant, dated 4 June 2014 (Exhibit L), that notified him of an adjustment in the SBP portion of his retired pay account based on documentation received from him. However, there is no evidence of record that shows the applicant notified DFAS concerning an error in his SBP coverage from the time that he retired from the U.S. Army on 25 March 2009 through May 2014. On 4 June 2014, DFAS notified the applicant of an adjustment in the SBP portion of his retired pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056961C070420

    Original file (2001056961C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected by refunding him a debt overpayment of $152.40. He received a second debt notice in September 2000, submitted a cancellation request on 31 October 2000, which was denied on 5 March 2001. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained for the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), Policy Team, System Liaison and Procedures Office, which states that the $152.46 represents a balance of an initial total over payment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051387C070420

    Original file (2001051387C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected by refunding him a debt overpayment of $152.40. He received a second debt notice in September 2000, submitted a cancellation request on 31 October 2000, which was denied on 5 March 2001. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained for the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), Policy Team, System Liaison and Procedures Office, which states that the $152.46 represents a balance of an initial total over payment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004160

    Original file (20110004160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110004160 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. It advised the applicant to apply to this Board for retroactive VDP and stated that the period for receipt of VDP should be from 13 June 2005, the date of entry into active duty, through 30 September 2009, the date before the new incentive program became effective. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005633

    Original file (20090005633.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that the zip code entered in item 19 (Nearest Relative) of his 1 August 1997 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 in support of his application.