Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105799C070208
Original file (2004105799C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           23 November 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2004105799


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Fred N. Eichorn               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Robert J. Osborn              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his debt be cancelled and he be paid the
pay that was due him at his separation.

2.  The applicant states that he was unknowingly overpaid basic allowance
for housing (BAH) and not made aware of the error until the day of his
discharge.  He was overpaid BAH in the amount of $3,103.46.  He also was
not paid the $320.17 that was held pending determination of this matter.

3.  The applicant provides a 7 September 2003 memorandum from his
commander; a sworn statement dated 11 September 2003; an enlistment
contract dated 20 December 2001; orders dated 5 January 2002; and a leave
and earnings statement (LES) for the period 1 through 26 August 2003.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the U. S.
Army Reserve (USAR) on 17 September 1991.  He was voluntarily ordered to
active duty in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status in February 1999.  He
reenlisted in the USAR on 20 December 2001 for 3 years.

2.  The applicant was assigned to the 21st General Hospital, St. Louis, MO
on orders dated 8 May 2002 with a reporting date of 3 September 2002.
Orders dated 17 July 2002 amended those orders to assign him to Detachment
2, 21st General Hospital, Poplar Bluff, MO with the same reporting date.

3.  Orders dated 31 July 2003 show the applicant was discharged from the
USAR on 26 August 2003 with a general discharge.  His LES for the period
ending      26 August 2003 shows he had a debt of $3,919.13 and pay due at
separation of $320.17.  His pay due was held as credit against his debt.
The indebtedness is not identified and may have included monies due for
something other than overpaid BAH.

4.  In his 7 September 2003 memorandum, the applicant's commander informed
the servicing finance office that, when the applicant was transferred to
the Poplar Bluff site for the unit, paperwork was not initiated to change
his zip code from St. Louis 63109 to Poplar Bluff 63901 due to an oversight
that was not the applicant's fault.

5.  Army Regulation 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness for
Enlisted Members), paragraph 1-8c states that indebtedness to the U. S.
Army will not be remitted or canceled if a soldier will receive less than
an honorable discharge at time of separation.

6.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 4837 states that, if he considers it in
the best interest of the United States, the Secretary may have remitted or
cancelled any part of an enlisted member's indebtedness to the United
States or any of its instrumentalities remaining unpaid before, or at the
time of, that member's honorable discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The statute would ordinarily prohibit the remission or cancellation of the
applicant's debt.  However, he was overpaid BAH through no fault of his
own.  It would be equitable to grant the relief requested.  The applicant's
records should be corrected to show his zip code was St. Louis 63109.

BOARD VOTE:

__fne___  __jtm___  __rjo___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends
that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected by showing that his zip code during the period of his assignment
to the 21st General Hospital was St. Louis 63109.

2.  After the above correction is made, the Defense Finance and Accounting
Service should audit his records to determine if he is entitled to payment
of the $320.17 that was due at his separation.




            __Fred N. Eichorn_____
                    CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004105799                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20041123                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |128.10                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003872

    Original file (20110003872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness for Enlisted Members) states Soldiers must make sure their financial accounts are correct. The fact that the applicant was not found guilty of stealing, falsifying documents, or committing other criminal activities to obtain the overpayments has no bearing on whether he was overpaid.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005296

    Original file (20080005296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states that without further information of deployment status of her gaining unit, the orders issuing authority at Fort Lee, advised her to include her son on her orders and that if he did not travel with her to Germany, his concurrent travel orders would be null and void after 60 days and she would have to apply for command sponsorship in order to take him to Germany. The applicant provides in support of her application, a Memorandum for Record from her commander, dated 27 December...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002348C070206

    Original file (20050002348C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the incorrect zip code used to determine the applicant's BAH entitlement was input into DFAS in February 2002. Notwithstanding the fact that the incorrect zip code for the applicant's BAH entitlement appeared on her monthly DFAS Military LES each month the evidence of record shows, and the applicant acknowledges, that she failed to initiate administrative action to correct the erroneous zip code for over two years; including a period of 14 months while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056961C070420

    Original file (2001056961C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected by refunding him a debt overpayment of $152.40. He received a second debt notice in September 2000, submitted a cancellation request on 31 October 2000, which was denied on 5 March 2001. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained for the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), Policy Team, System Liaison and Procedures Office, which states that the $152.46 represents a balance of an initial total over payment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051387C070420

    Original file (2001051387C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected by refunding him a debt overpayment of $152.40. He received a second debt notice in September 2000, submitted a cancellation request on 31 October 2000, which was denied on 5 March 2001. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained for the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), Policy Team, System Liaison and Procedures Office, which states that the $152.46 represents a balance of an initial total over payment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081704C070215

    Original file (2002081704C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Further, notwithstanding the applicant’s claim that she was not at fault for the debt, and it was the responsibility of her chain of command to review her monthly LES and inform her of the overpayment , there is no evidence to show that the applicant did not receive her monthly LESs during this period. Her monthly LESs clearly listed the zip code on which her BAH payment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016673

    Original file (20100016673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests remission or cancellation of his debt to the Government in the amount of $19,452.97. A review of the applicant’s official records shows that prior to being appointed as an aviator warrant officer, the applicant served as a personnel sergeant responsible for the daily administration and operation of a personnel administration center servicing over 523 Soldiers and civilians in matters related to finance and personnel actions as well as many other types of actions. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105346C070208

    Original file (2004105346C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a 10 September 2003 sworn statement a military pay technician for the United States Property and Fiscal Office (USPFO), North Dakota National Guard stated that information on the applicant, married to an active duty Air Force member, was erroneously loaded [in the finance system] in October 2002 at the BAH with dependents rate. The applicant, herself, however, did not so request in her application to this Board. As a result, the Board recommends that the record be corrected to show that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006393

    Original file (20130006393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. Her finance office told her she had been given dual OHA and the debt was to pay this money back because she was not authorized OHA or BHA for her husband in the states, only for her son who was there in Brussels with her. Effective 1 January 1998, in general, a member on active duty entitled to basic pay is authorized a housing allowance based on the member’s grade, dependency status, and location.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015772C071029

    Original file (20060015772C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his waiver of indebtedness packet; four leave and earnings statements (LESs); a USARC (U. S. Army Reserve Command) Form 22-R (Adjustment Certification Worksheet); a USAR Personnel/Pay Mismatch Report; a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 September 1984; discharge orders, dated 29 April 1986; an enlistment contract, dated 7 May 1987; a DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment); discharge...