Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000835
Original file (20080000835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  08 May 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080000835 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.




Director



Analyst

      The following members, a quorum, were present:


M

Chairperson

M

Member

M

Member
	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request that his 
DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that his rank and pay grade at the time of his release from active duty was specialist five (SP5)/E-5.

2.  The applicant essentially states that he submitted three documents with his original application which showed that his rank and pay grade at the time of his release from active duty was SP5/E-5, but his request was denied.  He also states, in effect, that he is providing additional information as requested by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), namely, orders promoting him from specialist four (SP4)/E-4 to SP5/E-5 on 22 June 1964, and a pay voucher that he received at the time of his release from active duty indicating that he was paid correctly as a SP5/E-5.  He further states, in effect, that although he initially indicated that there might be some monies involved, the proof that he was paid correctly as a SP5/E-5 shows that no money is involved in correcting his rank on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides orders, dated 22 June 1964, which promoted him from SP4/E-4 to SP5/E-5, his DA Form 2349 (Military Pay Voucher) for the period 1 to 31 July 1964, and the military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20060015437 on 1 May 2007 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Previously, it was determined that the evidence of record was contradictory, and that there were no orders promoting the applicant to SP5/E-5 or evidence from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service showing that the applicant was paid as a SP5/E-5.  However, the applicant provided Headquarters, 4th Armored Division Special Orders Number 150, dated 22 June 1964, which promoted him from SP4/E-4 to SP5/E-5 with a date of rank of 22 June 1964.  He also provided his DA Form 2349 for the period 1 to 31 July 1964, which, in 
item 3, shows that his pay grade was E-5.  Item 67 (Remarks) of this document also has an entry of "[Enlisted Member Promoted] to E-5 22 Jun 64."

2.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Based on the contradictory evidence in the applicant's previous case, it could not be conclusively established that his rank and pay grade at the time of his release from active duty was SP5/E-5.  However, the applicant has now provided, in the form of promotion orders and a military pay voucher, evidence which conclusively proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the applicant was promoted to SP5/E-5 with a date of rank of 22 June 1964, and that this was his rank at the time of his release from active duty.  Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his military records to show that his rank and pay grade at the time of his release from active duty was SP5/E-5.

BOARD VOTE:

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the ABCMR’s decision in Docket Number AR20060015437, dated 1 May 2007.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that his rank and pay grade at the time of his release from active duty was SP5/E-5, and that his date of rank to SP5/E-5 was 22 June 1964.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000835



3


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA  22202-4508




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015437C071029

    Original file (20060015437C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a DA Form 137 dated on or about 9 August 1964 which shows his rank as SP5, E-5. His rank was listed as SP4 on this form. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084239C070212

    Original file (2003084239C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214, 7 Military Pay Vouchers (DA Forms 2349), and an Allotment Authorization Form (DA Form 1341). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The Board notes the applicant’s request that his military records be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank of SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019236

    Original file (20130019236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, and Reductions) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he was promoted to SP5/E-5 (T) on 3 April 1964 and SP5/E-5 (P) on 3 April 1965. Army Regulation 624-200, effective 1 July 1962, section III, governed the temporary appointment of enlisted personnel of the active Army to pay grades E-4 through E-9 made against periodic temporary appointment quota allocations issued by Headquarters, Department of the Army. However, all evidence in his records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015721C071029

    Original file (20060015721C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Jeffrey C. Redmann | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to SP5 on 3 August 1971, shortly before his release from active duty, as evidenced by the promotion orders provided by the applicant, and the separation orders on file in his record. Although Items 5a, 5b and 5c of his DD Form 214 appear to be blank and his USAR discharge orders list his rank as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016262

    Original file (20110016262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 17 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110016262 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to show correction of his military records to show he had enrolled in the direct deposit program and to be paid any monies owed to him regardless of his missing payroll records and the 1940 Barring Act. Incorporated herein by reference are military records, which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010930

    Original file (20110010930.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It stated the active duty rank/grade at the time of separation will be entered in items 5a and 5b of the DD Form 214 being prepared. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank/grade as SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002222

    Original file (20140002222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A DD Form 1351-2, dated 9 January 1968, that shows his grade/rank as SP5/E-5. The available evidence is sufficient to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show he was promoted to and released from active duty in the rank of SP5/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009976

    Original file (20120009976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant did not provide any evidence. However, his records contain two DA Forms 24 (Service Record) and a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), as follows: a. DA Form 24 covering the period 10 September 1962 to 2 September 1965 shows in Section 1 - Appointments, Promotions or Reduction the following grades and effective dates: * private (PVT)/E-1, 10 September 1962 * private (PVT)/E-2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007376

    Original file (20080007376.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he served in Vietnam between 1969 and 1970. The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 May 1968. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was paid hostile fire pay for performing TDY in Vietnam between September 1969 and March 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010015

    Original file (20120010015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * letter of commendation, dated 1 July 1965 * endorsement to a letter of commendation, dated 12 August 1965 * photograph * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The letter of commendation lists his rank as SP5. Although there are some documents in his records that indicate his rank as SP5 (but his release from active duty orders are ambiguous, showing his rank as (“SP5/E4”), regrettably, without orders there is insufficient evidence to amend his DD Form 214 to...