Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000472
Original file (20080000472.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  29 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080000472 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  










      The following members, a quorum, were present:













	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be issued a DD Form 214 
(Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for his active duty service of 3 months (July 2006 to September 2006) under Aeroshield Airport Security and grant him back pay as well as the award that he rightfully earned.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that members of the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and Department of Defense (DOD) told him by law as an active Reservist he is entitled to a DD Form 214 for retirement points.  The assignment was a State emergency funded mission in California.  The mission was unfair and disorganized.  His pay was miscalculated and he was underpaid by at least $1,000.00 to $3,000.00 and his award was never completed. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 25 February 1999, a fax cover sheet, and a copy of a Casework Form, from a Member of Congress (MOC), in support of his request. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the California Army National Guard on 19 July 2002, for 7 years and 30 weeks, with prior service.  He was trained as a Dental Specialist, in military occupational specialty (MOS), 91E.  He was promoted to staff sergeant (SSG/E-6) on 16 November 2007.

2.  The applicant provided a copy of a Casework Form, from an MOC, Subject Military Complaint of DD Form 214, with Back Pay and Award.  He indicated that his home of record (HOR) was El Centro, California, for 16 years until 11 May 2007 when he relocated to San Diego, California, city of Logan Heights, on the date of his marriage.  He stated that he included this comment because he did not know if this was considered part of the 51st Congressional District.  He also stated “My temporary military duty station is here again in my old H.O.R. with the Southwest Border Mission.  This is why I am here.”

3.  An advisory opinion was provided by the Deputy Director, National Guard Affairs Office, US Army Human Resources Command (AHRC), dated 21 February 2008.  The opinion stated that the applicant performed Emergency State Active Duty for Operation Aeroshield (July 2006 through September 2006). He was not in a Federal status.  He was activated under the authority of the California Governor and the California Military Veterans Code (CMVC) Section 146.  The opinion stated that a DD Form 214 is only given to Soldiers that are activated in a Federal active duty status.  Therefore, the applicant did not qualify for a DD Form 214; but, he was awarded the State Ribbon for his service.

4.  The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for possible comment prior to consideration of this case.  The applicant was provided 20 days to submit matters in his behalf.  The applicant failed to respond within the time allotted. 

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part that a DD Form 214 will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from Active Duty.  A DD Form 214 will be prepared for members of the Army National Guard, in a Federal status, and the Army Reserve who completed 90 days or more of continuous active duty, full-time training duty, active duty support, completion of IADT which resulted in award of a military occupational specialty (MOS) or from a special duty training program tour.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The advisory opinion provided by AHRC indicated that the applicant performed Emergency State Active Duty for Operation Aeroshield, for 3 months, from July 2006 through September 2006, and he was not in a Federal status.  He was activated under the authority of the California Governor and CMVC Section 146.  He was awarded the State Ribbon for his service.  

2.  Army Regulation 635-5 requires the issuance of a DD Form 214 for members of the ARNG, in a Federal status.  Therefore, he is not entitled to be issued a DD Form 214 for the period of service from July 2006 to September 2006. 

3.  ARNG personnel called to active duty during a State of Emergency will be compensated by their State.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to any back pay or allowances by the Federal government.  

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________x____________
                CHAIRPERSON


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000472



4


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET, 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA  22202-4508




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004583

    Original file (20110004583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His MOC states that the applicant received the MSM for his actions which led to the saving of a civilian woman’s life, during what has become known as the “Great Blizzard of 1978.” The applicant along with two other RI Army National Guard (RIARNG) Soldiers was also awarded the Valley Forge Cross from the National Guard Association of the United States (NGAUS) for their actions during the emergency. Two memoranda from the Military Awards Branch, AHRC, dated 1 May 2008 and 25 June 2009 show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004721C070206

    Original file (20050004721C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he is currently employed as a civilian with the status of military technician (MT) [no longer employed as an MT effective 15 April 2006] for which he needs to maintain a Selective Reserve (SELRES) status or be retired involuntarily or medically. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 27 July 2001, the date of his transfer to the Retired Reserve. Chapter 7 of the regulation applies to the removal of Soldiers from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013662

    Original file (20070013662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provided no orders to show he was ordered to active duty in support of disaster relief efforts related to the Albany, Georgia, flood in 1994. The memorandum provided the Board by the Chief, Personnel Division, National Guard Bureau, was provided to the applicant for his information and possible rebuttal prior to consideration of his case for correction of military records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007820

    Original file (20140007820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In effect, his Delaware Army National Guard (DEARNG) unit was activated for about 9 months during the Wilmington Riot of 1968. The applicant's Army military service record shows as a member of the DEARNG he was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) and entered active duty on 24 October 1966. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003890

    Original file (20080003890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDA states that the applicant was placed on the TDRL on 10 May 2002, with a 30 percent disability rating. The PDA had no record that the applicant provided their agency with his new address, as required, so that he could be properly notified. It states that a Soldier on the TDRL must undergo a periodic medical examination and PEB evaluation at least once every 18 months to decide whether a change has occurred in the disability for which the Soldier was temporarily retired.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011664

    Original file (20140011664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he is authorized the National Defense Service Medal, the Afghanistan Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars, and the Iraq Campaign Medal. Therefore, although the Adjutant General of the State of Louisiana awarded him the Louisiana Emergency Service Medal it is not authorized to be entered on the DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019933

    Original file (20080019933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant was told that the records reviewed by the Department of the Army Selection Board did not indicate that she had completed the required civilian and/or military education by the day that the board convened (21 January 2004). The available evidence does not show the applicant ever requested a transfer to the Retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010700

    Original file (20060010700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records show the ARNG transferred the applicant to the IRR instead of discharging him. The branch manager also stated that based on the fact that the Soldier was never actually discharged and was transferred into the IRR instead, per Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 5-53, enlisted members may receive a medical waiver for enlistment provided they can show that their physical condition has improved to meet retention criteria. On 18 August 2006, the CAARNG issued the applicant a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018042

    Original file (20120018042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The report stated the applicant had been AWOL since 1500 on 12 December 2008. He stated he really didn't want to be in the Army any more. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120018042 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120018042 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004107083C070208

    Original file (2004107083C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Powers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he completed a tour of duty in the Republic of Korea in accordance with the guidelines established in AR (Army Regulation) 600-8-22 for award of the OSR. The applicant did not complete a 12-month overseas tour of duty in Korea.