Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018035
Original file (20070018035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  17 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070018035 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.




Director



Analyst
      The following members, a quorum, were present:




Chairperson



Member



Member
	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DA Form 3713, Data for Retired Pay, be corrected to show that his disability was the result of an instrumentality of war and incurred in line of duty.

2.  The applicant states that he was on a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) exercise involved in a field problem when he was struck by a military vehicle.

3.  The applicant provides a letter in support of his request and excerpts from his military records.  The letter is from an individual whose relationship to the applicant has not been established.  In that letter, the writer expands the applicant’s request to asking that his DD Form 214 also be corrected to reflect the proper amount of time he served both on active and on inactive duty.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 June 1974.  He was awarded the military occupational specialties of motor transport operator and light wheel vehicle mechanic and was promoted to pay grade E-6.

3.  On 14 September 1983, the applicant was sitting in a truck in the field when his truck was rear ended.  There is no evidence to show what type of truck the applicant was sitting in or what rear ended the applicant’s truck.

4.  On 27 August 1987, the applicant was considered by an informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), which determined that he was physically unfit and recommended that he be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), rated 40 percent disabled.  Item 10 of the Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings shows that the applicant’s retirement was not based on disability resulting from injury or disease received in line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war.  

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 24 March 1988 and was transferred to the TDRL the following day.

6.  On 8 August 1989, while the applicant was assigned to the TDRL, a PEB convened and determined that the applicant was physically unfit and recommended that he be discharged with severance pay, rated 10 percent disabled.  The applicant nonconcurred and demanded a formal hearing.

7.  On 12 April 1991, a formal PEB convened and determined that the applicant was physically unfit and recommended that he be placed on the Retired List, rated 100 percent disabled.  Item 10 of the Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings, which would have an entry if the applicant’s retirement was based on disability resulting from injury or disease received in line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war, had “Not applicable” entered.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 defines instrumentality of war as a device designed primarily for military service and intended for use in such service at the time of the occurrence of the injury.  It may also be a device not designed primarily for military service if use of or occurrence involving such a device subjects the individual to a hazard peculiar to military service.  This use or occurrence differs from the use or occurrence under similar circumstances in civilian pursuits.  There must be a direct causal relationship between the use of the instrumentality of war and the disability must be incurred incident to a hazard or risk of the service.

9.  Army Regulation 15-185, the regulation which governs the ABCMR, states that applicants usually are Soldiers or former Soldiers of the Active Army, the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), and in certain cases, the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and other military and civilian individuals affected by an Army military record.  Requests are personal to the applicant and relate to military records.  Requests are submitted on a DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record Under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552).  Soldiers need not submit applications through their chain of command.  An applicant with a proper interest may request correction of another person’s military records when that person is incapable of acting on his or her own behalf, missing, or deceased.  Depending on the circumstances, a child, spouse, parent, or other close relative, heir, or legal representative (such as a guardian or executor) of the Soldier or former Soldier may be able to demonstrate a proper interest.  Applicants must send proof of proper interest with the application when requesting correction of another person’s military records.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that his DA Form 3713, Data for Retired Pay, be corrected to show that his disability was the result of an instrumentality of war and incurred in line of duty.

2.  The records show that the applicant was in a parked truck when it was rear ended by something which is not identified in the applicant’s military records.

3.  The applicant’s PEB determined that the applicant’s disability was not the result of an instrumentality of war.  It is this determination which formed the basis for the entry on the applicant’s DA Form 3713, Data for Retired Pay, which the applicant requested to be corrected.

4.  The PEB’s determination appears to be proper and equitable.  There is no evidence or indication that the truck the applicant was a sitting in was designed primarily for military service.  However, even if it was, the truck was parked.  Therefore, the applicant’s sitting in the truck did not subject him to a hazard peculiar to military service.  The applicant would have been subjected to the same hazard under similar circumstances in civilian pursuits.

5.  As for the request to correct the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect the proper amount of time he served both on active and on inactive duty, the letter is from an individual whose relationship to the applicant has not been established.  As such, that individual is not a valid applicant and the request made by that individual cannot be considered by the ABCMR.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__JLP  __  __TSK__  __DWT__   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___        TSK                ___
                CHAIRPERSON


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070018035



5


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA  22202-4508




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013490

    Original file (20080013490.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Medical Evaluation Board (MEBD) be corrected to have it show that his conversion disorder was incurred in line of duty as a direct result of conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war, as defined by Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104. The PEB added that the applicant's retirement was not based on disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurring in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016212

    Original file (20130016212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states: * when a combat vehicle is involved in an accident during a combat mission, it is considered a combat-related accident and any injuries caused by the vehicle are also considered combat-related * a DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay) shows "Retired for disability caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in the line of duty during a period of war" and this statement automatically qualifies him for CRSC * he has been denied CRSC on 3 occasions and he could use the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03172

    Original file (BC-2006-03172.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB, after reviewing new evidence and applicant’s medical records, determined a hearing was not necessary, and recommended he be discharged with severance pay, with a 20% disability rating. This injury is, instead, a pre-existing condition “aggravated by extreme shock of pounding heavy [aircraft] wheel chocks.” Designating an injury such as the applicant’s as being the direct result of armed conflict exceeds the DODI’s unambiguous intent to limit this classification to those service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019835

    Original file (20090019835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * his discharge orders and DA Form 199 should be corrected to show his injury was caused by an instrumentality of war * his medical records clearly show his condition was caused from noise exposure from his occupation in the military * he worked on tanks and these vehicles are instruments of war 3. The applicant contends his military records clearly show his condition was caused by noise exposure from his occupation in the military (tank mechanic). The applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001806

    Original file (20120001806.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB proceedings also stated "The Soldier's retirement is based on disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war..." and "The disability did result from a combat related injury as defined in 26 U.S. Code 104." Department of Defense (DOD) guidance on CRSC states a combat-related disability is a disability with an assigned medical diagnosis code from the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities that was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084161C070212

    Original file (2003084161C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS : That the DD Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings (PEB) block 16 be corrected to show that his disability retirement was in the line of duty and caused as a direct result of armed conflict or an instrumentality of war. Both the applicant’s skin condition and hearing loss were considered to be in the line of duty but were not diagnosed until...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013542

    Original file (20110013542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to show: a. The accident was caused by an instrumentality of war and under conditions simulating war; however, the PEB Proceedings, dated 28 February 1991, failed to indicate such. This does not correspond to the PEB's recommended finding that the retirement is not based on disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a result of armed conflict or caused by an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016669

    Original file (20120016669.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) under Items 10a to 10c to show his right hip injury as a disability that was incurred in the line of duty (LOD) as a result of an instrumentality of war. The regulation states in: a. Paragraph 4-19(2)(b) states in block 10C the board will record its determination of whether the injury was combat-related as defined by Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104. b. Paragraph 4-19j that in making a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03664

    Original file (BC 2007 03664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03664 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability retirement be corrected to show that his medical condition was “the direct result of armed conflict or was caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in the line of duty during a period of war," or was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012834

    Original file (20090012834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. A 7-week post injury X-ray of the right toe revealed no evidence of healing of the fracture. Item 10 of the DA Form 199 PEB Proceedings shows the following entry: If retired because of disability, the Board makes the recommended finding that: a. "Hallux" refers to the big toe, while "rigidus" indicates that the toe is rigid and cannot move.