Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013490
Original file (20080013490.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  2 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013490 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Medical Evaluation Board (MEBD) be corrected to have it show that his conversion disorder was incurred in line of duty as a direct result of conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war, as defined by 
Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104.

2.  The applicant states that he was a passenger in a HMMWV which was rear-ended by a 2 1/2 ton truck.  Both were military vehicles and he was going to a field training exercise site.  His conversion disorder was a direct result of this accident.

3.  The applicant provides his MEBD, his Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), a chronological record of medical care, and orders removing him from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 
3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 November 1983, was awarded the military occupational specialty of power generation equipment repairer, and was promoted to pay grade E-6.

3.  On 11 January 1994, an MEBD convened and determined that the applicant had conversion disorder, single episode, manifested by non-intentional right-sided continuing tremor, pseudo seizures, and torticollis, with no organic etiology to explain the symptoms.  The MEBD also determined the applicant had status post three closed head injuries, once in 1985 when he walked into an air conditioning unit, once in 1992 when he was rear ended in a motor vehicle accident, and in June 1993 when he was rear ended by a 2 1/2 ton truck while a passenger in a HMMWV.  Other medical conditions noted by the MEBD were hepatitis C and patellofemoral pain syndrome, status post patellar fracture.  The MEBD referred the applicant to a PEB.

4.  On 29 August 1994, a PEB convened which determined that the applicant was physically unfit due to conversion disorder with right-sided tremor, pseudo seizures, torticollis, and major depression developing due to failure of the disorder to improve (30 percent disabled); and status post closed head injuries multiple, mild, and moderate cognitive dysfunction (10 percent disabled).  The PEB recommended that the applicant be placed on the TDRL rated 40 percent disabled.  The PEB added that the applicant's retirement was not based on disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurring in the line of duty during a period of war as defined by law, and the applicant's disability did not result from a combat-related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104.

5.  The applicant concurred with those findings and recommendation and waived a formal hearing of his case.

6.  Accordingly, on 27 October 1994, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and placed on the TDRL the following day.

7.  Conversion disorder is a condition in which a person has neurologic symptoms that cannot be explained.  Conversion disorder symptoms may occur because of emotional distress or psychological problems.  Symptoms usually begin suddenly after a stressful experience.  People are more at risk for a conversion disorder if they also have an underlying medical illness, a dissociative disorder, or personality disorder.  MEDLINE PLUS.gov

8.  Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-19j states that in making a determination whether a disability should be classified as being incurred during an armed conflict or due to an instrumentality of war, the following must be considered: 

	(1) The disability resulted from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict and which itself renders the Soldier unfit.  A disability may be considered a direct result of armed conflict if—

		(a) The disability was incurred while the Soldier was engaged in armed conflict, or in an operation or incident involving armed conflict or the likelihood of armed conflict; while the Soldier was interned as a prisoner of war or detained against his will in the custody of a hostile or belligerent force; or while the Soldier was escaping or attempting to escape from such prisoner of war or detained status.

		(b) A direct causal relationship exists between the armed conflict or the incident or operation, and the disability.

	(2) The disability is unfitting, was caused by an instrumentality of war, and was incurred in the line of duty during a period of war as defined by law.  

9.  Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104 states, in pertinent part, that for purposes of this subsection, the term “combat-related injury” means personal injury or sickness which is incurred as a direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in extra hazardous service, or under conditions simulating war; or which is caused by an instrumentality of war. 

10.  Army Regulation 635-40 defines instrumentality of war as a device designed primarily for military service and intended for use in such service at the time of the occurrence of the injury.  It may also be a device not designed primarily for military service if use of or occurrence involving such a device subjects the individual to a hazard peculiar to military service.  This use or occurrence differs from the use or occurrence under similar circumstances in civilian pursuits.  
There must be a direct causal relationship between the use of the instrumentality of war and the disability must be incurred incident to a hazard or risk of the service.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his conversion disorder should have been determined to have been caused by an instrumentality of war.

2.  In this regard, there is no evidence to show that the applicant's conversion disorder was caused by his HMMWV being hit by a 2 1/2 ton truck.  To the contrary, a conversion disorder is a condition in which a person has neurologic symptoms that cannot be explained.  Conversion disorder symptoms may occur because of emotional distress or psychological problems.  

3.  In addition, neither a HMMWV nor a 2 1/2 ton truck is designed primarily for military service.

4.  As such, there is no basis for correcting the applicant's records to show his conversion disorder was caused by an instrumentality of war.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013490



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013490



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009718

    Original file (20140009718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. his DA Form 199, item 10a, should be corrected to reflect "The Soldier's retirement is based on a disability received in the line of duty [LOD] as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war incurred in the LOD while simulating war"; and b. his request for reconsideration is based on incorrect information contained in the "Discussions and Conclusions" portion of the decisional document. His record contains a DA Form 2173 (Statement of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008243

    Original file (20140008243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his separation order to show his disability was based on an injury or disease received in the line of duty (LOD) as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war incurred in the LOD during a war period as defined by law during his service in Kosovo not Oklahoma. The DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings) contains the following entries in item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013542

    Original file (20110013542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to show: a. The accident was caused by an instrumentality of war and under conditions simulating war; however, the PEB Proceedings, dated 28 February 1991, failed to indicate such. This does not correspond to the PEB's recommended finding that the retirement is not based on disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a result of armed conflict or caused by an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016968

    Original file (20110016968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to show his retirement is based on a disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurring in the line of duty during a period of war as defined by law. He states: a. the Standard Forms (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 19 February and 29 April 2008, were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001806

    Original file (20120001806.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB proceedings also stated "The Soldier's retirement is based on disability from injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war..." and "The disability did result from a combat related injury as defined in 26 U.S. Code 104." Department of Defense (DOD) guidance on CRSC states a combat-related disability is a disability with an assigned medical diagnosis code from the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities that was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001878

    Original file (20130001878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 241-0001, dated 29 August 2005 * A DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) decision * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Orders 058-809 (Retired Reserve orders) * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) * DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. It does not mean...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001150

    Original file (20140001150.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), item 10 (If Retired Because of Disability, The Board Makes the Recommended Finding That:) to show his medical retirement is based on disability from an injury received in the line of duty (LOD) and was caused by an instrumentality of war. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013430

    Original file (20090013430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The profiling officer and approving authority stated that the applicant required a Medical Evaluation Board (MEBD)/Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). On 21 August 2008, the initial physician directed MEBD shows that after consideration of all clinical records, laboratory findings, and physical evaluations it found the following medical conditions/defects: cervical spine pain, low back pain, and bilateral planter fasciitis. The PEB determined that the applicant’s disabling conditions were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004657

    Original file (20130004657.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show: * all updates directed as a result of an approved recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) * all awards he is authorized * the appropriate entries on his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to indicate he was retired due to a combat-related disability incurred in the line of duty (LOD) 2. As a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to amend the DA Form 199 to reflect the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003422C070205

    Original file (20060003422C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was also found to be unfit for duty due to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and that this disability was a direct result of armed conflict and/or was caused by an instrumentality of war. The applicant states that he believes an error was made during his formal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) hearing in that his back injury and PTSD were not coded on the DA Form 199. The applicant’s back condition does not...