Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014773
Original file (20070014773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  26 February 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070014773 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


x

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that her entry level status uncharacterized discharge be upgraded.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that her discharge should be upgraded because it was uncharacterized.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service); her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); her DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile); and her medical documents. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Alabama Army National Guard on 13 October 1988.  She was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) on 27 October 1988.

3.  The applicant was released from IADT on 27 December 1988 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11 for failure to meet procurement medical fitness - no disability.  Her service was characterized as entry level status uncharacterized.  She had 2 months and 1 day of creditable active service.  On the following date, she was transferred back to her Army National Guard unit.  

4.  The applicant was discharged from Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army on 8 March 1989.

5.   Army Regulation 635-200 states that entry level status for Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve Soldiers begins upon enlistment in the Army National Guard or the U.S. Army Reserve.  The regulation states that entry
level status terminates, for Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, 180 days after beginning training.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard in October 1988.  She was ordered to IADT on 27 October 1988 and was released from active duty on 27 December 1988 with service uncharacterized.  She was discharged from the Alabama Army National Guard on 8 March 1989.

2.  The applicant was in an entry level status at the time of her separation from active duty because she had served fewer than 180 days of active Federal service.  The determination that the applicant’s service was uncharacterized was in compliance with Army regulation governing separations of Soldiers while in an entry level status.

3.  Therefore, the applicant's DD Form 214 properly reflects her character of service as uncharacterized.  

4.  She has failed to show through the evidence submitted with her application or the evidence of record that the actions taken in her case were in error or unjust.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

x______  x_____  x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



x________
          CHAIRPERSON


INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070014773
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20080226
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
UNCHAR
DATE OF DISCHARGE
19881227
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR635-200, paragraph 5-11
DISCHARGE REASON
Failure to meet procurement medical fitness
BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
Ms. Mitrano
ISSUES         1.
110.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018137

    Original file (20070018137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve on 9 April 1990. The regulation states that entry level status terminates, for Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, 180 days after beginning training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020911

    Original file (20110020911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she was promoted as follows: * PV1- 23 December 1988 * PV2- 22 August 1989 * PFC - no entry * SPC - 16 February 1990 7. With regard to the rank/grade of E-1 recorded on the applicants DD Form 214; she enlisted in the USAR as a PV1 on 23 December 1988 and was promoted to PV2 on 22 August 1989. Additionally, the characterization of service for USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT and are in entry level status is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008127

    Original file (20100008127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted [emphasis added]. (2) The evidence shows the applicant had not completed 90 days of active service after beginning Phase II (AIT). Records show the applicant was honorably...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013838

    Original file (20070013838.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Entry-level status for such a member of an RC terminates as follows: (1) 180 days after beginning training if the member is ordered to active duty for training (ADT) for one continuous period of 180 days or more; or (b) 90 days after the beginning of the second period of ADT if the member is ordered to ADT under a program that splits the training into two or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013838

    Original file (20070013838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070013838 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. She entered initial active duty training (IADT) on 14 October 1988 and was relieved from IADT on 4 March 1989 after completing 4 months and 21 days of active service. Department of Defense Directive 1332.14...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011605

    Original file (20130011605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It stated the service of Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and USAR Soldiers who successfully completed a period of initial active duty for training (IADT) who were in an entry-level status would be uncharacterized, even though they completed their IADT successfully. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she completed a total of 8 months and 22 days of active duty service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000459

    Original file (20120000459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her uncharacterized discharges of 1990 and 2002 to honorable discharges. A National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows she was released from the ARNG with uncharacterized service on 28 March 1990 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) for the remainder of her statutory obligation. c. An uncharacterized separation will be initiated when a Soldier is released from IADT...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021207

    Original file (20090021207.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states her character of service during the period of her active duty training (ADT) from 21 February through 24 June 1991 was categorized as uncharacterized. Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017465

    Original file (20120017465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. a. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000245

    Original file (20090000245.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 135-178 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Enlisted Administrative Separations) states that for the purposes of characterization of service, the Soldier’s status is determined by the date of notification as to the initiation of separation proceedings. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214 for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from the Active Army. The evidence of...