Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010289
Original file (20070010289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  20 December 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070010289 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Rene’ R. Parker 

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Richard Dunbar

Chairperson

Ms. Jeanette McCants

Member

Mr. Jerome Pionk

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the second award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states that he did not receive the second award of the DFC until after he had outprocessed.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, two DFC certificates, Permanent Orders for his first award of the DFC, and his Officer Record Brief.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 October 1986.  He was appointed as Reserve Warrant Officer of the Army on 28 February 1991.  The applicant was retired on 28 February 2007.

2.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign ribbons Awarded or Authorized” of the applicant’s DD Form 214 lists the award of the DFC.  

3.  U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (now Human Resources Command) (HRC) Permanent Orders Number 031-06 dated 31 January 2002 and certificate show that the applicant was awarded the DFC for extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight on 19 October 2001.  

4.  The applicant also provided a certificate dated 12 December 2006 that awarded him the DFC for heroism while participating in aerial flight in Afghanistan on 10 July 2006.  However, the applicant’s records did not contain orders to verify this award.

5.  On 5 December 2007 verification of the award of the DFC was obtained from the Awards Branch, HRC.  The Awards Branch verified that HRC issued the order that awarded the applicant the DFC dated 12 December 2006.  Since the award was classified, HRC could not provide a copy of the permanent orders authorizing the award.  However, the HRC official verified the applicant’s entitlement to the DFC (2nd Award)

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Distinguished Flying Cross is awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity with the Army of the United States, distinguished himself or herself by heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight.  The performance of the act of heroism must be evidenced by voluntary action above and beyond the call of duty.  The extraordinary achievement must have resulted in an accomplishment so exceptional and outstanding as to clearly set the individual apart from his or her comrades or from other persons in similar circumstances. Awards will be made only to recognize single acts of heroism or extraordinary achievement and will not be made in recognition of sustained operational activities against an armed enemy.  For each succeeding act or period of meritorious service or achievement that justifies the award of a decoration, an oak leaf cluster or numeral device will be awarded.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant’s certificate and HRC verification of the issuance of orders authoring the second award of the DFC is sufficient evidence to correct his records to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

__RD ___  ___JM __  __JP____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show the DFC (2nd Award).




_____Richard Dunbar_______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070010289
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20071220
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT 
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
107.00
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013182

    Original file (20060013182.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The regulation states that the Distinguished Flying Cross is awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity with the Army of the United States, distinguished himself or herself by heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. The evidence of record confirms the eighth digit of the applicant’s SSAN is 9 and not 4, as is currently listed in these orders, as evidenced by the SSAN entry on the applicant's DA Form 2-1, his DD Form 214, and on documents on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01247

    Original file (BC-2006-01247.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01247 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXX (DECEASED) COUNSEL: DR ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 OCT 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to show he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and awarded the Air Medal (AM) with five Oak Leaf Clusters...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021777

    Original file (20090021777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel also states the applicant and this warrant officer were both involved in the same action on the night of 6 November 1965. The DA Form 638 and statement submitted in support of award of the DFC for CW4 K _ _ _ _ _ stated as the A/C of a UH-1D Helicopter flying lead of a flight of three returning from an earlier day-long mission when they received an emergency radio call advising that a cavalry unit was under nearly overwhelming enemy fire. In a letter, dated 16 October 2009, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02052

    Original file (BC-2006-02052.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02052 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two additional oak leaf cluster to the Distinguished Flying Cross and an additional oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal. In 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2005-01522

    Original file (bc-2005-01522.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He should be awarded the DFC for his actions on 23 June 1952. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the AmnM is awarded for voluntary risk of life not involving actual combat and the applicant’s actions on 23 June 1952 were previously recognized in the AM he was awarded for numerous operational flights from 8 May 1953 to 23 June 1952. On 14 June 1952, he was awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055092C070420

    Original file (2001055092C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that an individual who has been incapacitated for further flight duty by reason of being wounded as a result of enemy action, or injured as the result of an aircraft accident for which he or she was not personally responsible, or has participated in at least 15 combat missions under probable exposure to enemy fire while serving in the principal duty of a crew chief, airborne electronic sensory system operator or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102436

    Original file (0102436.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The pilot of the 25 August 1972 mission recommends the applicant be awarded the DFC and states that during the mission the applicant played an extraordinary role in pre-planning, coordinating and ensuring the success of reconnaissance and air strikes. As such, they believe he received sufficient recognition for his achievement during aerial flight. Of the Airborne Interpreters who participated in the Rustic Operation, the applicant is one of only two individuals who did not receive at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004517

    Original file (20090004517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant served as a crew chief/gunner on one UH-1 during the operation and, despite being wounded, he continued with the mission, helping to return his aircraft to base. Given the awarding of Air Medals with “V” Devices to several other enlisted aircraft crewmembers for their actions on 24 March 1971, it would be just and equitable to award the applicant the same decoration. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01548

    Original file (BC-2007-01548.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01548 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 November 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two oak leaf clusters to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and three additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In view of the above,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01826

    Original file (BC-2008-01826.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits his personal statement, Congressional correspondence, recommendations from his former commander/Director of Combat Operations Fifth Air Force, narrative recommendations, proposed citations, a statement from his wingman on the 28 June 1952 mission, extracts from his personal copies of his military records to include flight records, mission reports, a copy of the only other DSC awarded in the wing, translated Russian mission reports for...