RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01247
INDEX CODE: 107.00
XXXXXX (DECEASED) COUNSEL: DR ASTON
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 OCT 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to show he was awarded the
Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and awarded the Air Medal (AM) with five
Oak Leaf Clusters (OLCs) and six OLCs.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her deceased husband should have been awarded these medals for completion
of 37 combat missions since the Eighth Air Force had an established policy
at that time of awarding a DFC upon the completion of a tour of combat duty
(25 missions) and an additional AM upon the completion of every five
missions. In view of his 37 combat missions, he should have received the
DFC for his completion of his first 25 missions, and two additional AMs for
his 26th through 37th missions.
Counsel cites several previous cases in which the Board awarded a DFC and
additional AMs for completion of a tour of combat duty based on the
established Eighth Air Force policy at the time. On 25 August 2005, the
Board granted a similar application from the member’s co-pilot and awarded
him a DFC and two additional AMs based on the policy. As such, the member
should receive similar relief.
In support of the appeal, counsel submits a copy of the member’s Report of
Separation, a Recommendation for Award of the DFC and OLCs five and six to
the AM, and a List of Missions Flown.
Counsel’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The member was a former Army Air Corps B-24, Liberator, pilot who served in
the European African Middle-Eastern Theatres of Operation from 29 June 1944
to 7 February 1945. He participated in the Rhineland, Northern France,
Normandy, and Ardennes campaigns. His report of separation reflects award
of the European African Middle-Eastern Service Medal with four Bronze
Stars, and the Air Medal, with 4OLCs.
The DFC was established by Congress on 2 July 1926 and is awarded for
heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight.
The performance of the act of heroism must be evidenced by voluntary action
above and beyond the call of duty. During World War II, the Eighth Air
Force had an established policy whereby a DFC was awarded upon the
completion of a tour of combat duty (25 heavy bomber missions) and an AM
was awarded upon the completion of every five heavy bomber missions.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part that,
although the required decoration recommendation was provided, it was not
submitted through the proper channels. On 14 August 1943, General Arnold
sent a memorandum to all theater commanders, which revised the policy for
award of the DFC. Under the revised policy, the DFC could be awarded for
acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while
participating in aerial flight. To justify an award of the DFC for
heroism, the heroism must be evidenced by voluntary action in the face of
great danger above and beyond the line of duty while participating in
aerial flight. To warrant the award for extraordinary achievement while
participating in aerial flight, the results accomplished must be so
exceptional and outstanding as to clearly set him apart from his comrades
who have not been so recognized.
The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 12 May
2006, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. In this respect, we note the member
completed a tour of 37 combat missions while assigned to the Eighth Air
Force as a B-24 pilot. We also note that during the contested period,
Eighth Air Force had an established policy whereby a DFC was awarded upon
the completion of a tour of combat duty, i.e., 25 heavy bomber missions,
and an AM was awarded upon the completion of every five combat missions.
In support of the appeal, the applicant has provided a recommendation from
the former squadron navigator. In view of this statement, and given the
total number of missions the member completed, we recommend his records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to FORMER MEMBER be corrected to show that:
a. On 2 November 1944, he was awarded the Air Medal, Fifth Oak
Leaf Cluster, for extraordinary achievement, while serving as a pilot on B-
24 airplanes on many bombardment missions over enemy occupied Continental
Europe.
b. On 30 November 1944, he was awarded the Air Medal, Sixth Oak
Leaf Cluster, for extraordinary achievement, while serving as a pilot on B-
24 airplanes on many bombardment missions over enemy occupied Continental
Europe.
c. On 31 December 1944, he was awarded the Distinguished Flying
Cross, for extraordinary achievement, while serving as a pilot on B-24
airplanes on many bombardment missions over enemy occupied Continental
Europe.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-20065-01247
in Executive Session on 16 August 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence concerning Docket Number BC-2006-01247 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Apr 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Former Member's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memo, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 5 May 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 May 06.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-01247
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that:
a. On 2 November 1944, he was awarded the Air Medal, Fifth Oak
Leaf Cluster, for extraordinary achievement, while serving as a pilot on B-
24 airplanes on many bombardment missions over enemy occupied Continental
Europe.
b. On 30 November 1944, he was awarded the Air Medal, Sixth Oak
Leaf Cluster, for extraordinary achievement, while serving as a pilot on B-
24 airplanes on many bombardment missions over enemy occupied Continental
Europe.
c. On 31 December 1944, he was awarded the Distinguished Flying
Cross for extraordinary achievement, while serving as a pilot on B-24
airplanes on many bombardment missions over enemy occupied Continental
Europe.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02179
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02179 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In addition, based on the Eighth Air Force policy...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00538
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00538 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded three additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03794
In BC-2004-02294, the AFBCMR awarded a DFC to an applicant who had also completed more than the required ten missions as a lead navigator and an additional oak leaf cluster for completion of a tour of 32 combat missions. AFPC/DPPPR states, in part, that although the applicant’s records indicate that he completed a total of 35 combat missions and he has submitted a DFC recommendation signed by his former commander, in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02052
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02052 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two additional oak leaf cluster to the Distinguished Flying Cross and an additional oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal. In 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00916
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00916 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and Fifth and Sixth Oak Leaf Clusters to the Air Medal (AM, 5 & 6 OLCs). In 2001, the AFBCMR awarded a DFC and additional AMs to an applicant who had...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00386
AFPC/DPPPR states, in part, that although the applicant’s records indicate that he completed a total of 35 combat missions and he has submitted a DFC recommendation signed by his former commander, in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM or DFC based solely on the number of combat missions completed, but rather for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. Applicant’s records do not indicate he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00357
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00357 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and an additional oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal (AM). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02299
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02299 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded an additional oak leaf cluster to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2004-00787
Under the revised policy, the DFC could be awarded for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel for applicant states, among other things, that the requested relief should be favorably considered based on the recommendation of the applicant’s former commanding officer and in view of the established...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073
The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...