RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01522
INDEX CODE: 107.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 November 2006
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. He be awarded the Airman’s Medal (AmnM).
2. He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should be awarded the AmnM for his actions on 13 June 1953. On that
date, at K-47 Air Base, South Korea, he put his own life in great jeopardy
when he ran in front of his burning F-80C aircraft despite the fact that
1,200 rounds of 50 caliber automatic feed ammunition would “cook-off” as
soon as the fire reached the nose of the aircraft. He did so in order to
move the fire fighting crew that were standing in front of the nose of his
aircraft out of harms way as they attempted to extinguish the fire
consuming his aircraft.
He should be awarded the DFC for his actions on 23 June 1952. On that
date, the wing commander turned the lead of the group to him after
experiencing radio trouble. He adjusted the initial attack point of the
heavily defended target, i.e., Suiho Dam power generating complex, to avoid
conflict with Navy aircraft involved in the mission and to conserve fuel
since the mission was at the maximum combat range for the 45 F-80s involved
in the mission. He then led the group on their dive bombing attack with
each aircraft releasing its full bomb load on one pass, as insufficient
fuel precluded a second pass. Despite intense automatic weapons and
tracking barrage fire his bombs hit squarely on target as did those of the
following aircraft. As a result, the raid severely curtailed electrical
output for much of North Korea. Further, the mission was his 101st and 11
of his West Point classmates that were assigned to the 8th Fighter Bomber
Wing were awarded the DFC for completion of 100 missions.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a statement from General Bennie
L. Davis, USAF (Retired), AmnM and DFC narrative recommendations,
statements from former member’s of the 36th Fighter Bomber Squadron who
flew on the 23 June 1952 mission, and a listing of his West Point
classmates who, as lieutenants, received the DFC while flying with the 8th
Fighter Bomber Wing.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Regular Air Force
on 2 June 1950. From 28 November 1951 to 16 July 1952, he was assigned to
the 36th Fighter Bomber Squadron, 8th Fighter Bomber Wing, South Korea, as
an F-80 Shooting Star pilot. An AF Form 11, Officer Military Record,
contained in his records indicates that he completed a total of 100 combat
missions, totaling 132 combat hours. On 7 May 1952, he was awarded the Air
Medal (AM) for meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight
during the period 15 March 1952 to 6 April 1952. On 30 May 1952, he was
awarded the AM, First Oak Leaf Cluster (AM, 1 OLC) for meritorious
achievement while participating in aerial flight during the period 7 April
1952 to 8 May 1952. On 13 July 1952, he was awarded the AM, 2 OLC for
meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight during the
period 8 May 1952 to 23 June 1952. He was progressively promoted to the
grade of colonel, effective and with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 October
1973. He retired in the grade of colonel on 1 August 1980.
The AmnM is awarded for heroism involving voluntary risk of life under
conditions other than those of actual combat against an armed enemy.
The DFC was established by Congress on 2 July 1926 and is awarded for
heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight.
The performance of the act of heroism must be evidenced by voluntary action
above and beyond the call of duty.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
the AmnM is awarded for voluntary risk of life not involving actual combat
and the applicant’s actions on 23 June 1952 were previously recognized in
the AM he was awarded for numerous operational flights from 8 May 1953 to
23 June 1952.
The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 June
2005 for review and response within 30 days. However, as of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. In this respect, we note the
Airman’s Medal (AmnM) is awarded for heroism involving voluntary risk of
life under conditions other than those of actual combat against an armed
enemy. After reviewing the documentation submitted with this application
and noting the incident did not involve actual combat against an armed
enemy, we believe the applicant’s heroic actions on 13 June 1952 meet the
criteria for the AmnM. On that date, the applicant emerged from his
burning F-80C aircraft after regaining consciousness only moments earlier
from a crash landing and ran in front of the burning aircraft to move the
fire fighting crew that were standing in front of the nose of the aircraft
out of harms way. He voluntarily did so without hesitation for his own
safety despite the fact that 1,200 rounds of 50 caliber automatic feed
ammunition would “cook-off” in the direction of the fire fighting crew as
soon as the fire reached the nose of the aircraft. The applicant also
requests award of the DFC for extraordinary achievement while participating
in aerial flight on 23 June 1952. On that date, the wing commander turned
the lead of the group over to him after experiencing radio trouble. The
applicant adjusted the initial attack point of the heavily defended target,
i.e., Suiho Dam power generating complex, to avoid conflict with Navy
aircraft involved in the mission and to conserve fuel since the mission was
at the maximum combat range for the 45 F-80s involved in the mission. As a
result of his extraordinary leadership, the raid was successful in heavily
crippling North Korean electrical power for the remainder of the war. In
view of this, we believe he should be awarded the DFC for extraordinary
achievement. The applicant states that as the squadron’s Awards and
Decorations Officer during the period in question, he felt it to be self-
serving and unprofessional to insure action was taken to recommend himself
for the AmnM and DFC, assuming his predecessor would do so. He also states
that during the ten remaining days of his combat tour he flew 10 additional
combat missions and had little time to follow-up on the actions taken by
the new squadron’s Awards and Decorations officer. In view of the above,
and noting the supporting statements from senior Air Force officials, we
believe the interest of justice can best be served by resolving this matter
in the applicant’s behalf. Therefore, we recommend his records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. On 14 June 1952, he was awarded the Airman’s Medal for heroism
involving voluntary risk of life at K-47 Air Base, South Korea, on 13 June
1952.
b. On 24 June 1952, he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross
for extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight on 23
June 1952.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-01522
in Executive Session on 7 December 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
Mr. Terry L. Scott, Member
Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Mar 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 2 Jun 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 10 Jun 05.
KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-01522
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, be corrected to show:
a. On 14 June 1952, he was awarded the Airman’s Medal for
heroism involving voluntary risk of life at K-47 Air Base, South Korea, on
13 June 1952.
b. On 24 June 1952, he was awarded the Distinguished Flying
Cross for extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight on
23 June 1952.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01826
In support of his request, the applicant submits his personal statement, Congressional correspondence, recommendations from his former commander/Director of Combat Operations Fifth Air Force, narrative recommendations, proposed citations, a statement from his wingman on the 28 June 1952 mission, extracts from his personal copies of his military records to include flight records, mission reports, a copy of the only other DSC awarded in the wing, translated Russian mission reports for...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01041
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial and states, in part, that although it appears the applicant may have a credible claim, without any verifiable documentation within his military records to indicate that he was formally recommended, or awarded the DFC for the events that occurred on 13 November 1952, they must recommend disapproval based on the guidelines of Section 526 of the Fiscal Year 1996 National Defense...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073
The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01991
NPRC records do not show he was awarded the Aerial Gunner Badge or the Aircrew Member Badge. However, he was awarded both since he completed training and served in a unit that completed combat missions. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. USAF/A3O-AIF recommends approval of the request for the Aircrew Member Badge.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Since he flew with the same aircrew for 28 missions and was on the 17 February 1945 mission for which the navigator of his aircrew was awarded the DFC through the correction of record process, he should be awarded the DFC. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that in his opinion all ten aircrew members exhibited heroic and...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04104
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04104 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late father’s records be corrected to reflect award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). Although the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) Awards and Decorations Board could not process the...
The pilot of the 1 December 1971 mission recommends the applicant be awarded the DFC, 1 OLC, and states that due to the applicant’s quick and accurate interpretation of the Cambodian Ground Commander’s requests during the mission, they were able to place seven separate sets of fighters in and around Kampong Thma as close as 100 meters of the friendly forces, preventing the overrun of the city and saving the lives of many friendly Cambodian troops. Applicant’s complete submission, with...
The pilot of the 25 August 1972 mission recommends the applicant be awarded the DFC and states that during the mission the applicant played an extraordinary role in pre-planning, coordinating and ensuring the success of reconnaissance and air strikes. As such, they believe he received sufficient recognition for his achievement during aerial flight. Of the Airborne Interpreters who participated in the Rustic Operation, the applicant is one of only two individuals who did not receive at...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02450
Although the applicant’s reconstructed records do not contain a copy of a special order or recommendation for the DFC, the Board feels that the events which precipitated the CITATION OF OFFICER document furnished by the applicant rise to the level necessary for award of the DFC for heroism. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) for heroism while participating in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01538
Therefore, the following information has been extracted from the documentation provided by applicant. Regardless, although the Eighth Air Force had an established policy from 1942 to 1944, whereby a DFC was awarded upon the completion of 25 heavy bomber missions, in 1944, the total number of missions for award of a DFC was increased from 25 to 35. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-01538 in...