Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2005-01522
Original file (bc-2005-01522.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-01522
                                             INDEX CODE:  107.00
      XXXXXXX                           COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX                           HEARING DESIRED:  YES


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  9 November 2006


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.    He be awarded the Airman’s Medal (AmnM).

2.    He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should be awarded the AmnM for his actions on  13  June  1953.   On  that
date, at K-47 Air Base, South Korea, he put his own life in  great  jeopardy
when he ran in front of his burning F-80C aircraft  despite  the  fact  that
1,200 rounds of 50 caliber automatic feed  ammunition  would  “cook-off”  as
soon as the fire reached the nose of the aircraft.  He did so  in  order  to
move the fire fighting crew that were standing in front of the nose  of  his
aircraft out  of  harms  way  as  they  attempted  to  extinguish  the  fire
consuming his aircraft.

He should be awarded the DFC for his actions  on  23  June  1952.   On  that
date, the wing  commander  turned  the  lead  of  the  group  to  him  after
experiencing radio trouble.  He adjusted the initial  attack  point  of  the
heavily defended target, i.e., Suiho Dam power generating complex, to  avoid
conflict with Navy aircraft involved in the mission  and  to  conserve  fuel
since the mission was at the maximum combat range for the 45 F-80s  involved
in the mission.  He then led the group on their  dive  bombing  attack  with
each aircraft releasing its full bomb load  on  one  pass,  as  insufficient
fuel precluded  a  second  pass.   Despite  intense  automatic  weapons  and
tracking barrage fire his bombs hit squarely on target as did those  of  the
following aircraft.  As a result, the  raid  severely  curtailed  electrical
output for much of North Korea.  Further, the mission was his 101st  and  11
of his West Point classmates that were assigned to the  8th  Fighter  Bomber
Wing were awarded the DFC for completion of 100 missions.

In support of the appeal, applicant submits a statement from General  Bennie
L.  Davis,  USAF  (Retired),  AmnM  and   DFC   narrative   recommendations,
statements from former member’s of the  36th  Fighter  Bomber  Squadron  who
flew on the  23  June  1952  mission,  and  a  listing  of  his  West  Point
classmates who, as lieutenants, received the DFC while flying with  the  8th
Fighter Bomber Wing.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Regular  Air  Force
on 2 June 1950.  From 28 November 1951 to 16 July 1952, he was  assigned  to
the 36th Fighter Bomber Squadron, 8th Fighter Bomber Wing, South  Korea,  as
an F-80 Shooting Star pilot.   An  AF  Form  11,  Officer  Military  Record,
contained in his records indicates that he completed a total of  100  combat
missions, totaling 132 combat hours.  On 7 May 1952, he was awarded the  Air
Medal (AM) for meritorious achievement while participating in aerial  flight
during the period 15 March 1952 to 6 April 1952.  On 30  May  1952,  he  was
awarded the  AM,  First  Oak  Leaf  Cluster  (AM,  1  OLC)  for  meritorious
achievement while participating in aerial flight during the period  7  April
1952 to 8 May 1952.  On 13 July 1952, he was  awarded  the  AM,  2  OLC  for
meritorious achievement while participating  in  aerial  flight  during  the
period 8 May 1952 to 23 June 1952.  He was  progressively  promoted  to  the
grade of colonel, effective and with a  date  of  rank  (DOR)  of  1 October
1973.  He retired in the grade of colonel on 1 August 1980.

The AmnM is awarded for heroism  involving  voluntary  risk  of  life  under
conditions other than those of actual combat against an armed enemy.

The DFC was established by Congress  on  2 July  1926  and  is  awarded  for
heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in  aerial  flight.
The performance of the act of heroism must be evidenced by voluntary  action
above and beyond the call of duty.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states,  in  part,  that
the AmnM is awarded for voluntary risk of life not involving  actual  combat
and the applicant’s actions on 23 June 1952 were  previously  recognized  in
the AM he was awarded for numerous operational flights from 8  May  1953  to
23 June 1952.

The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10  June
2005 for review and response within 30 days.  However, as of this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of probable error or injustice.  In  this  respect,  we  note  the
Airman’s Medal (AmnM) is awarded for heroism  involving  voluntary  risk  of
life under conditions other than those of actual  combat  against  an  armed
enemy.  After reviewing the documentation submitted  with  this  application
and noting the incident did not  involve  actual  combat  against  an  armed
enemy, we believe the applicant’s heroic actions on 13 June  1952  meet  the
criteria for the AmnM.   On  that  date,  the  applicant  emerged  from  his
burning F-80C aircraft after regaining consciousness  only  moments  earlier
from a crash landing and ran in front of the burning aircraft  to  move  the
fire fighting crew that were standing in front of the nose of  the  aircraft
out of harms way.  He voluntarily did so  without  hesitation  for  his  own
safety despite the fact that 1,200  rounds  of  50  caliber  automatic  feed
ammunition would “cook-off” in the direction of the fire  fighting  crew  as
soon as the fire reached the nose  of  the  aircraft.   The  applicant  also
requests award of the DFC for extraordinary achievement while  participating
in aerial flight on 23 June 1952.  On that date, the wing  commander  turned
the lead of the group over to him after  experiencing  radio  trouble.   The
applicant adjusted the initial attack point of the heavily defended  target,
i.e., Suiho Dam power  generating  complex,  to  avoid  conflict  with  Navy
aircraft involved in the mission and to conserve fuel since the mission  was
at the maximum combat range for the 45 F-80s involved in the mission.  As  a
result of his extraordinary leadership, the raid was successful  in  heavily
crippling North Korean electrical power for the remainder of  the  war.   In
view of this, we believe he should be  awarded  the  DFC  for  extraordinary
achievement.  The  applicant  states  that  as  the  squadron’s  Awards  and
Decorations Officer during the period in question, he felt it  to  be  self-
serving and unprofessional to insure action was taken to  recommend  himself
for the AmnM and DFC, assuming his predecessor would do so.  He also  states
that during the ten remaining days of his combat tour he flew 10  additional
combat missions and had little time to follow-up on  the  actions  taken  by
the new squadron’s Awards and Decorations officer.  In view  of  the  above,
and noting the supporting statements from senior  Air  Force  officials,  we
believe the interest of justice can best be served by resolving this  matter
in  the  applicant’s  behalf.   Therefore,  we  recommend  his  records   be
corrected to the extent indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:

      a.    On 14 June 1952, he was awarded the Airman’s Medal  for  heroism
involving voluntary risk of life at K-47 Air Base, South Korea, on  13  June
1952.

      b.    On 24 June 1952, he was awarded the Distinguished  Flying  Cross
for extraordinary achievement while participating in  aerial  flight  on  23
June 1952.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2005-01522
in Executive Session on 7 December 2005, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                       Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
                       Mr. Terry L. Scott, Member
                       Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 Mar 05, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 2 Jun 05.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 10 Jun 05.




                                  KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
                                  Panel Chair

AFBCMR BC-2005-01522




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, be corrected to show:

            a.   On 14 June 1952, he was awarded the Airman’s Medal for
heroism involving voluntary risk of life at K-47 Air Base, South Korea, on
13 June 1952.

            b.   On 24 June 1952, he was awarded the Distinguished Flying
Cross for extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight on
23 June 1952.









JOE G. LINEBERGER

Director

Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01826

    Original file (BC-2008-01826.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits his personal statement, Congressional correspondence, recommendations from his former commander/Director of Combat Operations Fifth Air Force, narrative recommendations, proposed citations, a statement from his wingman on the 28 June 1952 mission, extracts from his personal copies of his military records to include flight records, mission reports, a copy of the only other DSC awarded in the wing, translated Russian mission reports for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01041

    Original file (BC-2009-01041.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial and states, in part, that although it appears the applicant may have a credible claim, without any verifiable documentation within his military records to indicate that he was formally recommended, or awarded the DFC for the events that occurred on 13 November 1952, they must recommend disapproval based on the guidelines of Section 526 of the Fiscal Year 1996 National Defense...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073

    Original file (BC-2005-02073.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01991

    Original file (BC 2013 01991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    NPRC records do not show he was awarded the Aerial Gunner Badge or the Aircrew Member Badge. However, he was awarded both since he completed training and served in a unit that completed combat missions. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. USAF/A3O-AIF recommends approval of the request for the Aircrew Member Badge.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900902

    Original file (9900902.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Since he flew with the same aircrew for 28 missions and was on the 17 February 1945 mission for which the navigator of his aircrew was awarded the DFC through the correction of record process, he should be awarded the DFC. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that in his opinion all ten aircrew members exhibited heroic and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04104

    Original file (BC-2008-04104.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04104 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late father’s records be corrected to reflect award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). Although the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) Awards and Decorations Board could not process the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102437

    Original file (0102437.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The pilot of the 1 December 1971 mission recommends the applicant be awarded the DFC, 1 OLC, and states that due to the applicant’s quick and accurate interpretation of the Cambodian Ground Commander’s requests during the mission, they were able to place seven separate sets of fighters in and around Kampong Thma as close as 100 meters of the friendly forces, preventing the overrun of the city and saving the lives of many friendly Cambodian troops. Applicant’s complete submission, with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102436

    Original file (0102436.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The pilot of the 25 August 1972 mission recommends the applicant be awarded the DFC and states that during the mission the applicant played an extraordinary role in pre-planning, coordinating and ensuring the success of reconnaissance and air strikes. As such, they believe he received sufficient recognition for his achievement during aerial flight. Of the Airborne Interpreters who participated in the Rustic Operation, the applicant is one of only two individuals who did not receive at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02450

    Original file (BC-2008-02450.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant’s reconstructed records do not contain a copy of a special order or recommendation for the DFC, the Board feels that the events which precipitated the CITATION OF OFFICER document furnished by the applicant rise to the level necessary for award of the DFC for heroism. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) for heroism while participating in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01538

    Original file (BC-2004-01538.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the following information has been extracted from the documentation provided by applicant. Regardless, although the Eighth Air Force had an established policy from 1942 to 1944, whereby a DFC was awarded upon the completion of 25 heavy bomber missions, in 1944, the total number of missions for award of a DFC was increased from 25 to 35. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-01538 in...