Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009093
Original file (20070009093.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	
				


	BOARD DATE:	  15 November 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070009093 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Margaret K. Patterson

Chairperson

Mr. Larry C. Bergquist

Member

Mr. Dale E. DeBruler

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her last name in Item 1 (Name) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "M****w" instead of "F****r."

2.  The applicant states that her last name was changed due to divorce. 

3.  The applicant provided a copy of her DD Form 214, Retired Identification Card, Texas Drivers License, Social Security Card, Department of Veterans Affairs Card, Marriage License, Final Decree of Divorce, Enlisted Evaluation Report, Army Achievement Medal Certificate, and Certificate of Court Reporting Course completion in support of her application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show that she enlisted in the Regular Army under her last name "M****w" on 3 July 1975 for a period of 3 years.  She later had a series of extensions and/or reenlistments, all under this same last name.

3.  The applicant's records further show that on 26 February 1981 she was married and requested her last name be changed from "M****w" to "F****r".  She further reenlisted in the Regular Army under her new last name.

4.  On 29 August 1996, the applicant was divorced. 

5.  The applicant was honorably retired by reason of permanent disability on
6 September 1996.  The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time of her retirement shows her last name as "F****r" and she authenticated the form using the signature "F****r".
6.  There is no indication in the applicant's records and she has not provided any evidence to show that she requested a name change upon her divorce.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) prescribes the policies governing the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records.  Chapter 2 of this regulation states an OMPF is initiated when the Soldier becomes a member of any Army Component.  It further states that once a document is placed in the Official Military Personnel File it becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from that file or moved to another part of the file.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  In establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that her military records be corrected to show her last name as "M****w" instead of "F****r."

2.  Evidence of record shows she enlisted and served under the name "M****w" during the period 3 July 1975 (initial enlistment) through 26 February 1981 (date of marriage).  Evidence of record further shows that she served under the name "F****r" during the period 26 February 1981 (date of marriage) through 6 September 1996 (date of discharge).  Therefore, the Army records are consistent with the applicant's name at that time.

3.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records for historical purposes.  The information in those records must reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of compelling information to the contrary, there is no basis for changing the records in this case.  

4.  A copy of this decisional document, along with her application will be filed in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding the different names and adequately document her last name in her record. 
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__mkp___  __lcb___  __ded___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



						Margaret K. Patterson
______________________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070009093
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20071115
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
100.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003160

    Original file (20150003160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. her DD Form 214 list the wrong name and should be corrected to reflect the name she signed on the bottom of her DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record), as P____ T____ B____; b. at the time of her discharge from the Army, she was divorced and returned to her maiden name; and c. her DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile Board Proceedings) also lists the incorrect name. The applicant provides copies of her: * Driver’s License * DD Form 214 * DA Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021483

    Original file (20140021483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and other official records to show her last name as G_____ vice A_____. This document stated, "Your military records have been corrected to show the change you requested. She was remarried after her retirement and her DD Form 214 was prepared as a record of her service at the time of retirement from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016631

    Original file (20080016631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The military documents that are on file in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File show that the applicant served under the surname G - - - s up until her release from active duty in 1999. The evidence shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR and entered on active duty in 1980 and 1988, respectively, under the surname of Y - - - g. In reviewing the available record, it appears the applicant was subsequently married and began using the surname of Y - - - g-O - - - s. In October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001023

    Original file (20150001023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of all her military records to show her last name as "M___-K_____." The applicant states she recently got married and wants her military records changed to show her new last name. The available evidence shows the applicant enlisted using the last name of "M___" and changed her last name to "S____" while serving on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022779

    Original file (20110022779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's military records to show her as his spouse with eligibility to receive a Reserve Components Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity and any other benefits offered to a fallen Soldier's widow. However, there is no evidence in his military records showing he ever made an RCSBP election. Furthermore, the FSM was divorced in 1997, and there is no evidence showing the FSM updated his military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008744

    Original file (20080008744.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When naming more than four principal or contingent beneficiaries, the additional beneficiaries are listed on the Beneficiary Continuation Form. The evidence of record shows that the FSM filed for divorce from the applicant and that the Court granted the FSM a judgment dissolving the marriage that existed between the applicant and the FSM, on 23 October 1995. With respect to the applicant's claim to SGLI, there is no evidence in the reconstructed record and the applicant did not provide any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019750

    Original file (20130019750.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states her military records show her last name as "R-----." Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the active Army. The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect her correct last name throughout the course of her military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004090

    Original file (20130004090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The applicant contends her DD Form 214 should be corrected by: a. changing the narrative reason for separation to show her disability was not EPTS and b. changing her name as a result of her divorce and remarriage that occurred subsequent to her discharge from military service. The available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025925

    Original file (20100025925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her married name. The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect her maiden name and the approved official name changes that she requested throughout her military service. Records also show that, from that point on, her last name (i.e., "J-----n") is consistently recorded in her official military service records, including her DD Form 214, when she retired from active duty on 30 September 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013098

    Original file (20100013098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant served under the same last name of B---------d from 24 February 1976 when her last name changed by reason of marriage, through 1 April 1987 when she divorced and elected not to change her last name, until she retired from active duty on 30 April 1997 under the same last name. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with her application and the supporting evidence she provided, which confirms her current full name,...