Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013098
Original file (20100013098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013098 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
 
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her last name as B-----z instead of 
B---------d.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that she divorced in 1987 but had children from that marriage who are now grown, she has remarried, and she now requests a legal name change.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 for the period ending
30 April 1997; a copy of her Decree for Dissolution of Marriage, adjudged on
1 April 1987; and a copy of a Petition for a Name Change, dated 7 July 2000.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 

has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 20 February 1973 under the name of R----a M---e B-----z.

3.  Special Orders Number 36, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Japan, dated 24 February 1976 changed the applicant's name on her official military records from R----a M---e B-----z to R----a M---e F------a B-----z B---------d by reason of marriage.

4.  The applicant continued to serve on active duty until she was honorably discharged on 12 April 1984.  She subsequently enlisted under the same married name in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 13 April 1984 for a period of 6 years.

5.  On 23 December 1986, the applicant submitted a copy of a Superior Court of Washington, County of Pierce, Decree for Dissolution of Marriage, which shows she divorced on 23 December 1986 and elected to keep her name as R----a
M---e F------a B-----z B---------d.

6.  On 13 February 1989, the applicant was discharged from the USAR and she again enlisted in the RA under the same name on 14 February 1989 for a period of 4 years.  She subsequently reenlisted on 9 June 1992 for a period of 4 years and extended her enlistment on 4 December 1995 for a period of 10 months under the same name.

7.  On 30 April 1997, the applicant retired from active duty by reason of sufficient service for retirement.  She completed 20 years and 29 days of active service.  Item 1 (Name) of her DD Form 214 shows her name as R----- M---e B---------d.

8.  The applicant petitioned the Court to change her name.  On 7 July 2000, the Superior Court of Arizona, County of Pima, changed her name from R----a M---e F------a B-----z B---------d to R----a M---e B-----z.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant served under the same last name of B---------d from 24 February 1976 when her last name changed by reason of marriage, through 1 April 1987 when she divorced and elected not to change her last name, until she retired from active duty on 30 April 1997 under the same last name.  All documents in her official records show her last name as B--------d.  Accordingly, her final DD Form 214 shows the correct last name.

2.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to now record her current full name in her military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records at this late date.

3.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with her application and the supporting evidence she provided, which confirms her current full name, will be filed in her Official Military Personnel File.  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the full name recorded in her military record and to satisfy her desire to have her current full name.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013098



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008085

    Original file (20130008085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse coverage. DFAS records show the applicant currently has SBP spouse coverage. Since the applicant's retired pay account reflects spouse SBP coverage, Rosario H------- is the lawful beneficiary of his SBP, unless they are divorced.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011503

    Original file (20140011503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show she is the eligible beneficiary to receive a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity as a former spouse. Although the applicant's DOB is shown in the SBP section of the FSM's Retiree Account Statement, there is no evidence of record that shows the FSM changed his SBP category from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage. There is also no evidence that the applicant notified DFAS in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005513

    Original file (20140005513.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage because he is now divorced and his divorce decree from his first spouse requires him to make her the beneficiary for his SBP. The available evidence shows the applicant's divorce decree, dated 21 August 1997, required him to make his first former spouse the beneficiary of his SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019895

    Original file (20140019895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005993

    Original file (20080005993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The military documents that are on file in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File show that the applicant served under the last name of J****** until sometime in 1984 and then served under the name of W******* up until her release from active duty in 1985. There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, which would indicate that an injustice will occur if her last name is not changed on her DD Form 214 as requested. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006682

    Original file (20140006682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a: * self-authored statement * statement from her former spouse * DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage), dated 24 March 2014 * letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC) * Separation Agreement * Settlement Agreement * Divorce Decree CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In support of her application, the applicant provides the following documents: a. DD Form 2656-1, dated 24 March 2014, that shows the applicant indicated she was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022434

    Original file (20120022434.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a Certificate of Death showing the FSM died on 20 December 2009 and was married to her at the time. A DFAS, Retired and Annuity Pay, letter dated 31 January 2013 addressed to the FSM's former spouse, stated that with regard to her recent correspondence to DFAS regarding the retired pay account of the FSM and SBP coverage, the following was provided: (1) Former spouse SBP coverage is not automatically granted based on being awarded in a divorce decree; a formal request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005810

    Original file (20140005810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage and that she be granted an SBP annuity. The applicant states, in effect, that at the time of their divorce the divorce decree provided that she remain the beneficiary of the FSM’s SBP annuity. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008412

    Original file (20140008412.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, correction of the FSM's records to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and changed his election from spouse to former spouse so that she may be entitled to an annuity. She provides: * Addendum to DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) * Applicant's self-authored statement * Amended Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage Order, dated 25 April 2006 with Separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013769

    Original file (20060013769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM failed to comply with the court order to maintain the SBP coverage on the applicant as his "Former Spouse," and the applicant failed to request a deemed election be made within one year of the divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Given the SBP coverage election was a matter of...