RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 20 November 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070007744
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano | |Director |
| |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Eric N. Andersen | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Donald L. Lewy | |Member |
| |Ms. Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD
Form 214) be corrected to show his permanent disability retirement vice
temporary disability retirement.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he was retired by reason of
temporary disability on 20 August 1991. He claims that on 13 April 1994,
he was retired by reason of permanent disability and he now requests that
his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect this permanent disability
retirement.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a Certificate of Retirement
in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an
applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations
if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided
in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is
granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the
applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are
insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and
entered active duty on 31 May 1983. He was trained in, awarded and served
in military occupational specialty (MOS) 13B (Cannon Crewmember), and
sergeant (SGT) is the highest rank he attained while serving on active
duty.
3. On 27 June 1991, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) convened at Walter
Reed Medical Center (WRMC) to consider the applicant's case. The PEB found
the applicant was physically unfit for further service due to a partial
complex seizure disorder with a recommended disability rating of 40
percent, and recommended his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired
List (TDRL).
4. On 27 June 1991, the PEB findings and recommendations were approved by
the proper authority on behalf of the Secretary of the Army.
5. On 30 August 1991, the applicant was honorably retired under the
provisions of Paragraph 4-24e, Army Regulation 635-40, by reason of
physical disability-temporary; and on 31 August 1991, he was placed on the
TDRL in the rank of SGT.
6. On 31 March 1994, a PEB convened at Fort Lewis, Washington to
reconsider the applicant's case. The PEB found the applicant was unfit for
further service due to a partial complex seizure disorder with a
recommended disability rating of 40 percent, and recommended the applicant
be permanently retired.
7. On 5 April 1994, the PEB findings and recommendations were approved by
the proper authority on behalf of the Secretary of the Army.
8. Department of the Army United States Total Army Personnel Command
(PERSCOM) Orders Number D69-12 directed the applicant be removed from the
TDRL on 12 April 1994, by reason of permanent disability, and that he be
placed on the Retired List the following day.
9. The applicant provides a retirement certificate that shows he was
retired from the United States Army on 13 April 1994.
10. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation
documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge,
release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. It also
establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form
214. Paragraph 2-1 contains guidance on preparing a DD Form 214. It
states, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's
most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-
cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty,
retirement, or discharge. There are no provisions for revising a DD Form
214 based on actions that take place subsequent to separation from active
duty. The instructions for the entry in Item 28 (Narrative Reason for
Separation) state that this entry is based on the regulatory or other
authority for separation.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that the narrative reason for separation
entered on his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his disability
retirement as permanent versus temporary was carefully considered.
However, by regulation the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most
recent period of active duty service, and there are no provisions for
revising the DD Form 214 based on actions that take place subsequent to a
member's separation from active duty.
2. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was honorably
separated from active duty on 20 August 1991, under the provisions of
Paragraph 4-24e, Army Regulation 635-40, by reason of disability-temporary,
and that he was placed on the TDRL the following day. Therefore, the Item
28 entry on the
DD Form 214 he was issued at the time correctly shows the narrative reason
for his separation as disability-temporary. His subsequent permanent
disability retirement is properly documented in official orders issued by
PERSCOM, and by the retirement certificate he was provided. As a result,
there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the
requested relief.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___ENA _ __DLL __ __RMN __ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
_____Eric N. Andersen ___
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20070007744 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |2007/11/20 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |HD |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |1991/08/30 |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR 635-40 |
|DISCHARGE REASON |Disability Temporary |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Ms. Mitrano |
|ISSUES 1. 1021 |100.0000 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01909
The seizure condition, characterized as “PCS (partial complex seizures) with secondary generalization,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501 with no other conditions submitted by the MEB.ThePEB adjudicated “partial complex seizure disorder with secondary generalization,” rated 40%,citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and placed the CI on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) effective on 13 December 1998 to allow the...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00712
The medical record documents three major seizures in the first year of diagnosis, in November 2002, March 2003, and July 2003. VA treatment report on 20 November 2008, also stated last the major seizure was March 2008. The FPEB noted that the CI had another seizure in March 2008.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106310C070208
If, at the time of that determination, the physical disability for which the member's name was carried on the TDRL still exists, it shall be considered to be of a permanent nature and stable. Therefore, it would be equitable to correct his records to show he was removed from the TDRL and permanently retired by reason of physical disability effective 28 May 1998 with a 40 percent disability rating. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001905C070206
The Navy MEB recommended that the applicant's case be referred to a physical evaluation board (PEB) for disposition. The PEB recommended that the applicant’s name be removed from the TDRL. He was removed from the TDRL because of permanent physical disability and was issued an RE Code of "4".
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008736
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was rated with a higher percentage of disability and placed on the permanent disability retired list. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably retired on 30 August 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24e(2), based on physical disability: temporary. The evidence of record also shows that, based on a periodic physical examination, a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007758
USAR Personnel Center Orders D78-17, dated 23 April 1991, retired the applicant effective 14 May 1991 and placed him on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a 100-percent disability evaluation. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army. The ABCMR will decide cases based on the evidence of record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004445
As per the findings of the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) convened on 26 February 1987, it was ruled that she was physically unfit for duty and was separated from the U.S. Army for permanent medical retirement with a disability rating of 20 percent (%). The regulation stated a DD Form 214 would be prepared for Active Army Soldiers on termination of active duty by reason of a physical disability separation. The evidence shows she was retired from active duty by reason of temporary...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023919
On 7 August 1981, he was retired under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24e(2), by reason of temporary physical disability and he was placed on the TDRL. Orders Number D44-3, issued by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA), dated 4 March 1983, removed the applicant from the TDRL effective 31 March 1983 with a 20% disability rating and entitlement to severance pay. His contentions have been...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00114
Since the injury he suffered from headaches and one isolated seizure in October 2004. The Board considered at length both the TDRL rating and the final rating recommendations at separation from the TDRL. The VASRD does allow for a 10% rating for the cranial defect and the Board, by simple majority, recommends addition of this condition as unfitting, coded 5296, with a 10% TDRL rating and a 10% final rating.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03058
According to a Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 25 June 2008, she was placed in a Not Present for Duty Status in accordance with Air Force Instruction 48-123, paragraph (A)(2) and Air Force Reserve Command Surgeon General Policy Memorandum 06-01, due to a non- duty related medical condition that required a Worldwide Duty Evaluation (WDE) and evaluation by an MEB or PEB. Further, it must be noted the USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the members condition at that...