Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006793
Original file (20070006793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  2 October 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070006793 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Michael L. Engle

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Ann M. Campbell

Chairperson

Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas

Member

Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was assigned at Blue Lancer Valley in the Republic of Korea.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was assigned to Blue Lancer Valley but not to Company B, 702nd Maintenance Battalion.  He further states that Blue Lancer Valley was an area where individuals, like himself who were affected with the chemical Agent Orange, were assigned.  He contends that his duty station was altered to prevent him from receiving the compensation that he deserves.   

3.  The applicant provides copies of Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) and a letter of support

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 17 November 1966, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years.  Five days later, on 22 November 1966, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 26B3O (Weapons Support Radar Repairman). 

3.  On 16 May 1968, the applicant departed the Continental United States (CONUS) for duty in the Republic of Korea. 

4.  On 21 July 1968, the applicant was assigned to Headquarters and Company A, 702nd Maintenance Battalion, 2nd Infantry Division, Republic of Korea for duty as a weapons support radar repairman.  

5.  On 5 March 1969, the applicant was reassigned to Company B, 702nd Maintenance Battalion for duty as a radar repairman.  He remained in this position until his return to CONUS on 16 August 1969.

6.  On 17 August 1969, the applicant was released early from active duty as an overseas returnee.  He had attained the rank of private first class, pay grade E3, and had completed 2 years, 8 months, and 28 days of creditable active duty.

7.  Item 12 (Last duty Assignment and Major Command) of the applicant’s Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) shows Company B, 702nd Maintenance Battalion, Eighth United States Army.

8.  The letter of support provided by another Soldier who reports that he was assigned with the applicant in the Republic of Korea indicates that they were stationed at Blue Lancer Valley during the period from November or December 1968 to August 1969.  This Soldier does not remember the name of their company but does remember that they were a part of the 2nd Infantry Division.  

9.  Information from the Internet provided that the Blue Lancer Valley was a military compound located near Nullo-Ri, in the Republic of Korea.  It was flanked by mountains Easy Queen, Queen, and Radio Hill.  It was there to support a radar sight.  The 122nd Signal Corps and the 702nd Maintenance Battalion had mission responsibilities at the sight. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record clearly and convincingly shows that the applicant was assigned to the 702nd Maintenance Battalion and the data from the Internet is sufficiently convincing to show that this unit had mission responsibilities at Blue Lancer Valley.   

2.  There is no available evidence showing that the applicant or anyone else was assigned to the Blue Lancer Valley because they had been exposed to the chemical Agent Orange.  

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant’s request should not be granted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

 __LMD__  __JCR  __  __AMC_  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




_   _Ann M. Campbell_____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR2007006793      
SUFFIX

RECON
         
DATE BOARDED
20071002
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
 
DATE OF DISCHARGE
 
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
 . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
120
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022242

    Original file (20130022242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal. The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in the RVN after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. The available evidence of record shows the applicant's only overseas service was in the FRG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018406

    Original file (20070018406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record does show that he was assigned in Belgium and the Republic of Korea for a total overseas service of 3 years, 10 months, and 4 days. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by showing that, in addition to the awards shown on his DD Form 214, his authorized awards include the Korean Defense Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009652

    Original file (20100009652.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) as follows: * show award of the Army Commendation Medal and the Meritorious Unit Commendation * show he has 10-percent Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability compensation * show completion of military occupational specialty (MOS) 17K (Radar Operations Ground Control Radar) training 2. His DD Form 214 shows the following entries: * item 23a (Specialty Number and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01938

    Original file (BC-2005-01938.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 October 2005, for review and response. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017779

    Original file (20140017779.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Additionally, he participated in five campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to a silver service star to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 ending on 20 July 1974 to show this service star. However, in the absence of orders or documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021025

    Original file (20130021025.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, his duty assignment in Korea be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 29 September 1969. c. a DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge) was provided for his discharge on 31 March 1975. d. he received a DD Form 214 for the period 13 September 1966 to 29 September 1969. His records contain a DD Form 214 for this period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005994

    Original file (20090005994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be changed to a medical discharge. Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 7, physical profiling, provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002993

    Original file (20120002993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Purple Heart * Bronze Star Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge 2. He was sent to basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded primary MOS 41F (Projector Repairman) and secondary MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart, Bronze Star...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000480

    Original file (20140000480.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides: * self-authored statement * a copy of the original ABCMR proceedings with his notification letter * Army Regulation 600-8-22 document extract * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) * Communications-Electronics 1962 – 1970 E-Book internet document extract * Wikipedia internet document titled "United States Air Force in Thailand" * TLC Brotherhood internet document *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062500C070421

    Original file (2001062500C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 26 September 1968, he was assigned in a 67A, Aircraft Maintenance Repairman, duty position in Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 160 th Aviation Group, in Vietnam. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: