Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022242
Original file (20130022242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  31 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130022242 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal.

2.  The applicant states these medals are not shown on his DD Form 214.  He also states, in effect, that he has been diagnosed with having Type II Diabetes and needs to file a claim due to Agent Orange exposure.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 25 April 1967, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  He completed his initial training as a chemical equipment repairman.

3.  On 12 June 1968, the applicant departed Fort George G. Meade, MD, for duty in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG).

	a.  On 11 August 1968, he was assigned for duty as a chemical equipment repairman with the 881st Light Equipment Maintenance Company.

	b.  On 26 March 1969, he was reassigned within his company for duty as a senior chemical equipment repairman.

	c.  On 29 June 1969, he departed the FRG and returned to the United States.

4.  On 30 June 1969, the applicant was released from active duty.  He had attained the rank of specialist four, pay grade E-4 and had completed 1 year, 
11 months and 12 days of creditable active duty.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 lists his awards as:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards):

	a.  The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in the RVN after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.

	b.  The RVN Campaign Medal with 1960 Device was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in the RVN during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in the RVN for 6 months or more.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the RVN required the individual to provide direct combat support to the RVN and Armed Forces.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the RVN Campaign Medal.
2.  The available evidence of record shows the applicant's only overseas service was in the FRG.  There is no indication that he served in the RVN at any time during his period of active duty.

3.  Authorization to received either the Vietnam Service Medal or the RVN Campaign Medal requires actual duty in the RVN.  Records do not show the applicant performed any service in the RVN.  Furthermore, there is no supporting evidence showing that he provided any direct combat support to the RVN.  Therefore, his service does not qualify him for either of these medals.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130022242





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130022242



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022238

    Original file (20120022238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards): a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing on his DD Form 214 his foreign service as 1 year, 6 months and 18 days; b. adding in the Remarks block of his DD Form 214: "Service in the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027400

    Original file (20100027400.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). There is no evidence in his military records that shows the applicant served in the RVN or provided direct support to the RVN 6. This medal was awarded by the Government of the RVN to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in the RVN during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021078

    Original file (20110021078.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he was assigned to the 25th Chemical Company, Korea, from 21 March 1967 to 1 October 1967 and the 25th Chemical Company with duty with Task Force Pike, Vietnam, from 2 October 1967 to 20 April 1968. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002993

    Original file (20120002993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Purple Heart * Bronze Star Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge 2. He was sent to basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded primary MOS 41F (Projector Repairman) and secondary MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart, Bronze Star...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012034

    Original file (20090012034.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 10 November 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090012034 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award), for his qualifying period of honorable active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007899

    Original file (20110007899.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in the RVN. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 21 April 1966 to 20 April 1969, b. adding the following awards to item 24 of his DD Form 214: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * four bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002047

    Original file (20140002047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of: * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * All other awards he is authorized 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024073

    Original file (20100024073.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. he served in Vietnam; b. that after contacting the National Personnel Record Center (NPRC), he found he was unknowingly issued an ARCOM and AGCM based on his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II); c. that based on his latest DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), his records were not properly annotated to show the campaigns stars he is authorized for his service in Vietnam from 22 April 1969 through 11 November 1970; d. he may have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012736

    Original file (20060012736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012736 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084917C070212

    Original file (2003084917C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that he was never awarded the PH for the wounds he received while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). His Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) also contains no orders or other documents showing that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was recommended...