RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 31 May 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060017197
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz
Acting Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Mr. William Crain
Chairperson
Mr. Donald Lewy
Member
Mr. Roland Venable
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that a Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 3 November 1968, be removed from his military records.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that there was no physical examination on
3 November 1968. He states that they did not take his blood pressure or look into his ears, eyes, or check reflexes. He points out that item 39 (Identifying Body Marks, Scars, Tattoos) on this form states that he has a tattoo on his left forearm; however, he does not have a tattoo on his left or right forearm.
3. The applicant contends that he arrived at Fort Lewis, Washington with 100 plus returnees for expiration term of service (ETS) processing on 1 November 1968. He states they were sent to the dispensary the next day, instructed to fill out a form, and that they were asked for a urine specimen. They were told if they had any medical concerns to talk to the specialist four or specialist five in charge. He states that he asked the specialist four for medical treatment for the ringing in his ears and for a frequent dull pain in his side. The specialist four told him that if he wanted medical treatment that he would be extended past his ETS for probably 2 to 3 weeks and that he doubted that they could do anything for the applicant. The applicant states that he then went to the orderly room, signed out, and took a cab to the airport and flew home. He further states that he never went near the dispensary on 3 November 1968.
4. The applicant provides a copy of a Standard Form 88, dated 3 November 1968 and a letter, dated 30 November 2006, from a Member of Congress.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which occurred on 3 November 1968. The application submitted in this case is dated
24 November 2006.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file.
3. The applicant enlisted on 21 October 1965, served a combat construction specialist in Germany and Vietnam, and was released from active duty on
3 November 1968.
4. The applicant provided a copy of a Standard Form 88, dated 3 November 1968.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants contention that there was no physical examination on
3 November 1968 was noted. However, in the absence of definitive evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that a physical separation examination was performed on 3 November 1968. His contention that he does not have a tattoo on his left forearm is not evidence to the contrary since a tattoo can be removed. Regrettably, the passage of almost 40 years makes it difficult to determine what actually occurred during the applicants separation physical. As a result, there is an insufficient basis for granting the applicant's request.
2. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged injustice now under consideration on 3 November 1968; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error expired on 2 November 1971. The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
WC____ __DL____ __RV____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
William Crain_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR20060017197
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
20070531
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
134.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003232
The applicant provides: * VA Rating Decision, dated 18 October 2007 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Infantryman Badge 13. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004402C070206
The applicant's military service record shows that he enlisted in the U.S. Army on 27 January 1965. However, the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) was reviewed and found to contain documentation relating to the applicant's U.S. Army enlistment and separation medical examinations, which are, in pertinent part, discussed below. The evidence of record shows that there is only one (dated) entry on each SF 600 by the doctor in question (i.e., on 24 March 1965 and 17 June 1965).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012486
Correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge; and b. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the applicant was wounded and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart or Combat Infantryman Badge. This regulation also provides that there is no statute of limitations on request for award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027332
Item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "None." The available evidence shows: a. The new evidence the applicant provided indicates he showed a VA physician a military medical record which indicated he had no scars and tattoos, and a xeroxed medical record which indicated he had an old scratch on the "volar surface" of the left arm with secondary infection.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017857
The applicant states: * he was combat wounded in Vietnam * during a firefight in the jungles of Vietnam he sustained shrapnel wounds in the left forearm and left side of his head 3. The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013893
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant contends that he was wounded in the Republic of Vietnam and should have been awarded the Purple Heart. The SF 600 provided by the applicant shows that he had an injury to his right forearm and that it was medically treated.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088456C070403
The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 16 June 1965. The records failed to show the applicant was authorized award of the PH; there was no documentation in unit records to show his wounding, nor were there unit orders to show that he was awarded the PH. It would now be appropriate to administratively correct his record to show these awards.
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008798
He requests his records be corrected to show he was promoted to SGT/E-5, and that he be granted a medical retirement based on his wounds. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders, or other documents that indicate the applicant was promoted to SGT/E-5 by proper authority while he was serving on active duty. Although the applicant’s active duty service was commendable, and the sacrifices he made for his country were significant, absent any evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005341
The applicant provides copies of the following: * Army Commendation Medal certificate * Special Orders (SO) Number 134 * Record Courier Designation * Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) (two copies) * SF 600 (Health Record Chronological Record of Medical Care) * DA Form 3349 (Medical Condition Physical Profile Record) (two copies) * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * three alleged photographs of himself CONSIDERATION OF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003793C071029
On 22 October 2006, the applicant prepared a three-page letter, Subject: Request for Correction of Military Records, and addressed this letter to the Army Review Boards Agency. A*****, Jr., who states he was an eyewitness and knew and crewed the same helicopters and was on the same flights for many of their unit’s combat missions. The evidence he submitted, the Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 24 March 1970, does not indicate the wound he was treated for on that date was...