Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member | |
Ms. Eloise C. Prendergast | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart (PH).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that in February or March 1966 while on long-range reconnaissance patrol, he was wounded in both forearms and his right leg as a result of enemy mortar shrapnel. Initially, field medics treated him, however, upon return to camp at An Khe, Vietnam, his wounds were treated and he received fresh bandages. He submits in support of his request: a copy of his Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Compensation and Pension Examination, dated 8 October 1997, which determined the small white scars over both of his forearms are residuals of shrapnel fragment wounds (SFW); a DVA Rating Decision, dated 10 September 2002, which shows his combined disability rating equals 70% as of 6 May 2002, due posttraumatic stress disorder, bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus, and that he has a zero percent disability rating for shrapnel wound scars to both forearms.
4. The applicant also provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards); two photographs that show a male Caucasian soldier in a sitting position with his right hand bandaged; an envelope that is postmarked 10 March 1966; and a copy of a letter that he contends he wrote to his family from Vietnam. He states in the letter that an infection in his hand and leg are finally getting better.
5. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 16 June 1965. Upon completion of all required military training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). He was assigned to Vietnam and he served with Troop D, 1st Squadron, 9th Calvary, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) from 22 November 1965-21 November 1966 when he left Vietnam and returned to the United States. On 1 January 1967, he was assigned to Fort Hood, Texas.
6. Special Orders Number 185, dated 29 September 1965, awarded the applicant the Expert Marksmanship Badge (Pistol .45 Caliber) and Special Orders Number 195, dated 14 October 1965, awarded the applicant the Expert Marksmanship Badge (Machine Gun, M60). Both orders are from the United States Army Training Center, Fort Knox, Kentucky.
7. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Item 40 (Wounds) does not contain a comment. The applicant received a physical evaluation when he was separated and his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 14 June 1967, shows that he was determined to be qualified for separation and fails to note any wounds or injuries incurred due to hostile action. Item 39, (Modifying Body Marks, Scars, Tattoos) is annotated "Normal."
8. On 15 June 1967, the applicant was honorably released from active duty. His DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with two bronze service stars (BSS's), Vietnam Campaign Medal, Air Medal, Driver and Mechanic Badge with Driver Bar (W), Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Expert Marksmanship Badge (Rifle). It does not show award of the PH.
9. On 2 October 1984, the Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center (RCPAC), St. Louis, Missouri, determined that in addition to the above awards, the applicant is authorized award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL), an additional BSS for wear on the VSM, Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge and the Expert Marksmanship Badge (Pistol and Machine Gun). However, his record does not contain a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show these awards.
10. The staff of the Board thoroughly reviewed the historical files of Troop, D, 1st Battalion, 9th Calvary, 1st Cavalry Division that are located at the National Archives, College Park, Maryland. The records failed to show the applicant was authorized award of the PH; there was no documentation in unit records to show his wounding, nor were there unit orders to show that he was awarded the PH.
11. The Vietnam Casualty List, was also consulted and also failed to show the applicant's name.
12. Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-22 (Military Awards) sets forth Department of the Army criteria, policy and instructions concerning individual military awards, the GCMDL, service medals and service ribbons, combat and special skill badges and tabs, unit decorations, and trophies and similar devices awarded in recognition of accomplishments. It provides, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that: (1) the wound was the result of hostile action; (2) the wound required medical treatment; and (3) the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. To be awarded the Purple Heart, the applicant would have to show that he was wounded and that: (1) the wound was the result of hostile action; (2) the wound required medical treatment; and (3) the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
2. The staff of the Board made every attempt to verify the applicant's entitlement to the PH, but was unsuccessful. The applicant's records (Enlisted Qualification Record, separation physical examination) do not show that he was wounded. Neither do unit records nor the Vietnam Casualty List. The DVA records created years after the fact, and photographs that show a bandaged hand, do not establish sufficient justification to award the PH.
3. There is no basis for granting the applicant's request; however, the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect those awards identified by RCPAC on 2 October 1984 as belonging to the applicant. They are the GCMDL, a third BSS for wear on his VSM, the Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Expert Marksmanship Badge (Pistol .45 Caliber, and Machine Gun M60). It would now be appropriate to administratively correct his record to show these awards.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected, but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing the individual concerned a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show in Item 25 that he was awarded, the GCMDL, three BSS's for wear on his VSM, the Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Expert Marksmanship Badge (Pistol .45 Caliber, and Machine Gun M60).
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__aao___ __reb___ __ecp___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Arthur A. Omartian
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
CASE ID | AR2003088456 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | |
DATE BOARDED | 20031113 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
2. | 107.0056 |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088530C070403
Counsel requests the applicant's DD Form 214 be changed to reflect the award of the PH, the CIB, the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and any other awards for which the applicant is qualified. On 13 September 1970, General Orders Number 204 awarded the applicant the PH for wounds received on 12 September 1970. This document show the unit to which the applicant was assigned was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030039
The applicant states: a. his awards were not correctly documented on his DD Form 214 at the time of his discharge; and b. a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) should be issued to show the following awards: * Purple Heart (PH) * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960 (RVNCM) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Mortar Bar *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064087C070421
The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the PH. His DD Form 214 also does not show award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and there is no evidence that he was ever denied the award. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the individual concerned a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show award of the PH, the GCMDL, the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal, First...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009853
He also requests copies of the narrative for each award and issuance of a replacement set of all medals and awards. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the: * National Defense Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar 9. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067769C070402
Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-22 (Military Awards) sets forth Department of the Army criteria, policy and instructions concerning individual military awards, the Good Conduct Medal, service medals and service ribbons, combat and special skill badges and tabs, unit decorations, and trophies and similar devices awarded in recognition of accomplishments. The applicant was wounded in Vietnam on 23 November 1967. During his first period of service in the AUS, the applicant qualified for award of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077656C070215
The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show this award as an authorized award because it was awarded to his unit after he had been separated. To be awarded the Purple Heart, the applicant would have to show that he was wounded and that: (1) the wound was the result of hostile action; (2) the wound required medical treatment; and (3) the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060949C070421
The applicant states that he was awarded the PH due to a wound that he received while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in May 1967. The applicant is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the PH for the wounds he received on 10 May 1967. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the individual concerned a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show award of the PH, the MUC, the RVN Gallantry Cross with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063074C070421
The Government of Vietnam awarded this medal to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002058C070208
Powers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that the WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) of his deceased father, hereafter known as the former service member (FSM), be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart (PH). Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) indicates that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004453
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him...