Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012486
Original file (20080012486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        23 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080012486 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests:

	a.  Correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge; and

	b.  Reconsideration of his previous request to correct his rank from Private First Class (PFC/E-3) to Specialist Four (SP4/E-4).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his rank was SP4 when he was separated from the military.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with the period ending 11 September 1969 shows the incorrect rank of PFC.  He further states that he fought for his country and deserves the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge he should have been awarded 40 years ago. 

3.  The applicant provides a Department of Veterans Affairs Rating Decision, dated 22 April 2005.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR2004099972, on 13 July 2004.  Army Regulation 15-185 sets forth procedures for processing requests for correction of military records.  Paragraph 2-15b governs requests for reconsideration.  This provision of the regulation allows an applicant to request reconsideration of an earlier ABCMR decision if the request is received within one year of the ABCMR's original decision and it has not previously been reconsidered.  The applicant’s request for reconsideration of his rank is untimely and will not be further considered.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 12 September 1967 and successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 36K (Wireman).

4.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to B Battery, 3rd Battalion, 6th Artillery on or about 25 February 1968, where he performed duties as a wireman, switchboard operator, and artillery recorder.  He departed Vietnam on or about 18 February 1969.  

5.  Item 39 (Identifying body marks, scars, tattoos) of the applicant's Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 12 August 1969, shows no abnormalities other a tattoo on left forearm.  

6.  A Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History), dated 12 August 1969, shows that the applicant was being separated and that he stated, "In good health."  Item 33 (Have you ever had any illness or injury other than those already noted?) shows that he indicated "no."

7.  On 11 September 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing 2 years of creditable active service.

8.  The applicant's DD Form 214 with the period ending 11 September 1969 shows he was awarded National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Army Good Conduct Medal.
9.  There are no general orders in the applicant’s service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.  There also is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.  

10.  There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge.

11.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the applicant was wounded and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart or Combat Infantryman Badge.  

12.  The applicant's Army Medical Treatment Records are unavailable.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  This regulation also provides that there is no statute of limitations on request for award of the Purple Heart.

14.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  There are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and must actively participate in such ground combat.  Campaign or battle credit alone is not sufficient for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.  There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows his injury was a result of hostile action.  
2.  Regrettably, lacking any corroborating evidence of record showing the applicant was treated for a wound/injury that was the direct result of or caused by enemy action, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case.

3.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant was assigned to an Artillery Battery and his principal duties while in Vietnam were wireman, switchboard operator, and artillery recorder.  

4.  However, the three criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge are to be assigned to an infantry unit, perform infantry duties, and hold an infantry specialty.  It is acknowledged that the applicant may have functioned as an infantryman; however, the evidence of record shows that while serving in Vietnam his primary specialty was 36K Wireman which makes him ineligible for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012486





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012486



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013286

    Original file (20080013286.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 23a, (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 36K when he was released from active duty. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records, and the applicant provided none, to show that he was reclassified to an infantry MOS or to another MOS while he served on active duty or while he served in Vietnam. To be entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence must show that an applicant held and served in an infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016806

    Original file (20140016806.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in the following infantry MOSs of 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. To be entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence must show the applicant held and served in an infantry MOS while assigned/attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment, or smaller size and he must have served in active ground...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000128

    Original file (20100000128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and, in effect, a second award of the Combat Infantryman Badge for his service in Vietnam. The applicant states: * when he was in Vietnam with the 5th Special Forces Group he was hit in the right and left hand with shrapnel from a mortar round * he was never awarded the Purple Heart for this injury * he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge prior to going to Vietnam for combat action in the Dominican Republic and he feels he should have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021050

    Original file (20090021050.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart (1st Award) for wounds sustained during hostile action and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071688C070403

    Original file (2002071688C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Counsel contends that the record indicates the applicant served as a personnel carrier driver with the 5 th Mechanized Infantry while in Vietnam, this being in line with the duties of an infantryman. There are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015831

    Original file (20130015831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120019586 on 30 May 2013. His new argument has been noted; however, there is no available evidence of record showing that the applicant was assigned or attached to the Forward Observer Team...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063665C070421

    Original file (2001063665C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Although his DA Form 20 shows that he was assigned infantry duties (MOS 11B) with the "Phu Loi Patrol" from 15 December 1969 to 12 February 1970, there is nothing in the applicant's records to show that he was ever in combat or was ever awarded a CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054559C070420

    Original file (2001054559C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016640

    Original file (20060016640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 June 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060016640 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided no independent evidence, that shows he was ever awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge or was reclassified to or was awarded an infantry MOS. He is, therefore entitled...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009041

    Original file (20090009041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show award of two additional Purple Hearts, Combat Infantryman Badge, Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device; his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5; a second tour in Vietnam; and his date of separation as 11 February 1970. Without the applicant's service medical records, there is insufficient evidence to show that he was treated for any combat wounds except those incurred on 17...