Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016857
Original file (20060016857.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  12 June 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060016857 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Joyce A. Wright

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas

Chairperson

Mr. Edward E. Montgomery

Member

Ms. Rea M. Nuppenau

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 2 (Department, Component, and Branch), of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), and that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that she works for the VA (Department of Veterans Affairs).  In order to obtain retirement credit however, the documentation is confusing to the personnel department.  She was in the US Army Reserve (USAR) but her DD Form 214 listed her as "ARNG (Army National Guard)/USAR."

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 in support of her request. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 27 October 1987, the date of her discharge.  The application submitted in this case is dated 14 November 2006, but was received for processing on 7 December 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the USAR on 17 October 1980, in pay grade E-3, for 6 years, with an established expiration term of service (ETS) of 16 October 1986.  She was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) on 6 March 1981.  She successfully completed basic combat training at Fort McClellan, Alabama, and advanced individual training at Fort Sam Houston, Texas.  On completion of her advanced training, she was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS), 91B, Medical Specialist.  She was released from IADT and was return to a TPU (troop program unit), on 6 June 1981.




4.  The applicant was advanced to E-4 effective 13 June 1981.  

5.  The applicant’s DD Form 214, dated 4 July 1983, shows she was ordered to ADT on 16 August 1982 and was released from ADT on 4 July 1983. 

6.  Item 2 (Department, Component and Branch), of her DD Form 214, dated 4 July 1983, shows the entry "ARNG/USAR."

7.  On 20 September 1986, the applicant extended her enlistment for 1 year.  A new ETS of 16 October 1987 was established for her.

8.  The applicant was promoted to staff sergeant (SSG/E-6) effective 14 December 1986.

9.  On 3 October 1987, the applicant submitted a request for voluntary discharge, due to her ETS, of 16 October 1987.  Her request was approved on 20 October 1987.

10.  On 27 October 1987, the applicant was released from her TPU and was honorably discharged from the USAR, with an effective date of 27 October 1987, in the rank of SSG.

11.  The applicant's Summary of Retirement Points shows that she had completed 3 years of qualifying service for retirement purposes.  

12.  Army Regulation 135-178 establishes the policies, standards, and procedures governing the administrative separation of enlisted Soldiers from the Reserve Components.  Paragraph 1-3 states, in pertinent part, that orders discharging a Soldier would not be revoked or the effective date changed, after the effective date of discharge, unless there was evidence of manifest error or fraud.  After the effective date of discharge, orders can be amended by the separation authority only to correct manifest errors such as the wrong character of service or to correct administrative errors such as rank, social security number, or misspelled name.

13.  Army Regulation 140-10 sets forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail, and transfer of USAR Soldiers.  Chapter 7 of the regulation relates to the removal of Soldiers from an active status and states, in pertinent part, that Soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified
and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.


14.  Paragraph 6, of the same regulation, pertains to eligibility for transfer to the Retired Reserve.  It states that assignment to the Retired Reserve is authorized and Soldiers must request transfer if they:  

	(1)  Are entitled to receive retired pay from the U.S. armed forces because of prior military service; 

(2)  Have completed a total of 20 years of active or inactive service in the U.S. armed forces; 
(3)  Are medically disqualified for AD (active duty) resulting from a service-connected disability; 
(4)  Were appointed based on the condition the soldier immediately apply for transfer to the Retired Reserve; 
(5)  Reached the age of 37 and completed a minimum of 8 years of qualifying Federal service; 
(6)  Reached the age of 37, completed a minimum of 8 years of qualifying Federal service and served at least 6 months of AD in time of war or national emergency. (Service performed after 1 July 1949 is also creditable.) 
(7)  Completed 10 or more years of active Federal commissioned service; and
(8)  Are medically disqualified, not as a result of own misconduct, for retention in an active status or entry on AD, regardless of the total years of service completed. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence clearly shows that she enlisted in the USAR and continued to serve in the USAR until she was honorably discharged due to her ETS.  Her DD Form 214, dated 4 July 1983, listed her component as "ARNG/USAR".  Her records failed to show that she had ever served in the ARNG.  Therefore, item 2, of her DD Form 214, date 4 July 1983, is incorrect and should therefore show the correct entry of "USAR" instead of the entry "ARNG/USAR."

2.  The applicant completed 3 years of qualifying service for retirement purposes. There is no evidence to show that she met the criteria for eligibility for transfer to the Retired Reserve.  Therefore, there is an insufficient basis upon which to approve her request for transfer to the Retired Reserve. 

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 27 October 1987; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 26 October 1990.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations; however, based on the available evidence, it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___LD___  __r_____  ___EM __  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the entry "USAR," in item 2 (Department, Component and Branch), of her DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the applicant's request that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve.  




_____LaVerne M. Douglas______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060016857
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070612
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE
19871027
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR .135-178/140-10
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
136
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013174

    Original file (20130013174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This memorandum informed the FSM that he was 22 to 27 pounds over the weight standards prescribed in Army Regulation 600-9 (The Army Weight Control Program). (3) ARPC 600-E which shows he served in the: (a) Regular Army from 1 February 1967 to 30 April 1971 and was credited with 5 good years for retirement (50 or more retirement points per year). * 1 May 1971 to 30 April 1972: 15 points * 1 May 1972 to 2 October 1972: 6 points (c) ARNG from 9 December 1972 to 4 March 1978 and was credited...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065431C070421

    Original file (2001065431C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, for the period ending 24 June 1991 be corrected to show she had continuous service from 30 April 1981 to 1 July 1991, to add the Volunteer Service Ribbon, to show that she is entitled to wear the numeral 2 with the Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (NPDR), and to add the three unit supply specialist courses she attended. She provides her DD Form 214 for the period ending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062721C070421

    Original file (2001062721C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that she be granted entitlement to annuity benefits from the Reserve Component-Survivor Benefit Program (RC-SBP) based upon her deceased husband’s, the former service member (FSM), years of service in the Army National Guard (ARNG) and Army Reserve (USAR). A subsequent Chronological Record of Military Service (ARPC Form 249-3), dated 29 July 1994, indicates only one qualifying year between the retirement year ending (RYE) 30 June 1958 and the 12 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013819

    Original file (20090013819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he completed 34 weeks of active duty for training (ADT). On 11 June 1983, the U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, published Orders T-06-318967, ordering the applicant to ADT for a period of 61 days, effective 11 August 1983 (later amended to show 11 July 1983), completion of the Medical Services Officer Basic Course with attachment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022332

    Original file (20120022332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service. Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous active duty for training (ADT), Full-Time National Guard Duty, active duty for special work, temporary tours of active duty, or Active Guard Reserve service. Effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04102689C070208

    Original file (04102689C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The report indicated that after the tests her medical board proceedings should be complete. On 9 February 2000, in response to her 28 September 1999 application to this Board requesting active duty pay from 7 July 1983 to 15 December 1988; and her request to correct her records to show that she had 20 qualifying years for retirement, she was informed that the Board would be unable to grant her request for active duty pay. Although there is no evidence whether or not she concurred with that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018123

    Original file (20100018123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows: a. on 2 March 1982 she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and she was ordered to active duty for split option training; b. from 24 May 1982 to 17 July 1982 she attended basic training at Fort Jackson, SC; c. in Orders Number 40-7, issued by the Military Entrance Processing Station, Nashville, TN, dated 25 February 1983, she was ordered to active duty to attend advanced individual training in MOS 72E; d. in Orders Number 106-143, issued by Headquarters,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085863C070212

    Original file (2003085863C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009142

    Original file (20120009142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 June 1999 to add the following awards: * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (5th Award) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (5th Award) * Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA) (2nd Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (4th Award) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) (2nd Award) * Noncommissioned Officer (NCO)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006785C070205

    Original file (20060006785C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she was never in the U.S. Army Reserve and that her reserve obligation date in item 12i, of her DD Form 214, should be removed and that she was serving in pay grade E-3 prior to her release from active duty. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 6 August 1982, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, paragraph 5-31, EPD, in pay grade E-2, with transfer to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete her...